Background and study aims: This study tested the diagnostic value of high-resolution endoscopy for the recognition of subtle diagnostic esophageal mucosal changes in nonerosive reflux disease.
Patients and methods: Ten control subjects and eleven patients with nonerosive reflux disease confirmed by a validated questionnaire, standard endoscopy, and 24-hour pH-metry participated in the study. Still images were collected by high-resolution endoscopes from the distal esophagus in a standardized manner, incorporating iodine staining. Assessments were repeated in the patients with reflux disease after 4 weeks of esomeprazole therapy. Interobserver variability in the recognition of the proposed criteria was initially evaluated by 27 endoscopists using an Internet-based process. After optimisation of image quality the evaluation was repeated face-to-face with six expert endoscopists.
Results: No criterion was identified in either assessment that was sufficiently sensitive and specific to patients with reflux disease to be clinically useful. The kappa value, used to assess interobserver variation, was acceptably high only for invisibility of palisade vessels (0.59). Triangular indentations, apical mucosal breaks, and pinpoint blood vessels at the squamocolumnar junction were identified more frequently in the patients with reflux disease (P < 0.05). These changes and the invisibility of the palisade vessels were significantly less prevalent in reflux patients after therapy (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Though some distal esophageal mucosal appearances observed with the high-resolution endoscope appeared to be related to nonerosive esophageal mucosal injury, none of these changes proved to be sufficiently sensitive and specific to justify their use as a diagnostic criterion for nonerosive reflux disease.
References
-
1
Armstrong D, Bennett J R, Blum A L. et al .
The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement.
Gastroenterology.
1996;
111
85-92
-
2
Lundell L R, Dent J, Bennett J R. et al .
Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification.
Gut.
1999;
45
172-180
-
3
Walshe P, Rowley H, Hone S. et al .
Is reflux noted at diagnostic rigid oesophagoscopy clinically significant?.
J Laryngol Otol.
2001;
115
552-554
-
4
Bruno M J.
Magnification endoscopy, high resolution endoscopy, and chromoscopy: towards a better optical diagnosis.
Gut.
2003;
52 (Suppl 4)
iv7-11
-
5
Carlsson R, Dent J, Bolling-Sternevald E. et al .
The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1998;
33
1023-1029
-
6
Ruth M, Hamelin B, Rohss K. et al .
The effect of mosapride, a novel prokinetic, on acid reflux variables in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
1998;
12
35-40
-
7
Misumi A, Kondou H, Murakami A. et al .
Endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis by the dye-spraying method.
Endoscopy.
1989;
21
1-6
-
8
Tam W.
Proposed new endoscopic criteria for minimal change reflux esophagitis based on magnification endoscopy (abstract 3439).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
AB119
-
9 Altman D G. Practical statistics for medical research. London; Chapman and Hall 1991
-
10
Weusten B L, Roelofs J M, Akkermans L M. et al .
The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data.
Gastroenterology.
1994;
107
1741-1745
-
11
Yoshikawa I, Yamasaki M, Yamasaki T. et al .
Lugol chromoendoscopy as a diagnostic tool in so-called endoscopy-negative GERD.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
698-703
-
12
Kiesslich R, Kanzler S, Vieth M. et al .
Minimal change esophagitis: prospective comparison of endoscopic and histological markers between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and normal controls using magnifying endoscopy.
Dig Dis.
2004;
22
221-227
A. Edebo, MD
Department of Gastro-Surgical Research
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
Fax: + 46-31-411882
eMail: anders.edebo@surgery.gu.se
