PDF herunterladen
Radiologie up2date 2006; 6(3): 255-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944701
Interventionelle Radiologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Perkutane Vertebroplastie und Kyphoplastie

Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplastyS.  G.  Wetzel1 , K. E. Wilhelm2
  • 1Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Universitätsspital Basel
  • 2Radiologische Universitätsklinik Bonn
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
19. September 2006 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Zusammenfassung

Die perkutane Vertebroplastie (PVP) ist ein minimalinvasives Verfahren, bei welchem unter radiologischer Kontrolle Knochenzement in einen Wirbelkörper eingebracht wird. Die Technik wurde ursprünglich zur Behandlung aggressiver Wirbelkörperhämangiome eingesetzt; inzwischen stellen osteoporotische Wirbelkörperfrakturen und andere schmerzhafte Wirbelkörperprozesse - vornehmlich Metastasen - die Hauptindikationen dar. Bei der mit der PVP verwandten Kyphoplastie (KP) werden expandierbare Ballons in den Wirbelkörper eingebracht und nachfolgend die entstandene Kavität mit Zement gefüllt. Hiermit wird neben der Schmerztherapie und Stabilisierung eine Reposition und Korrektur einer lokalen Kyphose angestrebt.

Dieser Artikel erläutert die Indikationen der Verfahren, wobei der Wert einer interdisziplinären Diskussion betont wird, die es erleichtert, alternative Therapien zu erwägen und die optimale Behandlung für den Patienten zu gewährleisten. In einem zweiten Schritt werden die technischen Aspekte der Verfahren erläutert und potenzielle Komplikationen der Verfahren dargestellt. Schließlich werden die Therapieresultate der PVP und der KP unter Bezugnahme auf die bislang publizierten Arbeiten und eigene Erfahrungen dargestellt und diskutiert.

>Abstract

With percutaneous vertebroplasty, a minimal invasive method, bone cement is injected under radiological control into a vertebra. The technique was first applied for treatment of aggressive hemangiomas. Today, osteoporotic compression fractures and other vertebral pathologies that cause pain - foremost metastasis - are the main indications for PVP. Kyphoplasty (KP) is closely related to PVP; with this technique expandable balloons are introduced into a vertebra and the cavity is then filled with bone cement. Apart from pain treatment and stabilisation of the vertebra, the aim of the method is to restore and correct a local kyphosis.

In this article the indications for both PVP and KP are discussed and the value of an interdisciplinary discussion that takes alternative therapeutic methods into account is stressed. Additionally, the technical aspects and the potential complications of the methods are explained. Finally, the therapeutic results of PVP and KP are reviewed in light of published results and our own experiences.

Key words

Percutaneous vertebroplasty; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporosis; Spinal tumors

Literatur

  • 1 Helmberger T, Bohndorf K, Hierholzer J, Noldge G, Vorwerk D. Guidelines of the German Radiological Society for percutaneous vertebroplasty.  Radiologe. 2003;  43 703-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 McGraw J K, Cardella J, Barr J D. et al . Society of interventional radiology quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  14 S311-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gangi A, Sabharwal T, Irani F G, Buy X, Morales J P, Adam A. Quality assurance guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;  29 173-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Black D M, Palermo L, Nevitt M C, Genant H K, Christensen L, Cummings S R. Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.  J Bone Miner Res. 1999;  14 90-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Melton L J 3rd. How many women have osteoporosis now?.  J Bone Miner Res. 1995;  10 175-177
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Riggs B L, Melton L J 3rd. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology.  Bone. 1995;  17 505S-511S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cooper C, Atkinson E J, O'Fallon W M, Melton L J 3rd. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985 - 1989.  J Bone Miner Res. 1992;  7 221-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kaufmann T J, Jensen M E, Schweickert P A, Marx W F, Kallmes D F. Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;  22 1860-1863
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brown D B, Gilula L A, Sehgal M, Shimony J S. Treatment of chronic symptomatic vertebral compression fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  182 319-322
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stallmeyer M J, Zoarski G H, Obuchowski A M. Optimizing patient selection in percutaneous vertebroplasty.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  14 683-696
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tanigawa N, Komemushi A, Kariya S. et al . Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: Relationship between Vertebral Body Bone Marrow Edema Pattern on MR Images and Initial Clinical Response.  Radiology. 2006;  239 195-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Maynard A S, Jensen M E, Schweickert P A, Marx W F, Short J G, Kallmes D F. Value of bone scan imaging in predicting pain relief from percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;  21 1807-1812
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Peh W C, Gilula L A, Peck D D. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures.  Radiology. 2002;  223 121-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mathis J M, Ortiz A O, Zoarski G H. Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;  25 840-845
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Da Fonseca K, Grafe I, Hillmeier J. et al . Kyphoplastie mit „Biozement”.  Journal für Mineralstoffwechsel. 2004;  11 (Sonderheft 1) 16-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Watts N B, Harris S T, Genant H K. Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.  Osteoporos Int. 2001;  12 429-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lieberman I H, Dudeney S, Reinhardt M K, Bell G. Initial outcome and efficacy of „kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.  Spine. 2001;  26 1631-1638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Klimo P jr, Schmidt M H. Surgical management of spinal metastases.  Oncologist. 2004;  9 188-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Weill A, Chiras J, Simon J M, Rose M, Sola-Martinez T, Enkaoua E. Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement.  Radiology. 1996;  199 241-247
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Brado M, Hansmann H J, Richter G M, Kauffmann G W. Interventional therapy of primary and secondary tumors of the spine.  Orthopade. 1998;  27 269-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chow E, Holden L, Danjoux C. et al . Successful salvage using percutaneous vertebroplasty in cancer patients with painful spinal metastases or osteoporotic compression fractures.  Radiother Oncol. 2004;  70 265-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dudeney S, Lieberman I. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study.  J Rheumatol. 2000;  27 2526
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Masala S, Lunardi P, Fiori R. et al . Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the treatment of malignant vertebral fractures.  J Chemother. 2004;  16 (Suppl 5) 30-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fourney D R, Schomer D F, Nader R. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients.  J Neurosurg. 2003;  98 21-30
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Wilhelm K, Stoffel M, Ringel F. et al . Preliminary experience with balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures.  Rofo. 2003;  175 1690-1696
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, Le G ars. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Technique, indications, and results.  Radiol Clin North Am. 1998;  36 533-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Martin J B, Jean B, Sugiu K. et al . Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results.  Bone. 1999;  25 11S-15S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Peh W C, Gilula L A. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: an update.  Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;  26 52-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cardon T, Hachulla E, Flipo R M. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of a Langerhans cell vertebral histiocytosis.  Clin Rheumatol. 1994;  13 518-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Paul L, Santonja C, Izquierdo E. Complete necrosis of a spinal giant cell tumor after vertebroplasty.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;  17 727-731
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gangi A, Kastler B A, Dietemann J L. Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;  15 83-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Huegli R W, Schaeren S, Jacob A L, Martin J B, Wetzel S G. Percutaneous cervical vertebroplasty in a multifunctional image-guided therapy suite: hybrid lateral approach to C1 and C4 under CT and fluoroscopic guidance.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;  28 649-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Martin J B, Wetzel S G, Seium Y. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty in metastatic disease: transpedicular access and treatment of lysed pedicles-initial experience.  Radiology. 2003;  229 593-597
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Martin J B, Gailloud P, Dietrich P Y. et al . Direct transoral approach to C2 for percutaneous vertebroplasty.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;  25 517-519
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gailloud P, Martin J B, Olivi A, Rufenacht D A, Murphy K J. Transoral vertebroplasty for a fractured C2 aneurysmal bone cyst.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;  13 340-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wetzel S G, Martin J B, Somon T, Wilhelm K, Rufenacht D A. Painful osteolytic metastasis of the atlas: treatment with percutaneous vertebroplasty.  Spine. 2002;  27 E493-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lieberman I H, Togawa D, Kayanja M M. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: filler materials.  Spine J. 2005;  5 305S-316S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 San Millan Ruiz D, Burkhardt K, Jean B. et al . Pathology findings with acrylic implants.  Bone. 1999;  25 85S-90S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Barragan-Campos H M, Vallee J N, Lo D. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases: complications.  Radiology. 2006;  238 354-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hochmuth K, Proschek D, Schwarz W, Mack M, Kurth A A, Vogl T J. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the therapy of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a critical review.  Eur Radiol. 2006;  35 616-625
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bouza C, Lopez T, Magro A, Navalpotro L, Amate J M. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review.  Eur Spine J. 2006;  15 1050-1067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Garfin S R, Yuan H A, Reiley M A. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures.  Spine. 2001;  26 1511-1515
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Heini P F, Walchli B, Berlemann U. Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results. A prospective study for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures.  Eur Spine J. 2000;  9 445-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 McGraw J K, Lippert J A, Minkus K D, Rami P M, Davis T M, Budzik R F. Prospective evaluation of pain relief in 100 patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty: results and follow-up.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;  13 883-886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Evans A J, Jensen M E, Kip K E. et al . Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty retrospective report of 245 cases.  Radiology. 2003;  226 366-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Coumans J V, Reinhardt M K, Lieberman I H. Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: 1-year clinical outcomes from a prospective study.  J Neurosurg. 2003;  99 44-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hodler J, Peck D, Gilula L A. Midterm outcome after vertebroplasty: predictive value of technical and patient-related factors.  Radiology. 2003;  227 662-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Cohen J E, Lylyk P, Ceratto R, Kaplan L, Umanskyt F, Gomori J M. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: technique and results in 192 procedures.  Neurol Res. 2004;  26 41-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Pflugmacher R, Kandziora F, Schroder R. et al . Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in osteoporotic fractures of vertebral bodies - a prospective 1-year follow-up analysis.  Rofo. 2005;  177 1670-1676
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Trout A T, Kallmes D F, Kaufmann T J. New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;  27 217-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

PD Dr. Stephan G. Wetzel

Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Institut für Radiologie

Universitätsspital Basel · Petersgraben 4 · Schweiz

Telefon: 061 265-4912

Fax: 061 265-4908

eMail: swetzel@uhbs.ch