Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22(6): 429-432
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-947697
Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Microvascular Anastomoses in Plastic Surgery

Raffy L. Karamanoukian1 , David S. Finley1 , Gregory R.D Evans1 , Hratch L. Karamanoukian2 , 3
  • 1Aesthetic & Plastic Surgery Institute, University of California, Irvine, California
  • 2School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo
  • 3Center for Less Invasive Cardiac Surgery and Robotic Heart Surgery, Buffalo General Hospital at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Accepted: April 18, 2006

Publication Date:
07 August 2006 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

In this pilot trial in piglets, the authors demonstrated the feasibility of applying robot technology to vascular microsurgery. This preliminary work suggests certain advantages of the robot, which should encourage more rigorous study for its full exploitation.

KEYWORDS

Robotic-assisted surgery - microsurgery

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ballantyne G H. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1389-1402
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ruurda J P, van Vroonhoven T J, Broeders I A. Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;  84 223-226
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Schoor R A, Ross L, Niederberger C. Robotic assisted microsurgical vasal reconstruction in a model system.  World J Urol. 2003;  21 48-49
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Margossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T et al.. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis.  Fertil Steril. 1998;  70 530-534
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 1999;  9 107-113
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Prasad S M, Ducko C T, Stephenson E R et al.. Prospective clinical trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary grafting with 1 year follow-up.  Ann Surg. 2001;  233 725-732
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Diodato L H, Scarborough J E, Domkowski P W et al.. Robotically assisted versus conventional freehand technique during beating heart anastomoses of left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  73 825-829
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Siemionow M, Ozer K, Siemionow W, Lister G. Robotic assistance in microsurgery.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000;  16 643-649
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Boyd W D, Desai N D, Kiaii B et al.. A comparison of robot-assisted versus manually constructed endoscopic coronary anastomosis.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 839-842 discussion 842-843
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Godina M. Preferential use of end-to-side arterial anastomoses in free flap transfers.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;  64 673-682
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Raffy L KaramanoukianM.D. 

200 South Manchester Street

Suite 650, Orange, California 92868