Validity of a Swimming Snorkel for Metabolic Testing

Abstract

Two models of a swimming snorkel connected to a portable metabolic cart (Cosmed K4 b², Rome, Italy) were assessed using a gas exchange simulation system. Four standardized testing protocols were designed to mimic different swimming conditions and were performed similarly in three conditions so that both snorkels could be compared to measured values obtained by connecting the simulator directly with the gas analyzer. Simulated and measured values were highly correlated (R² = 0.891 to 0.998) and in good agreement, with only a small overestimation of expiratory tidal volume (4 %, p = 0.005), not large enough to significantly affect the accuracy of ventilation or gas exchange parameters. Values measured using both swimming snorkels also highly correlated with simulated values, particularly for the ventilatory and primary gas exchange variables (R² = 0.996 and 0.998 in both models for V·O₂ and V·CO₂, respectively). A moderate overestimation of F_EO₂ was observed in both models (2.65 % and 2.48 % relative, p = 0.03) and attributed to minimal mixing of inspiratory and expiratory gases, although not affecting V·O₂ measurements. We conclude that both snorkels are valid devices for measuring pulmonary breath-by-breath gas exchange parameters in connection with the K4 b² across a wide physiological range.

Key words

swimming - gas analysis - oxygen uptake - respiratory valve - K4 b²

References

• 1 Bland J M, Altman D G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.  Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;  8 135-160
• 2 Demarie S, Sardella F, Billat V, Magini W, Faina M. The V·O₂ slow component in swimming.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;  84 95-99
• 3 Doyon K H, Perrey S, Abe D, Hughson R L. Field testing of V·O_2peak in cross-country skiers with portable breath-by-breath system.  Can J Appl Physiol. 2001;  26 1-11
• 4 Duffield R, Dawson B, Pinnington H C, Wong P. Accuracy and reliability of a Cosmed K4 b² portable gas analysis system.  J Sci Med Sport. 2004;  7 11-22
• 5 Eisenman J C, Brisco N, Shadrick D, Welsh S. Comparative analysis of the Cosmed Quark b² and K4 b² gas analysis systems during submaximal exercise.  J Sports Med Phys Fitn. 2003;  43 150-155
• 6 Gore C J, Catcheside P G, French S N, Bennet J M, Laforgia J. Automated V·O_2max calibrator for open circuit calorimetry systems.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;  29 1095-1103
• 7 Hausswirth C, Bigard A X, Le Chevalier J M. The Cosmed K4 telemetry system as an accurate device for oxygen uptake measurements during exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 1997;  18 449-453
• 8 Hill A V, Lupton H. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen.  Q J Med. 1923;  16 135-171
• 9 Huszczuk A, Whipp B J, Wasserman K. A respiratory gas exchange simulator for routine calibration in metabolic studies.  Eur Resp J. 1990;  3 465-468
• 10 Katch V L, Sady S S, Freedson P. Biological variability in maximal aerobic power.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;  14 21-25
• 11 Keskinen K L, Rodríguez F A, Keskinen O P. Respiratory snorkel and valve system for breath-by-breath gas analysis in swimming.  Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;  13 322-329
• 12 Littlewood R A, White M S, Bell K L, Davies P S, Cleghorn G J, Grote R. Comparison of the Cosmed K4 b² and the Deltatrac II metabolic cart in measuring resting energy expenditure in adults.  Clin Nutr. 2002;  21 491-497
• 13 Maiolo C, Melchiorri G, Iacopino L, Masala S, De Lorenzo A. Physical activity energy expenditure measured using a portable telemetric device in comparison with a mass spectrometer.  Br J Sports Med. 2003;  37 445-447
• 14 Marquis P. Method Validator (ver. 1.19). English version by Jordan P. Freeware software programme. http://perso.easynet.fr/∼philimar/ 16.02.2000
• 15 McLaughlin J E, King G A, Howley E T, Bassett Jr D R, Ainsworth B E. Validation of the COSMED K4 b² portable metabolic system.  Int J Sports Med. 2001;  22 280-284
• 16 Mc Naughton L R, Sherman R, Roberts S, Bentley D J. Portable gas analyser Cosmed K4b2 compared to a laboratory based mass spectrometer system.  J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005;  45 315-323
• 17 Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods.  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983;  21 709-720
• 18 Pinnington H C, Wong P, Tay J, Green D, Dawson B. The level of accuracy and agreement in measures of FEO₂, FECO₂, and VE between the Cosmed K4 b² portable, respiratory gas analysis system and a metabolic cart.  J Sci Med Sport. 2001;  4 324-335
• 19 Prieur F, Busso T, Castells J, Bonnefoy R, Benoit H, Geyssant A, Denis C. A system to simulate gas exchange in humans to control quality of metabolic measurements.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1998;  78 549-554
• 20 Prieur F, Busso T, Castells J, Bonnefoy R, Benoit H, Geyssant A, Denis C. Validity of oxygen uptake measurements during exercise under moderate hyperoxia.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 958-962
• 21 Rodríguez F A, Keskinen K L, Keskinen O P, Malvela M T. Oxygen uptake kinetics during free swimming: a pilot study. Chatard J‐C Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Saint-Étienne; Publications de l'Université de Saint-Étienn 2003: 379-384
• 22 Toussaint H M, Meulemans A, de Groot G, Hollander A P, Schreurs A W, VerVoorn K. Respiratory valve for oxygen uptake measurements during swimming.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1987;  56 363-366
• 23 Withers R T, Gore C J, Gass G, Hahn A. Determination of maximal oxygen consumption (V·O_2max) or maximal aerobic power. Gore CJ Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. Australian Sports Commission. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 2000: 114-127