The role of wireless capsule endoscopy in investigating unexplained iron deficiency anemia after negative endoscopic evaluation of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract

Introduction: Despite undergoing standard endoscopic diagnostic evaluation with eosophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy, up to 30 % of patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) have no definitive diagnosis. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the role of wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) in detecting lesions of the small bowel in patients with unexplained IDA after a negative endoscopic work-up.
Patients and methods: Between 1 December 2003 and 31 December 2004, 253 consecutive patients who had been referred because of unexplained IDA underwent eosophagogastroduodenoscopy with small-bowel biopsies and ileocolonoscopy. Endoscopic and histological investigations were negative in 51 of these patients (20.2 %) and WCE was performed. Air double-contrast enteroclysis was performed following WCE in all these patients.
Results: Wireless capsule endoscopy revealed one or more small-bowel lesions that were considered to be a likely cause of the IDA in 29/51 patients (57 %): angiodysplasias in twelve patients (23.5 %), multiple jejunal and/or ileal ulcers in six patients (11.7 %), multiple erosions in four patients (7.8 %), a solitary ulcer in three patients (5.9 %), polyps in two patients (3.9 %), and tumors in two patients (3.9 %). Enteroclysis revealed abnormal findings likely to cause IDA in only 6/51 patients (11.8 %): multiple ileal ulcers in three patients (5.9 %), tumors in two patients (3.9 %), and polyps in one patient (1.9 %) (enteroclysis vs. WCE, P < 0.0001). WCE revealed all of the radiographic findings and no adverse events were observed.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of investigating the small bowel with WCE in patients with unexplained IDA after negative standard endoscopic evaluation. Wireless capsule endoscopy is superior to enteroclysis for detecting lesions of the small bowel in patients with unexplained IDA and should be the next diagnostic test of choice after unremarkable standard endoscopic evaluation.

References

• 1 McIntyre A S, Long R G. Prospective survey of investigations in outpatients referred with iron deficiency anaemia.  Gut. 1993;  34 1102-1107
• 2 Looker A C, Dallman P R, Carroll M D. et al . Prevalence of iron deficiency in the United States.  JAMA. 1997;  277 973-976
• 3 Rockey D C. Occult gastrointestinal bleeding.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  341 38
• 4 Zuckerman G R, Prakash C, Askin M P, Lewis B S. AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  18 201-221
• 5 Goddard A F, McIntyre A S, Scott B B. Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia. British Society of Gastroenterology.  Gut. 2000;  46 (Suppl 3 - 4) IV1-IV5
• 6 Rockey D C, Cello J P. Evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with iron-deficieny anemia.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 1691-1695
• 7 Kepczyk T, Kadakia S C. Prospective evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with iron-deficiency anemia.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 1283
• 8 Chak A, Cooper G S, Canto M I. et al . Enteroscopy for the initial evaluation of iron deficiency.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 144-148
• 9 Tang S, Haber G. Capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gastrointest Clin N Am. 2004;  14 87-100
• 10 Triester S L, Leighton J A, Leontiadis G I. et al . A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure GI bleeding.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 2407-2418
• 11 Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R. et al . Meta-analysis: capsule enteroscopy vs. conventional modalities in diagnosis of small bowel diseases.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;  22 595-604
• 12 Barkin J S, O’Loughlin C. Capsule endoscopy contraindications: complications and how to avoid their occurrence.  Gastrointest Clin N Am. 2004;  14 61-65
• 13 Viazis N, Sgouros S, Papaxoinis K. et al . Bowel preparation increases the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 534-538
• 14 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Gaudin J L. et al . Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 567-584
• 15 Maglinte D DT, Elmore M F, Chernish S M. et al . Enteroclysis in the diagnosis of chronic unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 403-405
• 16 Gasche C, Lomer M CE, Cavill I, Weiss G. Iron, anaemia, and inflammatory bowel diseases.  Gut. 2004;  53 1190-1197
• 17 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Vahedi K. et al . Clinical impact of capsule endoscopy compared to push enteroscopy: 1-year follow-up study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 318-323
• 18 Neu B, Ell C, May A. et al . Capsule endoscopy versus standard tests in influencing management of obscure digestive bleeding: results from a German multicenter study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 1-7
• 19 Mishkin D S, Chuttani R, Croffie J. et al . ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report: wireless capsule endoscopy. Technology Assessment Committee ASGE.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 539-545
• 20 Matsumoto T, Esaki M, Moriyam T. et al . Comparison of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with the double-balloon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyposis.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 827-832
• 21 Zaman A, Sheppard B, Katon R M. Total peroral intraoperative enteroscopy for obscure GI bleeding using a dedicated push enteroscope: diagnostic yield and patient outcome.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 506-510
• 22 Lewis B S, Eisen G M, Friedman S. A pooled analysis to evaluate results of capsule endoscopy trials.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 960-965
• 23 Pennazio M, Eisen G, Goldfarb N. ICCE consensus for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1046-1050