Reoperation following Minimally Invasive Surgery: Are the “Rules” Different?

ABSTRACT

This article discusses various indications for reoperation and how employing laparoscopy at primary operation might affect the incidence, presentation, and treatment of common complications. The abdomen is likely to be far less hostile after laparoscopic surgery than after laparotomy. Adhesions to the anterior abdominal wall are minimal or absent. As a result, relaparoscopy is a reasonable diagnostic and often successful treatment modality in patients suspected of having intra-abdominal complications following laparoscopic operation. Laparoscopic success in dealing with acute bowel obstruction after laparoscopic surgery is related to the paucity of adhesions and unique mechanisms of obstruction that are localized and amenable to minimal dissection. The same mechanisms are also responsible for the increased risk of bowel necrosis associated with bowel obstruction after laparoscopic surgery. Limited experience with successful laparoscopic management of bleeding and anastomotic leak has been reported with the caveat that if the bleeding or contamination is excessive, cannot be identified and controlled quickly, or is unresponsive to a reasonable and brief effort using laparoscopy, a prompt laparotomy is indicated. Based on the current literature, it is reasonable to conclude that laparoscopic approaches to primary Crohn's disease and relaparoscopy for recurrence are an appropriate (perhaps the most appropriate) management strategy. Also, laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy is the preferred treatment for toxic ulcerative colitis. We conclude that laparoscopic reoperative surgery is feasible for the treatment of many complications following laparoscopic major abdominal surgery and bowel resection.

KEYWORDS

Laparoscopy - reoperative surgery - colon resection - complication - inflammatory bowel disease

REFERENCES

• 1 McCormick J T, Papasavas P K, Caushaj P F, Gagne D J. Laparoscopic revision of failed open bariatric procedures.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 413-415
• 2 Wu J, Birnbaum E, Kodner I, Fry R, Read T, Fleshman J. Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resections in patients with Crohn's disease: are abscesses, phlegmons, or recurrent disease contraindications?.  Surgery. 1997;  122 682-689
• 3 Papasavas P K, Caushaj P F, McCormick J T et al.. Laparoscopic management of complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 610-614
• 4 Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori H, Okabayashi K, Hibi T, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 970-973
• 5 Reissman P, Teoh T-A, Skinner K, Burns J, Wexner S D. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic anterior resection in a porcine model.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;  6 136-139
• 6 Alabaz O, Iroatulam A, Nessim A, Weiss E, Nogueras J, Wexner S. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Eur J Surg. 2000;  166 213-217
• 7 Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Arnaud J. Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1129-1133
• 8 Hiki N, Shimizu N, Yamaguchi H et al.. Manipulation of the small intestine as a cause of the increased inflammatory response after open compared with laparoscopic surgery.  Br J Surg. 2006;  93 195-204
• 9 Kalff J C, Schraut W H, Simmons R L, Bauer A J. Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus.  Ann Surg. 1998;  228 652-663
• 10 Schwarz N T, Kalff J C, Turler A et al.. Selective jejunal manipulation causes postoperative pan-enteric inflammation and dysmotility.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 159-169
• 11 Daphan C E, Agalar F, Hascelik G, Onat D, Sayek I. Effects of laparotomy, and carbon dioxide and air pneumoperitoneum, on cellular immunity and peritoneal host defenses in rats.  Eur J Surg. 1999;  165 253-258
• 12 Hanly E J, Mendoza-Sagaon M, Murata K, Hardacre J M, De Maio A, Talamini M A. CO₂ pneumoperitoneum modifies the inflammatory response to sepsis.  Ann Surg. 2003;  237 343-350
• 13 De Wilde R L. Goodbye to late bowel obstruction after appendectomy.  Lancet. 1991;  338 1012
• 14 Parker J, Sinaii N, Segars J, Godoy H, Winkle C, Stratton P. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic excision of endometriosis and lysis of adhesions.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  84 1457-1461
• 15 Duron J J, Hay J M, Msika S et al.. Prevalence and mechanisms of small intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective multicenter study. French Association for Surgical Research.  Arch Surg. 2000;  135 208-212
• 16 Higa K, Ho T, Boone K. Internal hernias after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: incidence, treatment and prevention.  Obes Surg. 2003;  13 350-354
• 17 Liauw J, Cheah W. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction.  Asian J Surg. 2005;  28 185-188
• 18 Jones D B, Callery M P, Soper N J. Strangulated incisional hernia at trocar site.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;  6 152-154
• 19 Patterson M, Walters D, Browder W. Post-operative bowel obstruction following laparoscopic surgery.  Am Surg. 1993;  59 656-657
• 20 Pickleman J, Lee R M. The management of patients with suspected early postoperative small bowel obstruction.  Ann Surg. 1989;  210 216-219
• 21 Caushaj P F. Fundamental principles and perioperative management. In: Jacobs M, Plasescia G, Caushaj PF Atlas of Laparoscopic Surgery. Baltimore, MD; Williams & Wilkins 1996: 13-15
• 22 Rohatgi A, Widdison A L. Left subcostal closed (Veress needle) approach is a safe method for creating a pneumoperitoneum.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;  14 278-280
• 23 Dexter S, Miller G, Davides D et al.. Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Am J Surg. 2000;  179 316-319
• 24 Tsalis K, Zacharakis E, Vasiliadis K et al.. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: management and outcome.  Am Surg. 2005;  71 1060-1065
• 25 Yau P, Watson D, Devitt P, Game P, Jamieson G. Early reoperation following laparoscopic antireflux surgery.  Am J Surg. 2000;  179 172-176
• 26 De Mulder W, Gillardin J, Hofman Y, Von Molhem Y. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis of the first 237 cases.  Acta Chir Belg. 2001;  101 25-30
• 27 Liu J, Bruch H, Farke S, Nolde J, Schwandner O. Stoma formation for fecal diversion: a plea for the laparoscopic approach.  Tech Coloproctol. 2005;  9 9-14
• 28 Ludwig K A, Milsom J W, Garcia-Ruiz A, Fazio V W. Laparoscopic techniques for fecal diversion.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 285-288
• 29 Boulez J, Espalieu Ph, Fontaumard E, Meeus P. Laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery; analysis of 113 cases.  Hepatogastroeneterology. 1997;  44 40-44
• 30 Lowney J K, Dietz D W, Birnbaum E H, Kodner I J, Mutch M G, Fleshman J W. Is there any difference in recurrence rates in laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease compared with conventional surgery? A long-term, follow-up study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49 58-63
• 31 Dunker M S, Bemelman W A, Slors J F, van Hogezand R A, Ringers J, Gouma D J. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 911-914
• 32 Bell R L, Seymour N E. Laparoscopic treatment of fulminant ulcerative colitis.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1778-1782
• 33 Marcello P W, Milsom J W, Wong S K, Brady K, Goormastic M, Fazio V W. Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1441-1445