Comparison between Transuncal Approach and Upper Vertebral Transcorporeal Approach for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy - A Preliminary Report

Abstract

Objective: The surgical treatments for unilateral cervical radiculopathy have been performed by either the anterior or posterior approach. The anterior approach has usually been used more than the posterior approach. The authors compared the results of newly advanced upper vertebral transcorporeal (UVTC) approach with those of the original transuncal (TU) approach in the anterior approach. Methods: The anterior cervical microforaminotomy was performed for 60 patients (male:female=40:20) from June, 2000 to October, 2003. 40 patients were treated by the TU approach while 20 patients were operated on by the new UVTC approach. The authors analyzed postoperative changes of disc height, the spinal instability, the average length of hospital stay, the degree of patients' satisfaction and complications from each approach. The mean follow-up period was 9.5 months. Results: In the TU approach, postoperative intervertebral disc height was decreased from 7.1±0.65 mm to 6.2±0.61 mm. In the UVTC approach, postoperative intervertebral disc height was decreased from 6.6±0.43 mm to 6.3±0.41 mm. The average length of hospital stay was 5.2 days for the TU approach and 3.4 days for the UVTC approach. In the TU approach, 28 patients experienced excellent results, 11 patients experienced good results, one patient who experienced a fair result was operated by anterior cervical fusion because of a recurrent herniated disc. In the UVTC approach, 16 patients had excellent results and four patients experienced good results. Conclusions: This comparative study demonstrates that the UVTC approach is a better surgical technique than the TU approach considering the preservation of disc height, spinal stability, length of hospital stay, degree of satisfaction and complications.

Key words

Anterior microforaminotomy - cervical vertebra - radiculopathy - intervertebral disc

References

• 1 Osti OL, Vernon RB. Annulus tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. An experimental study using an animal model.  Spine. 1990;  15 762-767
• 2 Jacobs B, Krueger EG, Leivy DM. Cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy. Results of anterior diskectomy and interbody fusion.  JAMA. 1970;  211 2135-2139
• 3 Park CH, Kim CJ, Chung KS. et al . Results of anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion.  J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 1996;  25 1371-1376
• 4 Kim DY, Kim WK, Lee SG. et al . Technical evolution of anterior microforaminotomy for unilateral cervical radiculopathy.  J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2004;  35 23-28
• 5 Jho HD, Kim WK, Kim MH. Anterior microforminotomy for treatment of cervical radiculopathy: Part I - Disc-preserving “functional cervical disc surgery”.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  51 ((Suppl 2)) 46-53
• 6 Jho HD. Microsurgical anterior cervical foramiotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation.  J Neurosurg. 1996;  84 155-160
• 7 Park SJ, Ha HG, Jung H. et al . Anterior cervical microforaminotomy: a minimally invasive anterolateral approach for spondylotic lesions.  J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2000;  29 87-94
• 8 White AA, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM. et al . Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine.  Clin Orthop. 1975;  109 85-96
• 9 Raynor RB. Anterior or posterior approach to the cervical spine: an anatomical and radiographic evaluation and comparison.  Neurosurgery. 1983;  2 7-13
• 10 Aldrich F. Posterolateral microdiscectomy for cervical monoradiculopathy caused by posterolateral soft cervical disc sequestration.  J Neurosurg. 1990;  72 370-377
• 11 Davis RA. A long-term outcome study of 170 surgically treated patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy.  Surg Neurol. 1996;  46 523-530
• 12 Kim YS, Kuh SU, Jin BH. et al . The result of posterior microforaminotomy for posterolateral herniation of cervical discs.  J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2001;  30 743-748
• 13 Kang DS, Ha YI, Choi SW. et al . Clinical analysis of surgically managed cervical spondylosis by anterior approach.  J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 1998;  27 1250-1256
• 14 Lee JC, Lee CY, Son EI. et al . Comparison of surgical results between anterior cervical interbody fusion (ACIF) and microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy (MACF) for cervical disc herniation.  J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 1999;  28 1173-1178
• 15 Jang WY, Kim KS, Lee JC. et al . Results of microsurgical anterolateral tunnel approach for cervical disc herniation.  J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2001;  30 600-604
• 16 Chen TY, Crawford NR, Sonntag VK. Biomechanical effects of progressive anterior cervical decompression.  Spine. 2001;  26 6-14
• 17 Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1958;  40 607-624
• 18 Snyder GM, Bernhardt AM. Anterior cervical fractional interspace decompression for treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A review of the 66 cases.  Clin Orthop. 1989;  246 92-99
• 19 Chung HY. A new technique for cervical simple discectomy through a small anterolateral exposure with emphasis on the importance of preserving the anterior soft tissue of the intervertebral space.  Abstract of the 7th International Congress of Neurological Surgery in München, July 1981; pp 12-18, Supplement to Neurochirugia. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag 1982 p 52
• 20 Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Jannetta PF. et al . Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 1: Treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1980;  53 1-11
• 21 Verbiest H. A lateral approach to the cervical spine: technique and indications.  J Neurosurg. 1968;  28 191-203
• 22 Hakuba A. Trans-unco-discal approach. A combined anterior and lateral approach to cervical discs.  J Neurogurg. 1976;  45 284-291
• 23 Yoshihasa K, Patrick SM, Kuniyoshi A. et al . The role of anteromedial foraminotomy and the uncovertebral joint in the stability of the cervical spine.  Spine. 1998;  20 1559-1565
• 24 Johnson JP, Filler AG, McBride DQ. et al . Anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radicular disease.  Spine. 2000;  25 905-909
• 25 Hacker RJ, Miller CG. Failed anterior cervical foraminotomy.  J Neurosurg (Spine 2). 2003;  98 126-130
• 26 Chen BH, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GBJ. Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy with fusion.  J Spinal Disord. 2001;  14 17-20
• 27 Kotani Y, McNulty PS, Abumi K. et al . The role of anteromedial foraminotomy and the uncovertebral joints in the stability of the cervical spine: a biomechanical study.  Spine. 1998;  23 1559-1565
• 28 Clausen JD, Goel VK, Traynelis VC. Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: quantification using a finite element model of the C5-C6 segment.  J Orthop Res. 1997;  15 342-347

Correspondence