Endoscopic Ultrasound Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocyst: A Prospective Comparison with Conventional Endoscopic Drainage

Background and Study Aims: Pancreatic pseudocysts are a complication in up to 20 % of patients with pancreatitis. Endoscopic management of pseudocysts by a conventional transenteric technique, i. e. conventional transmural drainage (CTD), or by endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage (EUD), is well described. Our aim was to prospectively compare the short-term and long-term results of CTD and EUD in the management of pseudocysts.
Patients and Methods: A total of 99 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts according to this predetermined treatment algorithm: patients with bulging lesions without obvious portal hypertension underwent CTD; all remaining patients underwent EUD. Patients were followed prospectively, with cross-sectional imaging during clinic visits. We compared short-term and long-term results (effectiveness and complications) at 1 and 6 months post procedure.

Results: 46 patients (37 men) underwent EUD and 53 patients (39 men) had CTD. The mean age of the entire group was 50 ± 13 years. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding short-term success (93 % vs. 94 %) or long-term success (84 % vs. 91 %); 68 of the 99 patients completed 6 months of follow-up. Complications occurred in 19 % of EUD vs. 18 % of CTD patients, and consisted of bleeding in three, infection of the collection in eight, stent migration into the pseudocyst in three, and pneumoperitoneum in five. All complications but one could be managed conservatively.
Conclusions: No clear differences in efficacy or safety were observed between conventional and EUS-guided cystenterostomy. The choice of technique is likely best predicated by individual patient presentation and local expertise.

References

• 1 Barthet M, Bugallo M, Moreira L S. et al . Treatment of pseudocysts in acute pancreatitis. Retrospective study of 45 patients.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1992;  16 853-859
• 2 Grace P A, Williamson R C. Modern management of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Br J Surg. 1993;  80 573-581
• 3 Usatoff V, Brancatisano R, Williamson R C. Operative treatment of pseudocysts in patients with chronic pancreatitis.  Br J Surg. 2000;  87 1494-1499
• 4 Rosso E, Alexakis N, Ghaneh P. et al . Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment.  Dig Surg. 2003;  20 397-406
• 5 Gumaste V V, Pitchumoni C S. Pancreatic pseudocyst.  Gastroenterologist. 1996;  4 33-43
• 6 Heider R, Meyer A A, Galanko J A, Behrns K E. Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients.  Ann Surg. 1999;  229 781-787; discussion 787-789
• 7 Baron T H, Harewood G C, Morgan D E, Yates M R. Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 7-17
• 8 Barthet M, Sahel J, Bodiou-Bertei C, Bernard J P. Endoscopic transpapillary drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 208-213
• 9 Binmoeller K F, Seifert H, Walter A, Soehendra N. Transpapillary and transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 219-224
• 10 Catalano M F, Geenen J E, Schmalz M J. et al . Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts with ductal communication by transpapillary pancreatic duct endoprosthesis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 214-218
• 11 Cremer M, Deviere J, Engelholm L. Endoscopic management of cysts and pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis: long-term follow-up after 7 years of experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 1-9
• 12 Grimm H, Binmoeller K F, Soehendra N. Endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 170-171
• 13 Wiersema M J. Endosonography-guided cystoduodenostomy with a therapeutic ultrasound endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 614-617
• 14 Bradley E L 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992.  Arch Surg. 1993;  128 586-590
• 15 Cortes E S, Maalak A, Le Moine O. et al . Endoscopic cystenterostomy of nonbulging pancreatic fluid collections.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 380-386
• 16 Yeo C, Sarr M. Cystic and pseudocystic diseases of the pancreas.  Curr Probl Surg. 1994;  31 165-243
• 17 Beckingham I J, Krige J E, Bomman P C, Terblanche J. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 1638-1645
• 18 Howell D A, Holbrook R F, Bosco J J. et al . Endoscopic needle localization of pancreatic pseudocysts before transmural drainage.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 693-698
• 19 Grimm H, Meyer W H, Nam V C, Soehendra N. New modalities for treating chronic pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 1989;  21 70-74
• 20 Kozarek R A, Ball T J, Patterson D J. et al . Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  100 1362-1370
• 21 De Palma G D, Galloro G, Puzziello A. et al . Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a long-term follow-up study of 49 patients.  Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2002;  49 1113-1115
• 22 Kahaleh M, Rockoff T, Bickston S. et al . Factors predictive of resolution in pancreatic pseudocysts treated endoscopically.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB203
• 23 Smits M E, Rauws E A, Tytgat G N, Huibregtse K. The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 202-207
• 24 Fockens P. EUS in drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 S93-97
• 25 Giovannini M, Binmoeller K, Seibert H. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cystogastrostomy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 239-245
• 26 Monkemuller K E, Baron T H, Morgan D E. Transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections without electrocautery using the Seldinger technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 195-200
• 27 Morgan D E, Baron T H, Smith J K. et al . Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US.  Radiology. 1997;  203 773-778
• 28 Zhang X M, Mitchell D G, Dohke M. et al . Pancreatic cysts: depiction on single-shot fast spin-echo MR images.  Radiology. 2002;  223 547-553
• 29 Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, De Maertelaere V. et al . Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 715-723
• 30 Grimm H, Binmoeller K F, Soehendra N. Endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 170-171
• 31 Gerolami R, Giovannini M, Laugier R. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts guided by endosonography.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 106-108
• 32 Pfaffenbach B, Langer M, Stabenow-Lohbauer U, Lux G. Endosonographisch geführte transgastrale drainage von Pankreaspseudozysten.  Dtsch Med Wschr. 1998;  123 1439-1442
• 33 Giovannini M, Bernardini D, Seitz J. Cystogastrostomy entirely performed under endosonography guidance for pancreatic pseudocyst: results in six patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 200-203
• 34 Villmann P, Hancke S, Pless T. et al . One-step endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst: a new technique of stent delivery through the echo endoscope.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 730-733
• 35 Seibert H, Dietrich C, Schmitt T. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided one-step transmural drainage of cystic abdominal lesions with a large-channel echo enodscope.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 255-259
• 36 Giovannini M, Pesenti C, Rolland A L. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echo endoscope.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 473-477