Flüssigkeitsmanagement - Pathophysiologische Grundlagen sowie intra- und perioperatives Monitoring

Zusammenfassung

Die pathophysiologischen Effekte der Flüssigkeits-und Volumentherapie beruhen auf den pharmakologischen Eigenschaften und der Menge der perioperativ infundierten Flüssigkeiten. Durch Veränderung der Gefäßpermeabiltät im Stressstoffwechsel führen Fehldosierungen, als auch Produktnebenwirkungen, zu einer Einschränkung der Organfunktion mit konsekutiv beeinträchtigtem postoperativen Outcome des Patienten. Durch ein situativ angepasstes Monitoring kann hier Kenntnis über den Volumenstatus des Patienten gewonnen werden, um Therapiefehler zu vermeiden.

Abstract

The pathophsiological effects of fluid and volume therapy depend on the pharmacological properties and the amount of the fluid infused during an operation. Because of changes of vessel permeability in stress metabolism, not only inappropriate doses but also substance side effects can lead to impaired organ function with a subsequent detrimental outcome for the patient. By means of a monitoring system adapted to the individual situation, knowledge about the patient's volume status can be obtained and therapeutic errors avoided.

Flüssigkeitsmanagement - Monitoring-Verfahren; Hyper- und Hypovolämie; Thermodilution; Volumenstatus; Volumentherapie - Pathophysiologie

Fluid management - monitoring - hyper- and hypovolemia - thermodilution - volume status - volume therapy - pathophysiology

Literatur

• 1 Hartl WH, Rittler P. Perioperative infusion therapy. Basic principles.  Chirurg. 2002;  73 1067-86
• 2 Nielsen OM, Engell HC. The importance of plasma colloid osmotic pressure for interstitial fluid volume and fluid balance after elective abdominal vascular surgery.  Ann.Surg. 1986;  203 25-9
• 3 Grocott MP, Mythen MG, Gan TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults.  Anesth.Analg. 2005;  100 1093-106
• 4 Rosenthal MH. Intraoperative fluid management-what and how much?.  Chest. 1999;  115 106S-12S
• 5 Mythen M, Vercueil A. Fluid balance.  Vox Sang. 2004;  87 77-81
• 6 Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess.  Br.J Anaesth. 2002;  89 622-32
• 7 Collins JV, Cochrane GM, Davis J, Benatar SR, Clark TJ. Some aspects of pulmonary function after rapid saline infusion in healthy subjects.  Clin Sci Mol.Med. 1973;  45 407-10
• 8 Prien T, Backhaus N, Pelster F, Pircher W, Bunte H, Lawin P. Effect of intraoperative fluid administration and colloid osmotic pressure on the formation of intestinal edema during gastrointestinal surgery.  J Clin Anesth. 1990;  2 317-23
• 9 Rackow EC, Falk JL, Fein IA. et al. . Fluid resuscitation in circulatory shock: a comparison of the cardiorespiratory effects of albumin, hetastarch, and saline solutions in patients with hypovolemic and septic shock.  Crit Care Med. 1983;  11 839-50
• 10 Warren BB, Durieux ME. Hydroxyethyl starch: safe or not?.  Anesth.Analg. 1997;  84 206-12
• 11 Laxenaire MC. (Substances responsible for peranesthetic anaphylactic shock. A third French multicenter study (1992-94)).  Ann.Fr.Anesth.Reanim. 1996;  15 1211-8
• 12 Choi PT, Yip G, Quinonez LG, Cook DJ. Crystalloids vs. colloids in fluid resuscitation: a systematic review.  Crit Care Med. 1999;  27 200-10
• 13 Boldt J, Lenz M, Kumle B, Papsdorf M. Volume replacement strategies on intensive care units: results from a postal survey.  Intensive Care Med. 1998;  24 147-51
• 14 Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ. et al. . Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution.  Intensive Care Med. 2000;  26 180-7
• 15 von Spiegel T, Hoeft A. (Transpulmonary indicator methods in intensive medicine) Transpulmonale Indikatorverfahren in der Intensivmedizin.  Anaesthesist. 1998;  47 220-8
• 16 Godje O, Hoke K, Lamm P. et al. . Continuous, less invasive, hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care after cardiac surgery.  Thorac.Cardiovasc.Surg. 1998;  46 242-9
• 17 Godje O, Peyerl M, Seebauer T, Dewald O, Reichart B. Reproducibility of double indicator dilution measurements of intrathoracic blood volume compartments, extravascular lung water, and liver function.  Chest. 1998;  113 1070-7
• 18 Sakka SG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients.  Chest. 2002;  122 2080-6
• 19 Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L. et al. . Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis.  Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;  21 132-8
• 20 Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M. et al. . Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery.  Anesth.Analg. 2001;  92 984-9
• 21 Fujita Y, Yamamoto T, Sano I, Yoshioka N, Hinenoya H. A comparison of changes in cardiac preload variables during graded hypovolemia and hypervolemia in mechanically ventilated dogs.  Anesth.Analg. 2004;  99 1780-6
• 22 Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS. et al. . Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients.  Intensive Care Med. 2003;  29 476-80
• 23 Siniscalchi A, Pavesi M, Piraccini E. et al. . Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index as a predictor of preload status in patients with low right ventricular ejection fraction during orthotopic liver transplantation.  Transplant Proc. 2005;  37 2541-3
• 24 Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients.  Anesth.Analg. 2000;  90 351-5