Abstract
Endosonography enables detection and localization of small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PETs) which cannot be detected by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Knowledge about the prognosis of very small PETs in MEN1 is limited, and if there are no clinical symptoms, endocrine activity or mechanical problems and thus no clear indication for surgical therapy, an appropriate decision for the management of such patients might be to control their follow-up by endosonographic imaging. Therefore, the reproducibility of the measurement of the diameter of very small PETs by endosonographic imaging was investigated in this prospective study. We included 33 PETs smaller than 15 mm in their largest diameter detected by endosonographic imaging (Pentax FG 32 UA) in ten patients with genetically confirmed MEN1-disease. Three repeated measurements of each tumor were performed. Reproducibility was expressed as mean coefficient of variation of intra-observer variability. Mean tumor diameter was 6.9 ± 3.4 mm (range 2.8 - 14.2 mm). Mean coefficient of variation was 5.5 ± 4.6 % (range 0.0 - 19.4 %): in tumors < 5 mm (n = 13) 7.1 ± 6.3 %, in tumors > 5 mm (n = 20) 4.4 ± 2.6 %. Least significant change (p < 0.05) was calculated as 15.4 % (tumors < 5 mm: 19.9 %; tumors > 5 mm: 12.3 %). In conclusion, endosonographic imaging enables the measurement of small PETs with an acceptable reproducibility. Changes of tumor diameter of more than 20 % have to be taken as statistically significant.
Key words
MEN1 - PET - EUS - RECIST - endosonography - endoscopical ultrasound - pancreas - tumor - neuroendocrine - endocrine - multiple endocrine neoplasia - reproducibility - coefficient of variation - least significant change
References
23
Bartsch D K, Langer P, Wild A, Schilling T, Celik I, Rothmund M, Nies C.
Pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: surgery or surveillance?.
Surgery.
2000;
128
958-966
28
Byrne M J, Nowak A K.
Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Ann Oncol.
2004;
15
257-260
18
Carty S E, Helm A K, Amico J A, Clarke M R, Foley T P, Watson C G, Mulvihill J J.
The variable penetrance and spectrum of manifestations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.
Surgery.
1998;
124
1106-1113
19
Chanson P, Cadiot G, Murat A.
Management of patients and subjects at risk for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: MEN 1.
Horm Res.
1997;
47
211-220
34
Cortes J, Rodriguez J, Diaz-Gonzalez J A, Garzon C, Gurpide A, Arbea L, Gil-Bazo I, Navarro V, Cambeiro M, Nicolas A I, Martin-Algarra S, Garcia-Foncillas J, Calvo E.
Comparison of unidimensional and bidimensional measurements in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Br J Cancer.
2002;
87
158-160
1
Dancygier H.
Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
1995;
5
1052-1057
2
Devière J, Finet L, Dunham F, Cremer M.
Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis.
Endoscopy.
1994;
26
808-809
21
Gauger P G, Scheiman J M, Wamsteker E J, Richards M L, Doherty G M, Thompson N W.
Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in screening and treatment of pancreatic endocrine tumours in asymptomatic patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.
Br J Surg.
2003;
90
748-754
3
Grimm H, Mayendo A, Soehendra N.
Endoluminal ultrasound for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol.
1990;
4
869-888
31
James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, Terenziani M, Vena D, Muldal A, Therasse P.
Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
1999;
91
523-528
16
Kann P, Bittinger F, Engelbach M, Bohner S, Weis A, Beyer J.
Endosonography of insulin-secreting and clinically non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: criteria for benignancy and malignancy.
Eur J Med Res.
2001;
6
385-390
17
Kann P H, Wirkus B, Keth A, Goitom K.
Pitfalls in endosonographic imaging of suspected insulinomas: pancreatic nodules of unknown dignity.
Eur J Endocrinol.
2003;
148
531-534
14
Kann P H, Wirkus B, Behr T, Klose K ‐J, Meyer S.
Endosonographic imaging of benign and malignant pheochromocytomas.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2004;
89
1694-1697
15
Kann P H.
Endosonographic imaging of the adrenals.
Endoscopy.
2005;
37
244-253
22
Langer P, Kann P H, Fendrich V, Richter G, Diehl S, Rothmund M, Bartsch D K.
Prospective evaluation of imaging procedures for the detection of pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumors (PETs) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).
World J Surg.
2004;
28
1317-1322
4
Lees W R.
Endoscopic ultrasonography of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocysts.
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl.
1986;
123
123-129
29
Mazumdar M, Smith A, Schwartz L H.
A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline.
J Clin Epidemiol.
2004;
57
358-365
25
McHugh K, Kao S.
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST): problems and need for modifications in paediatric oncology?.
Br J Radiol.
2003;
76
433-436
30
Miller A B, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A.
Reporting results of cancer treatment.
Cancer.
1981;
47
207-214
5
Müller M F, Meyerberger C, Bertschinger P, Schaer R, Marincek B.
Pancreatic tumors: Evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging.
Radiology.
1994;
190
745-751
6
Nattermann C, Dancygier H.
Endosonographie bei Tumoren des Pankreas und der Gallenwege.
Leber Magen Darm.
1993;
1
13-23
7
Nattermann C, Goldschmidt A JW, Dancygier H.
Endosonography in chronic pancreatitis - a comparison between endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography.
Endoscopy.
1993;
25
565-570
8
Nattermann C, Goldschmidt A JW, Dancygier H.
Endosonographie in der Dignitätsbeurteilung von Pankreastumoren.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr.
1995;
120
1571-1576
20
Owen N J, Sohaib S A, Peppercorn P D, Monson J P, Grossman A B, Besser G M, Reznek R H.
MRI of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.
Br J Radiol.
2001;
74
968-973
24
Padhani A R, Ollivier L.
The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists.
Br J Radiol.
2001;
74
983-986
26
Park J O, Lee S I, Song S Y, Kim K, Kim W S, Jung C W, Park Y S, Im Y H, Kang W K, Lee M H, Lee K S, Park K.
Measuring response in solid tumors: comparison of RECIST and WHO response criteria.
Jpn J Clin Oncol.
2003;
33
533-537
9
Rösch T, Lorenz R, Braig C, Feuerbach S, Siewert J R, Classen M.
Endosonographische Diagnostik bei Pankreastumoren.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr.
1990;
115
1339-1347
33
Therasse P, Arbuck S G, Eisenhauer E A, Wanders J, Kaplan R S, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom A T, Christian M C, Gwyther S G.
New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
2000;
92
205-216
35
Trillet-Lenoir V, Freyer G, Kaemmerlen P, Fond A, Pellet O, Lombard-Bohas C, Gaudin J L, Lledo G, Mackiewicz R, Gouttebel M C, Moindrot H, Boyer J D, Chassignol L, Stremsdoerfer N, Desseigne F, Moreau J M, Hedelius F, Moraillon A, Chapuis F, Bleuse J P, Barbier Y, Heilmann M O, Valette P J.
Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: accuracy of the RECIST criteria.
Br J Radiol.
2002;
75
903-908
32
van Klaveren R J, Aerts J G, de Bruin H, Giaccone G, Manegold C, van Meerbeeck J P.
Inadequacy of the RECIST criteria for response evaluation in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Lung Cancer.
2004;
43
63-69
27
Watanabe H, Yamamoto S, Kunitoh H, Sekine I, Yamamoto N, Ohe Y, Tamura T, Kodama T, Sugimura K, Saijo N.
Tumor response to chemotherapy: the validity and reproducibility of RECIST guidelines in NSCLC patients.
Cancer Sci.
2003;
94
1015-1020
10
Wiersema M J, Hawes H, Lehmann G A, Kochmann M L, Sherman S, Kopecky K K.
Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin.
Endoscopy.
1993;
25
555-564
11
Wiersema M J, Wiersema L M.
Endosonography of the pancreas: normal variation versus changes of early chronic pancreatitis.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
1995;
5
487-496
12
Yasuda K, Mukai H, Fujimoto S, Nakajiama M, Kawai K.
The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1988;
134
1-8
13
Zuccaro Jr G, Sivak Jr M V.
Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.
Endoscopy.
1992;
24
347-349
M.D., Professor of Endocrinology Peter Herbert Kann
Head Division of Endocrinology & Diabetology Philipp's University Hospital
35033 Marburg
Germany
Telefon: + 4964212863135
Fax: + 49 642 12 86 27 33
eMail: Kannp@med.uni-marburg.de