Computer-Designed Implants for Fronto-Orbital Defect Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

Patients with complex defects of the frontal and orbital regions present a myriad of problems for the reconstructive surgeon. In this review, options that allow state-of-the-art reconstruction using computer-assisted implants will be illustrated. The advantages of such implants created with computer assistance will be reviewed as well as indications for their use.

KEYWORDS

Computer generation - computer models - porous polyethylene - cranial defects - orbital defects

REFERENCES

• 1 Gruss J S. Craniofacial osteotomies and rigid fixation in the correction of post-traumatic craniofacial defects. In: Yarumcuk MJ, Gruss JS, Manson PN Rigid Fixation of the Craniofacial Skeleton. Boston; Butterworth-Heinemann 1992
• 2 Jackson IT, Munro IR, Salyer KE, Whitaker LA Atlas of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. St. Louis; CV Mosby 1982
• 3 Frodel J L, Marentette L J. Lag screw fixation of the upper craniomaxillofacial skeleton.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;  119 297-304
• 4 Rish B L, Dillon J D, Meirowsky A M et al.. Cranioplasty: a review of 1,030 cases of penetrating head injury.  Neurosurgery. 1979;  4 381-385
• 5 Manson P N, Crawley W A, Hoopes J E. Fronto cranioplasty: risk factors and choices of cranial vault reconstruction material.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  77 888-893
• 6 Malis L I. Titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty.  Neurosurgery. 1989;  25 351-355
• 7 Couldwell W T, Stillerman C B, Dougherty W. Reconstruction of the skull base and cranium adjacent to sinuses with porous polyethylene implant: preliminary report.  Skull Base Surg. 1997;  7 57-63
• 8 Janecka I P. New reconstructive technologies in skull base surgery: role of titanium mesh and porous polyethylene.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;  126 369-401
• 9 Rubin J P, Yarumcuk M J. Complications and toxicities of implantable materials used in facial reconstruction in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 1336-1353
• 10 Friedman C D, Costantino P D, Snyderman C H et al.. Reconstruction of the frontal sinus and frontofacial skeleton with hydroxyapatite cement.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;  2 124-129
• 11 Gosain A K. Hydroxyapatite cement paste cranioplasty for the treatment of temporal hollowing after cranial vault remodeling in a growing child.  J Craniofac Surg. 1997;  8 506-510
• 12 Burstein F D, Coen S R, Hudgins R et al.. The use of hydroxyapatite cement in secondary craniofacial reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 1270-1276
• 13 Sharma R K. Marriage of autogenous bone and hydroxyapatite cement for reconstruction of frontal bone defect.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  116 1568-1569
• 14 Lee S, Frodel J L. The use of high-density polyethylene implants in facial deformities.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;  124 1219-1223
• 15 Wellisz T, Dougherty W, Gross J. Craniofacial applications for Medpore porous polyethylene Flexblock implant.  J Craniofac Surg. 1992;  3 101-107
• 16 Couldwell W T, Chen T C, Weiss M H et al.. Cranioplasty with the Medpore porous polyethylene Flexblock implant.  J Neurosurg. 1994;  81 483-486
• 17 Couldwell W T. Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction.  Neurosurg Focus. 2004;  16 1-3
• 18 Chim H, Shantz J T. New frontiers in calvarial reconstruction: integrating computer-assisted design and tissue engineering in cranioplasty.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  116 1726-1741
• 19 Liu J K, Gottfried O N, Cole C D et al. Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction.  Neurosurg Focus.  2004;  16 1-5
• 20 Schlegel J, Green S. Polyetheretherketones (PEEK)-a biocompatible high performance plastic.  Medical Plastics. 2000;  14 12.1-12.9
• 21 Scolozzi P, Martinez A, Jaques B. Complex orbito-frontotemporal reconstruction using computer-designed PEEK implant.  J Craniofac Surg. 2007;  18 224-228