Background and Study Aims: Although colonoscopy is a well-established procedure, various technical difficulties may cause failure. This report describes experience with cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC), a technique in which a mucosectomy cap is attached to the end of colonoscope in order to improve the success rate. Patients and Methods: From January 2003 to May 2005, CAC was used in consecutive patients with difficult colonoscopy procedures, which were defined firstly as failure to pass through the sigmoid colon after 20 min of examination, or secondly as failure to reach the cecum at the end of the procedure. Patients with prior colonic surgery, poor bowel preparation, distal colonic stricture, or obstructing tumors were excluded. The results with the CAC method were reviewed retrospectively. Results: A total of 100 patients met the criteria for difficult colonoscopy during the study period. When CAC was used to repeat the procedure, cecal and terminal ileal intubation could then be achieved in 94 and 70 patients, respectively. In the remaining six patients in whom cecal intubation failed, one failure was due to a tumor obstruction at the splenic flexure. Conclusions: CAC can be used as a rescue method to improve the success rate of colonoscopy when failure is encountered.
References
1
Church J M.
Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1994;
89
556-560
5
Wexner S D, Garbus J E, Singh J J. SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group .
A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies: reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.
Surg Endosc.
2001;
15
251-261
6
Shumaker D A, Zaman A, Katon R M.
A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
172-179
7
Kozarek R A, Botoman V A, Patterson D J.
Prospective evaluation of a small caliber upper endoscope for colonoscopy after unsuccessful standard examination.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1989;
35
333-335
8
Lichtenstein G R, Park P D, Long W B. et al .
Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
187-190
10
Shah S G, Brooker J C, Williams C B. et al .
Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet.
2000;
356
1718-1722
11
Raju G S, Rex D K, Kozarek R A. et al .
A novel shape-locking guide for prevention of sigmoid looping during colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
59
416-419
13
Shumaker D A, Zaman A, Katon R M.
Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Endoscopy.
2002;
34
711-714
14
Rex D K, Goodwine B W.
Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2002;
97
1148-1151
15
Kaffes A J, Mishra A, Ding S L. et al .
A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
685-689
16
Tada M, Inoue H, Yabata E. et al .
Feasibility of the transparent cap-fitted colonoscope for screening and mucosal resection.
Dis Colon Rectum.
1997;
40
618-621
17
Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K. et al .
Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
444-447
18
Dafnis G M.
Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.
Endoscopy.
2000;
32
381-384
