Impact of Graft Size and Resuspension Level of the Commissures on Aortic Insufficiency after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve

Abstract

Background: In addition to the size of the graft, the resuspension of the commissures has been described as important for valve function in valve-sparing aortic root replacement procedures. This study describes the influence of a stepwise reduction of the fixation level of the commissures within the graft as well as a stepwise reduction of graft size on valve insufficiency. Method: Porcine aortic valves were reimplanted into a tubular graft and the height of the commissures was reduced in a stepwise manner. In a second series of experiments, the diameter of the grafts was reduced by 30 % and 50 %. Results: A reduction of the commissure heights by 10 % and 20 % caused a significant increase in reflux water. Using the criteria of homograft preparation, a 10 %, but not a 20 %, reduction was tolerated. The coaptation level of the valve became increasingly lower, indicating a higher risk for late valve incompetence. A reduction of the prosthesis diameter by 30 % and 50 % did not result in insufficiency of the valve but it lowered the coaptation level. Conclusion: Resuspension of the commissures within the graft has a more important impact on early failure rates than the choice of graft size.

Key words

aortic disease - heart valve surgery - valve‐sparing operation

References

• 1 David A, Feindel C M. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;  103 617-622
• 2 Svensson L G. Sizing for modified Davids reimplantation procedure.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  76 1751-1753
• 3 David T E. Sizing and tailoring the Dacron graft for reimplantation of the aortic valve.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  130 243-244
• 4 Gleason T G. New graft formulation and modification of the David reimplantation technique.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  130 601-603
• 5 Pethig K, Milz A, Hagl C, Harringer W, Haverich A. Aortic valve reimplantation in ascending aortic aneurysm: risk factors for early valve failure.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  73 29-33
• 6 Barratt-Boyes B G. A method for preparing and inserting a homograft aortic valve.  Brit J Surg. 1965;  52 847-856
• 7 Kunzelmann K S, Grande K J, David T E, Cochran R P, Verrier E D. Aortic root and valve relationships: impact on surgical repair.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;  107 162-170
• 8 Morishita K, Abe T, Fukada J, Sato H, Shiiku C. A surgical method for selecting appropriate size of graft in aortic root remodelling.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 1795-1796
• 9 David T E. Aortic valve sparing operations.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  73 1029-1030
• 10 Pepper J, Yacoub M. Valve conserving operation for aortic regurgitation.  J Card Surg. 1997;  12 (Suppl 2) 151-156
• 11 El Khoury G A, Underwood M J, Glineur D, Derouck D, Dion R A. Reconstruction of the ascending aorta and aortic root: experience in 45 consecutive patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 1246-1250
• 12 Hopkins R A. Aortic valve leaflet sparing and salvage surgery: evolution of techniques for aortic root reconstruction.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;  24 886-897
• 13 Erasmi A, Sievers H H, Scharfschwerdt M, Eckel T, Misfeld M. In vitro hydrodynamics, cusp-bending deformation, and root distensibility for different types of aortic valve-sparing operations: remodeling, sinus prosthesis, and reimplantation.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  130 1044-1049
• 14 Graeter T P, Fries R, Aicher D, Reul H, Schmitz C, Schäfers H J. In-vitro comparison of aortic valve hemodynamics between aortic root remodeling and aortic valve reimplantation.  J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;  15 329-335