Editorial Comment zu:

Literatur

• 1 Poppel H van. et al .A Prospective Randomized EORTC Intergroup Phase 3 Study Comparing the Complications of Elective Nephron-Sparing Surgery and Radical Nephrectomy for Low-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol November 2006
• 2 Pahernik S. et al . Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma with normal contralateral kidney: 25 years of experience.  J Urol. 2006;  175 2027-2031
• 3 Becker F. et al . Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: Long-term survival data of 216 patients.  Eur Urol. 2006;  49 308-313
• 4 Becker F. et al . Excellent long-term cancer control with elective nephron-sparing surgery for selected renal cell carcinomas measuring more than 4 cm.  Eur Urol. 2006;  49 1058-1063
• 5 Campbell S C, Novick A C. Expanding the indications for elective partial nephrectomy: is this advisable?.  Eur Urol. 2006;  49 952-954
• 6 Siddiqui S A. et al . Impact of tumor size on the predictive ability of the pT3a primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma.  J Urol. 2007;  177 59-62
• 7 Frank I. et al . Independent validation of the 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma using a large, single institution cohort.  J Urol. 2005;  173 1889-1892
• 8 Frank I. et al . pT2 classification for renal cell carcinoma. Can its accuracy be improved?.  J Urol. 2005;  173 380-384
• 9 Siemer S. et al . Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a.  J Urol. 2005;  173 33-37
• 10 Roberts W W. et al . Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography.  J Urol. 2005;  173 713-715
• 11 Bonsib S M. The renal sinus is the principal invasive pathway: a prospective study of 100 renal cell carcinomas.  Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;  28 1594-1600