Background and study aim: The correct placement of an enteral feeding tube in the duodenum in critically ill patients is usually controlled radiographically. However, a direct bedside method that obviates the need for exposure to radiation would be preferable. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of bedside sonographic position control for placing enteral feeding tubes in critically ill patients.
Patients and methods: After placement of the enteral feeding tube, the position of the tip was determined using bedside transabdominal ultrasound. Native ultrasound was enhanced by injection of air bubbles into the feeding tube. The tube was regarded as being correctly positioned when the tube was visualized within the second or third parts of the duodenum. Plain abdominal radiographs with contrast served as the gold standard test.
Results: A total of 76 consecutive examinations were analyzed. In 12 patients, access to the upper abdominal wall was not possible because of open wounds; in another 13 patients who had undergone extensive abdominal surgery, the duodenum could not be identified and so no conclusion could be reached regarding the position of the tube. In 51/76 patients (67 %) ultrasound identified the duodenum and it was possible to determine the position of the tube (46 true positives and 2 true negatives); the position was incorrectly diagnosed in three patients. The sensitivity was 96 % (95 %CI 87 % - 98 %) and the specificity was 50 % (95 %CI 36 % - 65 %), with a positive predictive value of 94 %.
Conclusions: Bedside sonographic control of the positioning of enteral feeding tubes is very sensitive and can be a valuable alternative to radiological control, especially in patients without open abdominal wounds, external installations, or extensive abdominal surgery.
References
-
1
Harrison A M, Clay B, Grant M J. et al .
Nonradiographic assessment of enteral feeding tube position.
Crit Care Med.
1997;
25
2055-2059
-
2
Metheny N, Reed L, Wiersema L. et al .
Effectiveness of pH measurements in predicting feeding tube placement: an update.
Nurs Res.
1993;
42
324-331
-
3
Neumann M J, Meyer C T, Dutton J L. et al .
Hold that X-ray: aspirate pH and auscultation prove enteral tube placement.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1995;
20
293-295
-
4
Araujo-Preza C E, Melhado M E, Gutierrez F J. et al .
Use of capnometry to verify feeding tube placement.
Crit Care Med.
2002;
30
2255-2259
-
5
Metheny N, Reed L, Berglund B. et al .
Visual characteristics of aspirates from feeding tubes as a method for predicting tube location.
Nurs Res.
1994;
43
282-287
-
6
Berger M M, Werner D, Revelly J P. et al .
Serum paracetamol concentration: an alternative to X-rays to determine feeding tube location in the critically ill.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2003;
27
151-155
-
7
Kulling D, Bauerfeind P, Fried M.
Transnasal versus transoral endoscopy for the placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in critically ill patients.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2000;
52
506-510
-
8
Hernandez-Socorro C R, Marin J, Ruiz-Santana S. et al .
Bedside sonographic-guided versus blind nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients.
Crit Care Med.
1996;
24
1690-1694
-
9 Bernard R. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 5th edn. Pacific Grove (CA); Duxbury 2000: 759
-
10
Heyland D K, Drover J W, MacDonald S. et al .
Effect of postpyloric feeding on gastroesophageal regurgitation and pulmonary microaspiration: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Crit Care Med.
2001;
29
1495-1501
-
11
Greenberg M, Bejar R, Asser S.
Confirmation of transpyloric feeding tube placement by ultrasonography.
J Pediatr.
1993;
122
413-415
S. M. Wildi, M. D.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Department of Internal Medicine · University Hospital of Zurich · Rämistrasse 100 · 8091 Zurich · Switzerland
Fax: +01 255 45 03·
eMail: stephan.wildi@usz.ch
