Improved Colonoscopy Success Rate with a Distally Attached Mucosectomy Cap

Background and Study Aims: Although colonoscopy is a well-established procedure, various technical difficulties may cause failure. This report describes experience with cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC), a technique in which a mucosectomy cap is attached to the end of colonoscope in order to improve the success rate.
Patients and Methods: From January 2003 to May 2005, CAC was used in consecutive patients with difficult colonoscopy procedures, which were defined firstly as failure to pass through the sigmoid colon after 20 min of examination, or secondly as failure to reach the cecum at the end of the procedure. Patients with prior colonic surgery, poor bowel preparation, distal colonic stricture, or obstructing tumors were excluded. The results with the CAC method were reviewed retrospectively.
Results: A total of 100 patients met the criteria for difficult colonoscopy during the study period. When CAC was used to repeat the procedure, cecal and terminal ileal intubation could then be achieved in 94 and 70 patients, respectively. In the remaining six patients in whom cecal intubation failed, one failure was due to a tumor obstruction at the splenic flexure.
Conclusions: CAC can be used as a rescue method to improve the success rate of colonoscopy when failure is encountered.

References

• 1 Church J M. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 556-560
• 2 Cirocco W C, Rusin L C. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 964-968
• 3 Saunders B P, Fukumoto M, Halligan S. et al . Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 124-126
• 4 Anderson J C, Messina C R, Cohn W. et al . Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 558-562
• 5 Wexner S D, Garbus J E, Singh J J. SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group . A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies: reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 251-261
• 6 Shumaker D A, Zaman A, Katon R M. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 172-179
• 7 Kozarek R A, Botoman V A, Patterson D J. Prospective evaluation of a small caliber upper endoscope for colonoscopy after unsuccessful standard examination.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 333-335
• 8 Lichtenstein G R, Park P D, Long W B. et al . Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 187-190
• 9 Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King P D. et al . Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 314-317
• 10 Shah S G, Brooker J C, Williams C B. et al . Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2000;  356 1718-1722
• 11 Raju G S, Rex D K, Kozarek R A. et al . A novel shape-locking guide for prevention of sigmoid looping during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 416-419
• 12 Marshall J B. Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 287-291
• 13 Shumaker D A, Zaman A, Katon R M. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 711-714
• 14 Rex D K, Goodwine B W. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1148-1151
• 15 Kaffes A J, Mishra A, Ding S L. et al . A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 685-689
• 16 Tada M, Inoue H, Yabata E. et al . Feasibility of the transparent cap-fitted colonoscope for screening and mucosal resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 618-621
• 17 Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K. et al . Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 444-447
• 18 Dafnis G M. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 381-384