Zusammenfassung
Die USKM-gestützte Sonographie ist eine viel versprechende, einfach durchzuführende Methode, die den bislang üblichen Verfahren wie der konventionellen B-Mode-Sonographie (Volumenmessung, Hämatomnachweis) und Farbdoppler-Untersuchung (Rejektionsdiagnostik, Perfusionsdefekt, Vaskularisation) bei der Transplantatnierenbeurteilung gegenübergestellt werden kann. Die Methode hat zusätzliches Potenzial bei der Dignitätseinschätzung von tumorösen Strukturen im Transplantat. In einem Untersuchungsgang können mittels USKM-Sonographie unterschiedlichste Fragestellungen der frühen postoperativen Phase und der Langzeitnachsorge betrachtet werden. Charakteristische Anflutkurven bei vaskulärer Rejektion führen in ersten klinischen Studien zur effizienten und zeitnahen Beurteilung der Transplantatniere. Auch chirurgische Komplikationen wie der Perfusionsdefekt oder das postoperative Hämatom können detektiert werden. Die Perfusionswirksamkeit eines Hämatoms kann abgeschätzt werden.
Abstract
Contrast ultrasound is a promising and straightforward method that is superior to established sonographic techniques such as conventional B-mode scanning which is used for volume measurement and hematoma demonstration. Color Doppler is important for the evaluation of rejection, the detection of perfusion defects, and complete vascularization in the diagnostic evaluation of kidney grafts. Moreover, contrast US has the potential for tumor characterization in transplanted kidneys. A single examination by contrast ultrasound can answer a variety of questions with respect to the early postoperative phase and chronic damage. New applications of contrast US will arise from the further technical development of ultrasound equipment. The rapid technical advances seen in recent years have been followed by the introduction of new software tools for the analysis of raw datasets or the improved visualization of microbubbles at very low energy. Initial studies show that efficient and early diagnosis of rejection is possible. Surgical complications like perfusion defects or hematoma can also be identified.
Key words
Color duplex ultrasound - kidney transplant - contrast agent
Literatur
1
Dickenmann M, Gurke L.
Kidney transplantation.
Ther Umsch.
2005;
62
443-447
2
Schnuelle P, Lorenz D, Trede M. et al .
Impact of renal cadaveric transplantation on survival in end-stage renal failure: evidence for reduced mortality risk compared with hemodialysis during long-term follow-up.
J Am Soc Nephrol.
1998;
9
2135-2141
3
Winkelmayer W C, Weinstein M C, Mittleman M A. et al .
Health economic evaluations: the special case of end-stage renal disease treatment.
Med Decis Making.
2002;
22
417-430
4
Niu S F, Li I C.
Quality of life of patients having renal replacement therapy.
J Adv Nurs.
2005;
51
15-21
5
Bittencourt Z Z, Alves Filho G, Mazzali M. et al .
Quality of life in renal transplant patients: impact of a functioning graft.
Rev Saude Publica.
2004;
38
732-734
6
Diethelm A G, Deierhoi M H, Hudson S L. et al .
Progress in renal transplantation. A single center study of 3359 patients over 25 years.
Ann Surg.
1995;
221
446-458
7
Lee H M, Posner M P, King A L. et al .
Status of long-term (25 years) survival of kidney transplant patients.
Transplant Proc.
1993;
25
1336-1337
8
Angaben der „Deutschen Stiftung Organspende”, http://www.dso.de.
9
Alvarez G, Gonzalez-Molina M, Cabello M. et al .
Pulsed and continuous Doppler evaluation of renal dysfunction after kidney transplantation.
Eur J Radiol.
1991;
12
108-112
10
Arima M, Ogino T, Hosokawa S. et al .
Functional image diagnosis of kidney transplants using ultrasonic Doppler flowmetry and magnetic resonance imaging.
Transplant Proc.
1989;
21
1907-1911
11
De-Gaetano A M, Boldrini G, Nanni G. et al .
Noninvasive surveillance of allografted kidneys by ultrasonic duplex scanning.
Angiology.
1989;
40
705-715
12
Flückner F, Steiner H, Horn S. et al .
Farbkodierte Duplexsonographie and Widerstandsindex bei Nierentransplantaten mit Dysfunktion.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
1990;
153
692-697
13
Grenier N, Douws C, Morel D. et al .
Detection of vascular complications in renal allografts with color Doppler flow imaging.
Radiology.
1991;
178
217-223
14
Hollenbeck M.
New diagnostic techniques in clinical nephrology. Colour coded duplex sonography of renal transplants - tool or toy for the nephrologist?.
Nephrol Dial Transplant.
1994;
9
1822-1828
15
Steinberg H V, Nelson R C, Murphy F B. et al .
Renal allograft rejection: evaluation by Doppler US and MR Imaging.
Radiology.
1987;
162
337-342
16
Radermacher J, Mengel M, Ellis S. et al .
The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival.
N Engl J Med.
2003;
349
182-184
17
Restrepo-Schafer I K, Schwerk W B, Muller T F. et al .
Intrarenal doppler flow analysis in patients with kidney transplantation and stable transplant function.
Ultraschall Med.
1999;
20
87-92
18
Letourneau J G, Day D L, Feinberg S B.
Ultrasound and computed tomographic evaluation of renal transplantation.
Radiol Clin North Am.
1987;
25
267-279
19
Townsend R R, Tomlanowich S J, Goldstein R B. et al .
Combined Doppler and morphologic sonographic evaluation of renal transplant rejection.
J Ultrasound Med.
1990;
9
199-206
20
Weskott H P.
Power US: Phantom measurement of slow flow.
Radiology.
1995;
197
337
21
Waiser J, Schreiber M, Budde K. et al .
Prognostic value of the Banff classification.
Transpl Int.
2000;
13
106-111
22
Bude R O, Rubin J M, Adler E D.
Power versus conventionel color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of normal intrarenal vasculature.
Radiology.
1994;
192
777-780
23
Genkins S M, Sanfilippo F P, Caroll B A.
Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: Lack of sensitivity and specificity in establishing pathologic diagnosis.
Am J Roentgenol.
1989;
152
535-539
24
Hollenbeck M, Hilbert N, Meusel F. et al .
Increasing sensitivity and specificity of Doppler sonographic detection of renal transplant rejection with serialinvestigation technique.
Clin Investig.
1994;
72
609-615
25
Phillips A O, Deane C, O’Donnell P. et al .
Evaluation of Doppler ultrasound in primary non-function of renal transplants.
Clin Transplant.
1994;
8
83-86
26
Rigsby C M, Burns P M, Weltin G G. et al .
Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation.
Radiology.
1987;
162
39-42
27
Mallek R, Mostbeck G, Kain R. et al .
Vaskuläre Nierentransplantatabstoßung - Ist eine duplexsonographische Diagnose möglich?.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
1990;
152
283
28
Hollenbeck M, Stuhrmann M, Trapp R. et al .
Farbkodierte Dopplersonographie zur Früherkennung von Abstoßungsreaktionen nach allogener Nierentransplantation.
Dtsch med Wochenschr.
1994;
116
921-927
29
Tanaka T, Kyo M, Kokado. et al .
Correlation between the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft biopsies and clinical outcome.
Transpl Int.
2004;
17
59-64
30
Pizzolitto S, Boscutti G, Falconieri G. et al .
Clinicopathologic correlations in acute renal graft rejection.
G Ital Nefrol.
2004;
21
19-27
31
Pozniak M A, Dodd G D, Kelcz F.
Ultrasonographic evaluation of renal transplantation.
Radiol Clin North Am.
1992;
30
1053-1066
32
Fahlenkamp D, Schönberger B, Lindeke A. et al .
Laparoskopische Lymphozelendrainage nach Nierentransplantation.
Z Urologie.
1993;
2
55-56
33
Benoit G, Bensadoun H, Jardin A.
Surgical complications of kidney transplantation.
European Urology Update Series.
1993;
2
178-183
34
Martinoli C, Bertolotto M, Crespi G. et al .
Duplex Doppler analysis of interlobular arteries in transplanted kidneys.
Eur Radiol.
1998;
8
765-769
35
Takano R, Ando Y, Taniguchi N. et al .
Power Doppler sonography of the kidney: effect of Valsalva’s maneuver.
J Clin Ultrasound.
2001;
29
384-390
36
Schwerk W B, Restrepo I K, Prinz H.
Semiquantitative analysis of intrarenal arterial Doppler flow spectra in healthy adults.
Ultraschall Med.
1993;
14
117-122
37
Delbeke D, Sacks G A, Sandler M P.
Diagnosis of allograft renal vein thrombosis.
Clin Nucl Med.
1989;
14
415-420
38
Duckett T, Bretan P N, Cochran S T.
Noninvasive radiological diagnosis of renal vein thrombosis in renal transplantation.
J Urol.
1991;
46
403-406
39
Laplante S, Patriquin H B, Robitaille P. et al .
Renal vein thrombosis in children: evidence of early flow recovery with Doppler US.
Radiology.
1993;
189
37-42
40
Deane C, Cowan N, Giles J. et al .
Arteriovenous fistulas in renal transplants: color Doppler ultrasound observations.
Urol Radiol.
1992;
13
211-217
41
Birkeland S A, Rohr N, Elbirk A. et al .
Chronic rejection in kidney transplant patients receiving cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with acyclovir.
Transplant Proc.
1995;
27
2040-2041
42
Jordan M L, Cook G T, Cardelle C J.
Ten years of experience with vascular complications in renal transplants.
J Urol.
1982;
128
689-692
43
Griffin J F, McNicholas M M.
Morphological appearance of renal allografts in transplant failure.
J Clin Ultrasound.
1992;
20
529-537
44
Jansen O, Rob P M, Schmidtke V. et al .
Follow-up study of renal transplants by duplex Doppler and grey scaleultrasound.
Eur J Radiol.
1992;
15
26-31
45
Renowden S A, Blethyn J, Cochlin D L.
Renal transplant sonography: correlation of Doppler and biopsy results in cellular rejection.
Clin Radiol.
1992;
46
265-269
46
Blane C E, Gagnadoux M F, Brunelle F. et al .
Doppler ultrasonography in the early postoperative evaluation of renal transplants in children.
Can Assoc Radiol J.
1993;
44
176-178
47
Saarinen O.
Diagnostic value of resistive index of renal transplants in the early postoperative period.
Acta Radiol.
1991;
32
166-169
48
Saarinen O, Salmela K, Edgren J.
Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of renal transplant artery stenosis-value of resistive index.
Acta Radiol.
1994;
35
586-589
49
Baxter G M, Ireland H, Moss J G. et al .
Colour Doppler ultrasound in renal transplant artery stenosis: which Doppler index?.
Clin Radiol.
1995;
50
618-622
50
Häyry P, Yilmaz S.
Chronic allograft rejection: An update.
Transplant Proc.
1994;
26
3159-3160
51
Bude R O, Rubin J M, Adler R D.
Power versus conventional color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of normal intrarenal vasculature.
Radiology.
1994;
192
777-780
52
Mutze S, Overhoff M, Filimonow S. et al .
Ultraschalldiagnostik der Transplantatniere.
Radiologe.
1996;
36
31-37
53
Pallardó L M, Sánchez J, Puig N. et al .
Chronic rejection in 500 kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine: incidence and risk factors.
Transplant Proc.
1995;
27
2215-2216
54
Fischer T, Mühler M, Kröncke T J. et al .
Early Postoperative Ultrasound of Kidney Transplants: Evaluation of Contrast Medium Dynamics Using Time-intensity Curves.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2004;
176
472-477
55
Pudszuhn A, Marx C, Malich A. et al .
Computerassistierte Quantifizierungsanalyse der kontrastmittelverstärkten Powerdoppler-Sonographie bei unklaren Herdbefunden der Mamma.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2003;
175
495-501
56
Dietrich C F.
Kontrastverstärkte 3D-Bildgebung unter Echtzeitbedingungen, eine neue Technik.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2002;
174
160-163
57
Hohmann J, Skrok J, Puls R. et al .
Charakterisierung fokaler Leberläsionen mit kontrastmittelgestütztem „low MI real time” Ultraschall und SonoVue.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2003;
175
835-843
58
Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Calderan L. et al .
US characterization of focal hepatic lesions with intermittent high-acoustic-power mode and contrast material.
Acad Radiol.
2003;
10
739-750
59
Basilico R, Blomley M J, Harvey C J. et al .
Which continuous US scanning mode is optimal for the detection of vascularity in liver lesions when enhanced with a second generation contrast agent?.
Eur J Radiol.
2002;
41
184-191
60
Schlosser T, Pohl C, Veltmann C.
Feasibility of the flash-replenishment concept in renal tissue: which parameters affect the assessment of the contrast replenishment?.
Ultrasound Med Biol.
2001;
27
937-944
61
Wei K, Le E, Bin J P. et al .
Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2001;
37
1135-1140
62
Girard M S, Mattrey R F, Baker K G. et al .
Comparison of Standard and Second Harmonic B-mode Sonography in the Detection of Segmental Renal Infarction with SonographicContrast in a Rabbit Model.
J Ultrasound Med.
2000;
19
185-192
63
Nilsson A.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys.
Eur Radiol.
2004;
Vol 14/Suppl 8/October 2004
104-109
64
Bokor D, Chambers J B, Rees P J. et al .
Clinical safety of SonoVue, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Invest Radiol.
2001;
36
104-109
65
Correas J M, Claudon M, Tranquart F. et al .
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: renal applications.
J Radiol.
2003;
84
2041-2054
66
Lucidarme O, Franchi-Abella S, Correas J M. et al .
Blood flow quantification with contrast-enhanced US: „entrance in the section” phenomenon-phantom and rabbit study.
Radiology.
2003;
228
298-299
67
Nahar T, Li P, Kuersten B. et al .
Detection of resting myocardial perfusion defects by SonoVue myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Echocardiography.
2003;
20
511-517
68
Schlosser T, Veltmann C, Lohmaier S. et al .
Bestimmung des renalen Blutflusses in Makro- und Mikrozirkulation mittels Pulse Inversion Imaging.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2004;
176
724-730
69
Bouakaz A, Krenning B J, Vletter W B. et al .
Contrast superharmonic imaging: a feasibility study.
Ultrasound Med Biol.
2003;
29
547-553
70
Robbin M L, Lockhart M E, Barr R G.
Renal imaging with ultrasound contrast: current status.
Radiol Clin North Am.
2003;
41
963-978
71
Krix M, Kauczor H U, Delorme S.
Quantification of tissue perfusion with novel ultrasound methods.
Radiologe.
2003;
43
823-830
72
Pollard R E, Sadlowski A R, Bloch S H. et al .
Contrast-assisted destruction-replenishment ultrasound for the assessment of tumor microvasculature in a rat model.
Technol Cancer Res Treat.
2002;
1
459-470
73
Wei K, Jayaweera A R, Firoozan S. et al .
Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound - induced destruction of microbubbles administered as aconstant venous infusion.
Circulation.
1998;
97
473-483
74
Fischer T, Dieckhöfer J, Mühler M. et al .
The use of contrast-enhanced US in renal transplant: first results and potential clinical benefit.
Eur Radiol.
2005;
Vol 15/Suppl 5/December 2005, ECR 2005, Vienna, Austria
E109-116
75
Argalia G, Cacciamani L, Fazi R. et al .
Contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparison with MR-angiography.
Radiol Med.
2004;
107
208-217
76
Blebea J, Zickler R, Volteas N. et al .
Duplex imaging of the renal arteries with contrast enhancement.
Vasc Endovascular Surg.
2003;
37
429-436
77
Teixeira O U, Bortolotto L A, Siva H B.
The contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound with perfluorocarbon exposed sonicated albumin does not improve the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis compared with angiography.
J Negat Results Biomed.
2004;
3
3
78
Siracusano S, Quaia E, Bertolotto M. et al .
The application of ultrasound contrast agents in the charcterization of renal tumors.
World J Urol.
2004;
22
316-322
79
Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Magno C. et al .
Contrast-enhanced second - harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2004;
182
1525-1530
80
Kreft B, Schild H H.
Zystische Nierenläsionen.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2003;
175
892-903
81
Veltri A, De Fazio G, Malfitana V. et al .
Percutaneous US-guided RF thermal ablation for malignant renal tumors: preliminary results in 13 patients.
Eur Radiol.
2004;
14
2303-2310
82
Delorme S, Krix M, Albrecht T.
Ultraschallkontrastmittel - Grundlagen und klinische Anwendung.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2006;
178
155-164
Dr. Thomas Fischer
Institut für Radiologie, Charité Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Schumannstraße 20/21
10117 Berlin
Telefon: ++49/30/4 50 62 72 38
Fax: ++49/30/4 50 52 79 09
eMail: thom.fischer@charite.de