Genetics of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

ABSTRACT

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a devastating reproductive problem affecting approximately 5% of couples trying to conceive. Genetic factors appear to be highly associated with reproductive loss. In this article, genetic factors are reviewed in terms of random numerical chromosome errors in miscarriage specimens and carriers of structural chromosome rearrangements that may result in unbalanced chromosome errors in pregnancies. Recently, research has generated interest in genetic markers for recurrent loss such as skewed X-chromosome inactivation and human leukocyte antigen-G polymorphisms. Assisted reproductive technologies (specifically, preimplantation genetic diagnosis) have been offered to couples with recurrent pregnancy loss; however, more data need to be evaluated before routine use can be advocated. Management of genetic factors in RPL should include therapy based on the highest level of evidence, genetic counseling, and close monitoring of subsequent pregnancies.

KEYWORDS

Recurrent pregnancy loss - recurrent miscarriage - cytogenetics - translocations - preimplantation genetic diagnosis

REFERENCES

• 1 Stephenson M D. Recurrent pregnancy loss: clinical evidence for suboptimal implantation.  Infert Reprod Med Clin N Am. 2001;  12 447-461
• 2 Boue J, Bou A, Lazar P. Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions.  Teratology. 1975;  12 11-26
• 3 Edmonds D K, Lindsay K S, Miller J F, Williamson E, Wood P J. Early embryonic mortality in women.  Fertil Steril. 1982;  38 447-453
• 4 Wilcox A J, Weinberg C R, O'Connor J F et al.. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy.  N Engl J Med. 1988;  319 189-194
• 5 Ohno M, Maeda T, Matsunobu A. A cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions with direct analysis of chorionic villi.  Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  77 394-398
• 6 Jacobs P A, Hassold T. Chromosome abnormalities: origin and etiology in abortions and livebirths. In: Vogel F, Sperling K Human Genetics. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1987: 233-244
• 7 Simpson J L. Incidence and timing of pregnancy losses: relevance to evaluating safety of early prenatal diagnosis.  Am J Med Genet. 1990;  35 165-173
• 8 Neilson J, Wohert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark.  Hum Genet. 1991;  87 81-83
• 9 Hassold T, Chiu D. Maternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy.  Hum Genet. 1985;  70 11-17
• 10 Hawley R S, Frazier J A, Rasooly R. Separation anxiety: the etiology of nondisjunction in flies and people.  Hum Mol Genet. 1994;  3 1521-1528
• 11 Martin R H, Ko E, Rademaker A. Distribution of aneuploidy in human gametes: comparison between human sperm and oocytes.  Am J Med Genet. 1991;  39 321-331
• 12 Jacobs P A, Hassold T J. The origin of numerical chromosome abnormalities.  Adv Genet. 1995;  33 101-133
• 13 Rubio C, Gil-Salom M, Simon C et al.. Incidence of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in a risk population: relationship with sperm quality and ICSI outcome.  Hum Reprod. 2001;  16 2084-2092
• 14 Stephenson M D, Awartani K A, Robinson W P. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 446-451
• 15 Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J et al.. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions.  Ann Hum Genet. 1980;  44 151-178
• 16 Stephenson M D. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  66 24-29
• 17 Boue A, Gallano P. A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses.  Prenat Diagn. 1984;  4(suppl) 45-67
• 18 Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Sato T, Suzumori N, Suzumori K. Poor prognosis of recurrent aborters with either maternal or paternal reciprocal translocations.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81 367-373
• 19 Goddijn M, Joosten J H, Knegt A C et al.. Clinical relevance of diagnosing structural chromosome abnormalities in couples with repeated miscarriage.  Hum Reprod. 2004;  19 1013-1017
• 20 Stephenson M D, Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a potential carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  , (in press)
• 21 Carp H, Feldman B, Oelsner G, Schiff E. Parental karyotype and subsequent live births in recurrent miscarriage.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81 1296-1301
• 22 Wolf G C, Horger III E O. Indications for examination of spontaneous abortion specimens: a reassessment.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  173 1364-1368
• 23 Bell K A, Van Deerlin P G, Haddad B R, Feinberg R F. Cytogenetic diagnosis of “normal 46,XX” karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading.  Fertil Steril. 1999;  71 334-341
• 24 Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E et al.. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions.  Am J Hum Genet. 2000;  66 1516-1521
• 25 Philipp T, Feichtinger W, Van Allen M I, Separovic E, Reiner A, Kalousek D K. Abnormal embryonic development diagnosed embryoscopically in early intrauterine deaths after in vitro fertilization: a preliminary report of 23 cases.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  82 1337-1342
• 26 Ferro J, Martinez M C, Lara C, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Serra V. Improved accuracy of hysteroembryoscopic biopsies for karyotyping early missed abortions.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  80 1260-1264
• 27 Lyon M. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.)  Nature. 1961;  190 372-373
• 28 Sangha K K, Stephenson M D, Brown C J, Robinson W P. Extremely skewed X-chromosome inactivation is increased in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.  Am J Hum Genet. 1999;  65 913-917
• 29 Uehara S, Hashiyada M, Sato K, Sato Y, Fujimori K, Okamura K. Preferential X-chromosome inactivation in women with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 908-914
• 30 Lanasa M C, Hogge W A, Kubik C, Blancato J, Hoffman E P. Highly skewed X-chromosome inactivation is associated with idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion.  Am J Hum Genet. 1999;  65 252-254
• 31 Beever C L, Stephenson M D, Penaherrera M S et al.. Skewed X-chromosome inactivation is associated with trisomy in women ascertained on the basis of recurrent spontaneous abortion or chromosomally abnormal pregnancies.  Am J Hum Genet. 2003;  72 399-407
• 32 Robinson W P, Beever C, Brown C J, Stephenson M D. Skewed X inactivation and recurrent spontaneous abortion.  Semin Reprod Med. 2001;  19 175-181
• 33 Ober C, Aldrich C L, Chervoneva I et al.. Variation in the HLA-G promoter region influences miscarriage rates.  Am J Hum Genet. 2003;  72 1425-1435
• 34 Karhukorpi J, Laitinen T, Tiilikainen A S. HLA-G polymorphism in Finnish couples with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;  104 1212-1214
• 35 Penzes M, Rajczy K, Gyodi E, Reti M, Feher E, Petranyi G. HLA-G gene polymorphism in the normal population and in recurrent spontaneous abortion in Hungary.  Transplant Proc. 1999;  31 1832-1833
• 36 Pfeiffer K A, Fimmers R, Engels G, van der Ven H, van der Ven K. The HLA-G genotype is potentially associated with idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;  7 373-378
• 37 Aldrich C L, Stephenson M D, Karrison T et al.. HLA-G genotypes and pregnancy outcome in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;  7 1167-1172
• 38 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics .Management of recurrent early pregnancy loss. Number 24, February 2001. The 2005 Compendium of Selected Publications. Washington, DC; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2005
• 39 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists .The Investigation and Treatment of Couples with Recurrent Miscarriage. RCOG Guideline No. 17 2003 London: United Kingdom; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
• 40 Edwards R G, Gardner R L. Choosing sex before birth.  New Scientist. 1968;  38 218-220
• 41 Harper J C, Coonen E, Ramaekers F C et al.. Identification of the sex of human preimplantation embryos in two hours using an improved spreading method and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) using directly labelled probes.  Hum Reprod. 1994;  9 721-724
• 42 Egozcue J, Santalo J, Gimenez C et al.. Preimplantation genetic screening and human implantation.  J Reprod Immunol. 2002;  55 65-72
• 43 Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Evsikov S, Galat V, Kuliev A. Nuclear transfer for full karyotyping and preimplantation diagnosis for translocations.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;  5 300-305
• 44 Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J et al.. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 2191-2199
• 45 Delhanty J D. Chromosome analysis by FISH in human preimplantation genetics.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 153-155
• 46 Colls P, Blanco J, Martinez-Pasarell O et al.. Chromosome segregation in a man heterozygous for a pericentric inversion, inv(9)(p11q13), analyzed by using sperm karyotyping and two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization on sperm nuclei.  Hum Genet. 1997;  99 761-765
• 47 Munne S, Morrison L, Fung J et al.. Spontaneous abortions are reduced after preconception diagnosis of translocations.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;  15 290-296
• 48 Vidal F, Gimenez C, Rubio C et al.. FISH preimplantation diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy in recurrent pregnancy wastage.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;  15 310-313
• 49 Pellicer A, Rubio C, Vidal F et al.. In vitro fertilization plus preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage: an analysis of chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos.  Fertil Steril. 1999;  71 1033-1039
• 50 Munne S, Sandalinas M, Magli C et al.. Inereased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous areuploid conceptions.  Prenat Diagnosis. 2004;  24 638-643
• 51 Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munne S et al.. Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  82 292-294
• 52 Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F et al.. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18 182-188
• 53 Staessen C, Platteau P, Van A E et al.. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Hum Reprod. 2004;  19 2849-2858
• 54 Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Van S A, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  83 393-397
• 55 Clifford K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in unexplained recurrent first trimester miscarriage.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 387-389