Zusammenfassung
Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden unterschiedliche Methoden für die Behandlung der Nichtanlage unterer bleibender zweiter Prämolaren beschrieben und vorgestellt. In der Vergangenheit traf allein der Kieferorthopäde die notwendigen Entscheidungen für die Therapie solcher Patienten. Mit den inzwischen verbesserten Möglichkeiten, Lücken zu versorgen, kann Kieferchirurgen und Prothetikern eine wichtige Rolle bei der Behandlung zufallen. Der Kieferorthopäde lernt solche Personen möglicherweise bereits in kindlichem Alter kennen, einige seiner zu diesem Zeitpunkt getroffenen Entscheidungen werden jedoch lebenslange Folgen für die Patienten haben. Unser Beitrag unterstreicht die Bedeutung einer interdisziplinären Therapie von Patienten mit Nichtanlage der unteren zweiten Prämolaren für das bestmögliche Behandlungsergebnis, das ein solches Teamwork erreichen kann.
Abstract
This article has described and illustrated several methods of managing the patient who is congenitally missing mandibular second premolars. In the past, orthodontists primarily made the treatment decisions in these types of patients. However, with the addition of newer solutions to restoring edentulous spaces, surgeons and restorative dentists may play a significant role in helping to manage these types of orthodontic patients. Although the orthodontist may see these patients at a young age, some of the decisions that are made at that time will affect the patient for a lifetime. This article has emphasized the interdisciplinary aspects of treating a patient who is congenitally missing their mandibular second premolars, in order to provide the patient with the best possible result that teamwork dentistry can offer.
Schlüsselwörter
interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit - Nichtanlage von UK-Prämolaren
Key words
interdisciplinary treatment - congenitally missing mandibular premolars
Literatur
-
1
Spear F M, Mathews D M, Kokich V G.
Interdisciplinary management of single-tooth implants.
Semin Orthod.
1997;
3
45-72
-
2
Habsha E.
The incidence of pulpal complications and loss of vitality subsequent to full crown restorations.
Ont Dent.
1998;
75
19-21
-
3
Ketabi A R, Kaus T, Herdach F, Groten M, Axmann-Krcmar D, Probster L, Weber H.
Thirteen-year follow-up study of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.
Quintessence Int.
2004;
35
407-410
-
4
Zalkind M, Ever-Hadani P, Hochman N.
Resin-bonded fixed partial denture retention: a retrospective 13-year follow-up.
J Oral Rehabil.
2003;
30
971-977
-
5
Creugers N H, De Kanter R J, Verzijden C W, Van't Hof M A.
Risk factors and multiple failures in posterior resin-bonded bridges in a 5-year multi-practice clinical trial.
J Dent.
1998;
26
397-402
-
6
ADA Council on Scientific Affairs .
Dental Endosseous implants: an update.
J Am Dent Assoc.
2004;
135
92-97
-
7
Ostler M S, Kokich V G.
Alveolar ridge changes in patients congenitally missing mandibular second premolars.
J Prosthet Dent.
1994;
71
144-149
-
8
Kokich V G, Spear F M.
Guidelines for managing the orthodontic-restorative patient.
Semin Orthod.
1997;
3
3-20
-
9
Fudalej P, Kokich V G, Leroux B.
Determining the cessation of facial growth to facilitate placement of single-tooth implants.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
, [im Druck]
-
10
Chen S T, Darby I B, Adams G G, Reynolds E C.
A prospective clinical study of bone augmentation techniques at immediate implants.
Clin Oral Implants Res.
2005;
16
176-184
-
11
Jemt T, Lekholm U.
Single implants and buccal bone grafts in the anterior maxilla: Measurements of buccal crestal contours in a 6-year prospective clinical study.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.
2005;
7
127-135
-
12
Steppovich M L.
A clinical study on closing edentulous spaces in the mandible.
Angle Orthod.
1979;
49
227-233
-
13
Hom B M, Turley P K.
The effects of space closure of the mandibular first molar area in adults.
Am J Orthod.
1984;
85
457-469
-
14 Kokich V G. Comprehensive management of implant anchorage in the multidisciplinary patient. In: Higuchi KW (ed). Orthodontic Applications of Osseointegrated Implants. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. 2000; 21-32
-
15
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark P I.
A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw.
Int J Oral Surg.
1981;
10
387-416
-
16
Tarnow D P, Emtiaz S, Classi A.
Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1- to 5-year data.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
1997;
12
319-324
-
17
Piattelli A, Corigliano M, Scarano A, Costigliola G, Paolantonio M.
Immediate loading of titanium plasma-sprayed implants: an histologic analysis in monkeys.
J Periodontol.
1998;
69
321-327
-
18
Duyck J, Ronold H J, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen J E.
The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study.
Clin Oral Implants Res.
2001;
12
207-218
-
19
Fines C D, Rebellato J, Saiar M.
Congenitally missing mandibular second premolar: treatment outcome with orthodontic space closure.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2003;
123
676-682
-
20
Giancotti A, Greco M, Mampieri G, Arcuri C.
The use of titanium miniscrews for molar protraction in extraction treatment.
Prog Orthod.
2004;
5
236-247
-
21
Northway W.
Hemisection: one large stepp toward management of congenitally missing lower second premolars.
Angle Orthod.
2004;
74
792-799
-
22
Northway W M.
The nuts and bolts of hemisection treatment: managing congenitally missing mandibular second premolars.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2005;
127
606-610
Prof. Dr. V. G. Kokich
1950 South Cedar
USA-Tacoma WA 98405
Phone: +1/2 53/6 27 56 88
Fax: +1/2 53/2 72 67 19
Email: vgkokich@u.washington.edu
