Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 46(6): 348-351
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1010251
Original Cardiovascular

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Diagnostic Value of Procalcitonin: the Influence of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Aprotinin, SIRS, and Sepsis

U. Boeken, P. Feindt, T. Petzold, M. Klein, M. Micek, U. T. Seyfert1 , E. Mohan, H. D. Schulte, E. Gams
  • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 1Department of Hemostasiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

1998

Publikationsdatum:
19. März 2008 (online)

Abstract

Background: The reasons for a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following ECC are not yet fully understood. Procalcitonin (PCT) blood levels may distinguish between bacterial infections and a non-bacterial systemic inflammation. We investigated the influence of ECC, ECC modified by application of aprotinin, systemic inflammation, and bacterial infection on the PCT values. Methods: 20 CABG patients were randomized and divided in two groups. Group A served as the control group, while group B perioperatively received a high dose of aprotinin. Blood samples for measurement of PCT were taken 6 times perioperatively. Furthermore, blood samples were taken from 20 preoperatively comparable patients who suffered from bacterial infection (n = 10) (group C) or a SIRS (n = 10) (group D) after ECC; in these groups PCT was determined daily after the onset of inflammation. Results: There was no significant elevation of PCT in group A or B at any time. In sepsis patients a significant elevation of PCT was seen, with the peak level of 18.6 ± 6.3 ng/ml on the second day after diagnosis; the PCT level of SIRS patients remained constantly low (< 0.9 ng/ml). Conclusions: In this study it was demonstrated that ECC and the use of aprotinin did not have any influence on the secretion of PCT. A systemic bacterial infection caused a significant increase of PCT, whereas PCT values remained normal in case of a SIRS. So it seems to be possible to distinguish between a primary SIRS and a bacterial sepsis by means of PCT.

    >