Laryngorhinootologie 2006; 85(2): 86-89
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-933300
Tipps + Tricks

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die epithetische Versorgung des dysmorphen Tracheostomas nach Laryngektomie

Prosthesis for the Dysmorphic Tracheostoma after Laryngectomy Th. K.  Hoffmann, M. Heisterkamp, W. Angerstein, K. Scheckenbach, H. Bier, S. Horlitz
  • Düsseldorf
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 February 2006 (online)

Also available at
 

Abstract

After laryngectomy, the tracheostoma forms a functional center for breathing and phonation. Form, size and position of the tracheostoma affect the quality of the tracheoesophageal voice. A rare but absolutely typical problem arises from a large and irregularly formed tracheostoma making a sufficient mechanical closing difficult or rather impossible. As an alternative to surgical correction of such a dysmorphic tracheostoma we inserted individually adjusted tracheostoma silicon prosthesis. In this study comprising 21 patients, the subjective assessment of voice quality and breathing function was monitored by a standardized interview as well as the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Additionally, 7 patients were evaluated clinically. Compared to the standard speech silicon canula a significant improvement of voice function (prolonged voice production and less peristomal noise) was achieved using the tracheostoma prosthesis without increasing airway resistance during breathing. Besides, there was a close correlation between self-evaluation and total VHI score. Light local skin reactions were described by 1/4 of the patients caused by the applied medical adhesive. In general the prosthesis was used 20 hours by the patients, its durability (loss of elasticity, discoloration) was estimated to 2 years. According to our experience, the tracheostoma silicon prosthesis represents an effective alternative to a surgical revision of a dysmorphic tracheostoma after laryngectomy.

Literatur

  • 1 Blom ED . Singer M . Hamaker RC . Tracheostoma valve for postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1982;  91 573
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hess M . Gross M . Rosler H . Horlitz S . Individual adjustment of tracheal valves in voice prosthesis patients with morphologically aberrant stoma relations.  Folia Phoniatr. 1993;  45 130-134
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Jacobson BH . Johnson A . Grywalskic C . et al . Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and validation.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;  6 66-70
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Nawka T . Wiesmann U . Gonnermann U . Validierung des Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in der deutschen Fassung.  HNO. 2003;  51 921-929
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Schuster M . Lohscheller J . Hoppe U . Kummer P . Eysholdt U . Rosanowski F . Voice handicap of laryngectomees with tracheoesophageal speech.  Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2004;  56 62-67
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Stewart MG . Chen AY . Stach CB . Outcomes analysis of voice and quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;  124 143-148
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nigam A . Campbell JB . Dasgupta AR . Does the location of the laryngectomy stoma influence its ultimate size?.  Clin Otolaryngol. 1993;  18 193-195
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Bunting GW . Voice following laryngeal cancer surgery: troubleshooting common problems after tracheoesophageal voice restoration.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004;  37 597-612
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar