Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Skills of Neurosurgeons versus General Surgeons: Is there a Difference in the First Exposure to a Virtual Reality Simulator?

Abstract

Objective: The increasing use of minimally invasive surgery, which has a longer learning curve compared to open surgery lets the necessity to develop training programs to improve endoscopic skills of trainees become ever clearer. The aim of this study was to compare the endoscopic skills of neurosurgeons versus general surgeons at first exposure to a virtual reality simulator.

Methods: 72 general surgeons who visited the 122nd Conference of the German Surgeons Society (DGCH in Munich 2005) and 35 neuroendoscopic surgeons, who visited the Third World Conference of the International Study Group of Neuroendoscopy (ISGNE in Marburg 2005) participated in this study. Each participant performed the basic module “clip application” on the virtual reality simulator (LapSim^®). All participants were given the same pretest instructions. Time to complete the task, error score and economy of motion were recorded.

Results: The general surgeons performed the clip application faster, but with more errors than neuroendoscopic surgeons. However, the difference of both parameters was not significant. Both surgeon groups have a similar score for economy of motion.

Conclusion: Although neuroendoscopic surgeons were exposed to a foreign procedure and unfamiliar equipment, they were able to perform virtual endoscopy with similar accuracy as general surgeons, who are adapted to these endoscopic instruments and procedures and do these daily.

Key words

Simulation - minimal invasive surgery - neuroendoscopic surgery - virtual reality - LapSim

References

• 1 Hellwig D, Grotenhuis JA, Tirakotai W, Riegel T, Schulte DM, Bauer BL, Bertalanffy H. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus.  Neurosurg Rev. 2005;  28 1-38
• 2 Moore MJ, Bennett CL. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club.  Am J Surg. 1995;  170 55-59
• 3 Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, Gourash W. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 212-215
• 4 Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.  Am J Surg. 1993;  165 9-14
• 5 Luthy C, Perrier A, Perrin E, Cedraschi C, Allaz AF. Exploring the major difficulties perceived by residents in training: a pilot study.  SMW. 2004;  134 612-617
• 6 Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills.  Am J Surg. 2003;  185 146-149
• 7 Hassan I, Sitter H, Schlosser K, Zielke A, Rothmund M, Gerdes B. A virtual reality simulator for objective assessment of surgeons’ laparoscopic skill.  Chirurg. 2005;  76 151-156
• 8 Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Abel T, Buddeberg C. Junior physicians' workplace experiences in clinical fields in German-speaking Switzerland.  SMW. 2005;  135 19-26
• 9 Ro CY, Toumpoulis IK, Ashton Jr RC, Jebara T, Schulman C, Todd GJ, Derose J, MacGinty J. The LapSim: a learning environment for both experts and novices.  Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;  111 414-417
• 10 Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Broeders IA, Tseng LN. The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course-improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 1220-1226
• 11 Eriksen JR, Grantcharov T. Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 1216-1219
• 12 Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.  Ann Surg. 2002;  236 458-463
• 13 Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.  Br J Surg. 2004;  91 146-150
• 14 Grantcharov TP, Carstensen L, Schulze S. Objective assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy skills using a virtual reality simulator.  JSLS. 2005;  9 130-133
• 15 Wolfsberger S, Forster MT, Donat M, Neubauer A, Buhler K, Wegenkittl R, Czech T, Hainfellner JA, Knosp E. Virtual endoscopy is a useful device for training and preoperative planning of transsphenoidal endoscopic pituitary surgery.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2004;  47 214-220
• 16 Riegel T, Alberti O, Retsch R, Shiratori V, Hellwig D, Bertalanffy H. Relationships of virtual reality neuroendoscopic simulations to actual imaging.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2000;  43 176-180
• 17 Kockro RA, Serra L, Tseng-Tsai Y, Chan C, Yih-Yian S, Gim-Guan C, Lee E, Hoe LY, Hern N, Nowinski WL. Planning and simulation of neurosurgery in a virtual reality environment.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  46 118-137

Correspondence