Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-965814
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Neue Prinzipien und Techniken in der operativen Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms: Aktuelle systematische Übersicht
New Techniques in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Carcinoma: A Systematic ReviewPublication History
eingereicht 14.8.2007
revidiert 16.9.2007
akzeptiert 21.9.2007
Publication Date:
19 November 2007 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Die operative Standardtherapie des Zervixkarzinoms in den FIGO-Stadien IB - IIA ist die abdominale radikale Hysterektomie („Wertheim-Operation“) mit pelviner und eventuell paraaortaler Lymphknotenentfernung. In Deutschland und Österreich wird dieser Eingriff traditionell auch beim Stadium IIB durchgeführt. Patientinnen mit histopathologischen Risikofaktoren - in der Regel etwa 50 % der Fälle - erhalten zusätzlich zur radikalen Operation eine adjuvante (Chemo-)Radiotherapie. Die operative Standardtherapie scheint im Vergleich zur primären Radiotherapie mit einer wesentlich höheren behandlungsbedingten Morbidität assoziiert zu sein, aber keine besseren Heilungsergebnisse zu erbringen. In jüngster Zeit erfolgten deshalb zahlreiche Neuentwicklungen mit dem Ziel, den therapeutischen Index der operativen Behandlung des Zervixkarzinoms zu verbessern. Dabei wurden sowohl neue Operationstechniken angewandt als auch neue Operationsprinzipien berücksichtigt. Das Spektrum neuer Verfahren reicht von minimalinvasiven über fertilitätserhaltende und autonome Nerven schonende bis zu supraradikalen Eingriffen. Ausgehend von einer embryologisch definierten chirurgischen Beckenanatomie wurde die Kompartimentresektion als ein neues Radikalitätsprinzip eingeführt, das die adjuvante Strahlentherapie entbehrlich macht. Obwohl bislang keines der neuen Verfahren in randomisierten prospektiven Studien gegenüber dem noch geltenden Standard geprüft wurde, kann aufgrund der bereits gewonnenen Ergebnisse ein signifikanter Fortschritt in der operativen Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms erwartet werden. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden die Neuerungen anhand einer systematischen Literaturrecherche in den Medline- und Cochrane-Datenbanken vorgestellt und vergleichend evaluiert. Insbesondere wurden die patienten- und tumorbezogenen Rahmenbedingungen ermittelt, die für die jeweiligen neuen Verfahren als Voraussetzungen für eine Verbesserung gegenüber dem Standard angesehen werden müssen. Die Arbeit wird durch die Einbeziehung neuer Entwicklungen der operativen Therapie des Mikrokarzinoms (FIGO-Stadium IA) einerseits und lokoregionär fortgeschrittener und rezidivierender Tumoren andererseits komplettiert.
Abstract
Abdominal radical hysterectomy (the “Wertheim operation“) combined with pelvic and periaortic lymph node dissection is still regarded as the standard surgical therapy for cervical carcinoma, FIGO stages IB - IIA. In Germany and Austria, this procedure is also carried out in selected patients with FIGO stage IIB cancer. Postoperative adjuvant (chemo-)radiation is recommended for all patients with histopathologically high risk factors detected in the surgical specimens - generally about 50 % of cases. This conventional surgical approach is obviously associated with a higher treatment-related morbidity compared to primary radiation as the therapeutic alternative, without achieving better tumor control. In consequence, various new surgical techniques have recently been developed with the aim of improving the therapeutic index of surgery for cervical cancer. The new surgical spectrum includes minimally invasive/robotic techniques, supraradical procedures as well as techniques which preserve fertility and the autonomic nerves. Compartment resection, a new excisional approach based on embryologically defined surgical pelvic anatomy, makes it possible to dispense with adjuvant radiation. Although none of the new procedures has been compared with the current standard in prospective randomized trials significant progress in the surgical therapy of cervical cancer can be expected from the results published to date. This systematic review examines and analyzes the new developments based on literature from the Medline and Cochrane databases with particular reference to the patient and tumor-related conditions which must be met to obtain (potential) benefits compared to the standard therapy. New surgical options for the treatment of microcarcinomas (FIGO stage IA) and locoregionally advanced and recurrent disease are reviewed as well.
Schlüsselwörter
Zervixkarzinom - minimalinvasive Chirurgie - Fertilitätserhalt - Nervenschonung - Kompartimentresektion
Key words
cervical cancer - minimally invasive surgery - preservation of fertility - autonomic nerve preservation - compartment resection
Literatur
- 1 Kamangar F, Dores G M, Anderson W F. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: Defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24 2137-2150
- 2 Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V. und das RKI .Krebs in Deutschland. Häufigkeiten und Trends. 5. Aufl. Saarbrücken; 2006: 56-59
- 3 Koutsky L A, Ault K A, Wheeler C M, Brown D R, Barr E, Alvarez F B, Chiacchierini L M, Jansen K U. A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347 1645-1651
- 4 Waggoner S E. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2003; 361 2217-2225
- 5 Mendling W. Onkologie. Neue nervenschonende Operationsformen beim Zervixkarzinom. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2004; 64 1348-1350
- 6 Höckel M. Die Post-Wertheim-Emanzipation und ‐Evolution der operativen Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2006; 66 729-733
- 7 Kaufmann M, Beckmann M W, Emons G, Dall P, Ebert A D, Hantschmann P, von Minckwitz G, Schmalfeld B. (Hrsg) .Aktuelle Empfehlungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologie Onkologie. München, Wien, New York; Zuckschwerdt 2006
- 8 Mitchell D G, Snyder B, Coakley F, Reinhold C, Thomas G, Amendola M, Schwartz L H, Woodward P, Pannu H, Hricak H. Early invasive cervical cancer: Tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24 5687-5694
- 9 Akata D, Kerimoglu U, Hazirolan T, Karcaaltincaba M, Kose F, Ozmen M N, Akhan O. Efficacy of transvaginal contrast-enhanced MRI in the early staging of cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15 1727-1733
- 10 Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Chi D S, Amendola M A, Brandt K, Schwartz L H, Koelliker S, Siegelman E S, Brown J J, McGhee Jr R B, Iyer R, Vitellas K M, Snyder B, Long 3rd H J. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: Results of the Intergroup Study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651 - Gynecologic Oncology Group 183. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23 9329-9337
- 11 Rockall A G, Ghosh S, Alexander-Sefre F, Babar S, Younis M T, Naz S, Jacobs I J, Reznek R H. Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA?. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 101 244-249
- 12 Huang W C, Yang J M, Yang Y C, Yang S H. Ultrasonographic characteristics and cystoscopic correlates of bladder wall invasion by endophytic cervical cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 27 680-686
- 13 Chou H H, Chang T C, Yen T C, Ng K K, Hsueh S, Ma S Y, Chang C J, Huang H J, Chao A, Wu T I, Jung S M, Wu Y C, Lin C T, Huang K G, Lai C H. Low value of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24 123-128
- 14 Roh J W, Seo S S, Lee S, Kang K W, Kim S K, Sim J S, Kim J Y, Hong E K, Cho D S, Lee J S, Park S Y. Role of positron emission tomography in pretreatment lymph node staging of uterine cervical cancer: A prospective surgicopathologic correlation study. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41 2086-2092
- 15 Wright J D, Dehdashti F, Herzog T J, Mutch D G, Huettner P C, Rader J S, Gibb R K, Powell M A, Gao F, Siegel B A, Grigsby P W. Preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma by [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Cancer. 2005; 104 2484-2491
- 16 Rockall A G, Sohaib S A, Harisinghani M G, Babar S A, Singh N, Jeyarajah A R, Oram D H, Jacobs I J, Shepherd J H, Reznek R H. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23 2813-2821
- 17 Hughes R R, Brewington K C, Hanjani P, Photopulos G, Dick D, Votava C, Moran M, Coleman S. Extended field irradiation for cervical cancer based on surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol. 1980; 9 153-161
- 18 Varia M A, Bundy B N, Deppe G, Mannel R, Averette H E, Rose P G, Connelly P. Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 42 1015-1023
- 19 Querleu D, Leblanc E, Castelain B. Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the staging of early carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 164 579-581
- 20 Stryker J A, Mortel R. Survival following extended field irradiation in carcinoma of cervix metastatic to para-aortic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 79 399-405
- 21 Marnitz S, Kohler C, Roth C, Fuller J, Hinkelbein W, Schneider A. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 99 536-544
- 22 Chu K K, Chang S D, Chen F P, Soong Y K. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer - preliminary experience among Chinese. Gynecol Oncol. 1997; 64 49-53
- 23 Cosin J A, Fowler J M, Chen M D, Paley P J, Carson L F, Twiggs L B. Pretreatment surgical staging of patients with cervical carcinoma: the case for lymph node debulking. Cancer. 1998; 82 2241-2248
- 24 Goff B A, Muntz H G, Paley P J, Tamimi H K, Koh W J, Greer B E. Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1999; 74 436-442
- 25 Odunsi K O, Lele S, Ghamande S, Seago P, Driscoll D L. The impact of pre-therapy extraperitoneal surgical staging on the evaluation and treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2001; 22 325-330
- 26 Hasenburg A, Salama J K, Van T J, Amosson C, Chiu J K, Kieback D G. Evaluation of patients after extraperitoneal lymph node dissection and subsequent radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 84 321-326
- 27 Vergote I, Amant F, Berteloot P, Van Gramberen M. Laparoscopic lower para-aortic staging lymphadenectomy in stage IB2, II, and III cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002; 12 22-26
- 28 Sonoda Y, Leblanc E, Querleu D, Castelain B, Papageorgiou T H, Lambaudie E, Narducci F. Prospective evaluation of surgical staging of advanced cervical cancer via a laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 91 326-331
- 29 Kohler C, Klemm P, Schau A, Possover M, Krause N, Tozzi R, Schneider A. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 95 52-61
- 30 Schneider A, Hertel H. Surgical and radiographic staging in patients with cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 16 11-18
- 31 Querleu D, Delannes M, Leblanc E, Castelain B, Sonoda Y. Staging of advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 62 614
- 32 Denschlag D, Gabriel B, Mueller-Lantzsch C, Tempfer C, Henne K, Gitsch G, Hasenburg A. Evaluation of patients after extraperitoneal lymph node dissection for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 96 658-664
- 33 Malur S, Krause N, Kohler C, Schneider A. Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 80 254-257
- 34 Barranger E, Grahek D, Cortez A, Talbot J N, Uzan S, Darai E. Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node procedure using a combination of patent blue and radioisotope in women with cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2003; 97 3003-3009
- 35 Buist M R, Pijpers R J, van Lingen A, van Diest P J, Dijkstra J, Kenemans P, Verheijen R H. Laparoscopic detection of sentinel lymph nodes followed by lymph node dissection in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 90 290-296
- 36 Lambaudie E, Collinet P, Narducci F, Sonoda Y, Papageorgiou T, Carpentier P, Leblanc E, Querleu D. Laparoscopic identification of sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer: prospective study using a combination of patent blue dye injection and technetium radiocolloid injection. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 89 84-87
- 37 Plante M, Renaud M C, Tetu B, Harel F, Roy M. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 91 494-503
- 38 van Dam P A, Hauspy J, Vanderheyden T, Sonnemans H, Spaepen A, Eggenstein G, Dirix L, Verkinderen L. Intraoperative sentinel node identification with technetium-99 m-labeled nanocolloid in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix: a feasibility study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003; 13 182-186
- 39 Barranger E, Cortez A, Uzan S, Callard P, Darai E. Value of intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 94 175-180
- 40 Barranger E, Cortez A, Commo F, Marpeau O, Uzan S, Darai E, Callard P. Histopathological validation of the sentinel node concept in cervical cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004; 15 870-874
- 41 Marchiole P, Buenerd A, Scoazec J Y, Dargent D, Mathevet P. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not accurate in predicting lymph node status for patients with cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2004; 100 2154-2159
- 42 Martinez-Palones J M, Gil-Moreno A, Perez-Benavente M A, Roca I, Xercavins J. Intraoperative sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer using a combination of radiolabeled albumin injection and isosulfan blue dye injection. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 92 845-850
- 43 Hauspy J, Beiner M, Harley I, Ehrlich L, Rasty G, Covens A. Sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 105 285-290
- 44 Bats A S, Clement D, Larousserie F, Lefrere-Belda M A, Faraggi M, Froissart M, Lecuru F. Sentinel lymph node biopsy improves staging in early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 105 189-193
- 45 Schwendinger V, Muller-Holzner E, Zeimet A G, Marth C. Sentinel node detection with blue dye technique in early cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006; 27 359-362
- 46 Popa I, Plante M, Renaud M C, Roy M, Tetu B. Negative sentinel lymph node accurately predicts negative status of pelvic lymph nodes in uterine cervix carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103 649-653
- 47 Wydra D, Sawicki S, Wojtylak S, Bandurski T, Emerich J. Sentinel node identification in cervical cancer patients undergoing transperitoneal radical hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006; 16 649-654
- 48 Wang H Y, Sun J M, Lu H F, Shi D R, Ou Z L, Ren Y L, Fu S Q. Micrometastases detected by cytokeratin 19 expression in sentinel lymph nodes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006; 16 643-648
- 49 Marnitz S, Kohler C, Bongardt S, Braig U, Hertel H, Schneider A. Topographic distribution of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103 35-44
- 50 Rob L, Strnad P, Robova H, Charvat M, Pluta M, Schlegerova D, Hrehorcak M. Study of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 98 281-288
- 51 Barranger E, Coutant C, Cortez A, Uzan S, Darai E. Sentinel node biopsy is reliable in early-stage cervical cancer but not in locally advanced disease. Ann Oncol. 2005; 16 1237-1242
- 52 Silva L B, Silva-Filho A L, Traiman P, Triginelli S A, de Lima C F, Siqueira C F, Barroso A, Rossi T M, Pedrosa M S, Miranda D, Melo J R. Sentinel node detection in cervical cancer with (99 m) Tc.phytate. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 97 588-595
- 53 Lin Y S, Tzeng C C, Huang K F, Kang C Y, Chia C C, Hsieh J F. Sentinel node detection with radiocolloid lymphatic mapping in early invasive cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15 273-277
- 54 Angioli R, Palaia I, Cipriani C, Muzii L, Calcagno M, Gullotta G, Panici P B. Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in cervical cancer: a critical point of view. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 96 504-509
- 55 Lai C H, Huang K G, Hong J H, Lee C L, Chou H H, Chang T C, Hsueh S, Huang H J, Ng K K, Tsai C S. Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 89 160-167
- 56 Clement P, Young R. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgical Pathology. Philadelphia; W. B. Brothers 2000: 99
- 57 Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases). Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. 1912; 66 169-232
- 58 Okabayashi H. Radical abdominal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix uteri. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921; 33 335-341
- 59 Meigs V. Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissections: A report of 100 patients operated on five or more years ago. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1951; 62 854-870
- 60 Piver M S, Rutledge F, Smith J P. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974; 44 265-272
- 61 Symmonds R E. Some surgical aspects of gynecologic cancer. Cancer. 1975; 36 649-660
- 62 Massi G, Savino L, Susini T. Three classes of radical hysterectomy. Amer J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175 1576-1585
- 63 Hrgovic Z, Erman Vlahovic M, Habek D, Milojkovic M, Vukovic Bobic M, Hrgovic I, Maass N, Bukovic D, Mundhenke C. Komplikationen nach Wertheim-Operation. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2006; 66 971-975
- 64 Sedlis A, Bundy B N, Rotman M Z, Lentz S S, Muderspach L I, Zaino R J. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999; 73 177-183
- 65 Peters 3rd W A. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18 1606-1613
- 66 Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, Favini G, Ferri L, Mangioni C. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-II a cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997; 350 535-540
- 67 Low J A, Mauger G M, Carmichael J A. The effect of Wertheim hysterectomy upon bladder and urethral function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 139 826-834
- 68 Sekido N, Kawai K, Akaza H. Lower urinary tract dysfunction as persistent complication of radical hysterectomy. Int J Urol. 1997; 4 259-264
- 69 Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman P W, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340 1383-1389
- 70 Barnes W, Waggoner S, Delgado G, Maher K, Potkul R, Barter J, Benjamin S. Manometric characterization of rectal dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1991; 42 116-119
- 71 Dargent D. A new future for Schauta's operation through presurgical retroperitoneal pelviscopy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1987; 8 292-296
- 72 Sardi J, Vidaurreta J, Bermudez A, di Paola G. Laparoscopically assisted Schauta operation: learning experience at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Buenos Aires University Hospital. Gynecol Oncol. 1999; 75 361-365
- 73 Hertel H, Kohler C, Michels W, Possover M, Tozzi R, Schneider A. Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 90 505-511
- 74 Malur S, Possover M, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15 289-292
- 75 Nam J H, Kim J H, Kim D Y, Kim M K, Yoo H J, Kim Y M, Kim Y T, Mok J E. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 92 277-283
- 76 Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, De Petrillo D, Covens A. A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 93 588-593
- 77 Jackson K S, Das N, Naik R, Lopes A D, Godfrey K A, Hatem M H, Monaghan J M. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 95 655-661
- 78 Sharma R, Bailey J, Anderson R, Murdoch J. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): a comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006; 16 1927-1932
- 79 Morgan D J, Hunter D C, McCracken G, McClelland H R, Price J H, Dobbs S P. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up. BJOG. 2007; 114 537-542
- 80 Querleu D, Narducci F, Poulard V, Lacaze S, Occelli B, Leblanc E, Cosson M. Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study. Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 85 154-158
- 81 Canis M, Mage G, Wattiez A, Pouly J L, Manhes H, Bruhat M A. Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri?. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1990; 19 921
- 82 Nezhat C R, Burrell M O, Nezhat F R, Benigno B B, Welander C E. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166 864-865
- 83 Spirtos N M, Eisenkop S M, Schlaerth J B, Ballon S C. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187 340-348
- 84 Ramirez P T, Slomovitz B M, Soliman P T, Coleman R L, Levenback C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 102 252-255
- 85 Li G, Yan X, Shang H, Wang G, Chen L, Han Y. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib - IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 105 176-180
- 86 Lanfranco A R, Castellanos A E, Desai J P, Meyers W C. Robotic surgery. A current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004; 239 14-21
- 87 Sert B M, Abeler V M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with dissection - case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006; 27 531-533
- 88 Dargent D, Brun J, Roy M. La trachelectomie elargie (T.E.). Une alternative à l'hysterectomie radicale dans le traitement des cancers infiltrants developpés sur la face du col uterin. J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 2 292-295
- 89 Roy M, Plante M. Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179 1491-1496
- 90 Shepherd J H, Crawford R A, Oram D H. Radical trachelectomy: a way to preserve fertility in the treatment of early cervical cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105 912-916
- 91 Covens A, Shaw P, Murphy J, DePetrillo D, Lickrish G, Laframboise S, Rosen B. Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IA‐B carcinoma of the cervix?. Cancer. 1999; 86 2273-2279
- 92 Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, Mathevet P. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2000; 88 1877-1882
- 93 Shepherd J H, Mould T, Oram D H. Radical trachelectomy in early stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and fertility rates. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 108 882-885
- 94 Hertel H, Possover M, Krause N, Kühne-Heid R, Schneider A. Fertility after radical trachelectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2001; 61 117-120
- 95 Burnett A F, Roman L D, O'Meara A T, Morrow C P. Radical vaginal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 88 419-423
- 96 Schlaerth J B, Spirtos N M, Schlaerth A C. Radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188 29-34
- 97 Bernardini M, Barrett J, Seaward G, Covens A. Pregnancy outcomes in patients after radical trachelectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189 1378-1382
- 98 Covens A. Preserving fertility in early stage cervical cancer with radical trachelectomy. Contemp Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 108 882-885
- 99 Steed H, Covens A. Radical vaginal trachelectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for preservation of fertility. Postgrad Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 23 1-6
- 100 Mathevet P, de Kaszon L E, Dargent D. La preservation de la fertilité dans les cancers du col uterin de stade precoce. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003; 31 706-712
- 101 Plante M, Renaud M C, Francois H, Roy M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 94 614-623
- 102 Plante M, Renaud M C, Hoskins I A, Roy M. Vaginal trachelectomy: A valuable fertility-preserving option in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. A series of 50 pregnancies and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 98 3-10
- 103 Hertel H, Kohler C, Grund D, Hillemanns P, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy: Prospective multicenter study of 100 patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103 506-511
- 104 Shepherd J H, Spencer C, Herod J, Ind T E. Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer - cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women. BJOG. 2006; 113 719-724
- 105 Smith J R, Boyle D C, Corless D J, Ungar L, Lawson A D, Del Priore G, McCall J M, Lindsay I, Bridges J E. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a new surgical technique for the conservative management of cervical carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104 1196-1200
- 106 Rodriguez M, Guimares O, Rose P G. Radical abdominal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine conservation and subsequent pregnancy in the treatment of early invasive cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185 370-374
- 107 Del Priore G, Ungar L, Boyle D, Smith R J. Abdominal radical trachelectomy for fertility preservation in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101 3S‐4S
- 108 Ungar L, Palfalvi L, Hogg R, Siklos P, Boyle D C, Del Priore G, Smith J R. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a fertility-preserving option for women with early cervical cancer. BJOG. 2005; 112 366-369
- 109 Abu-Rustum N R, Sonoda Y, Black D, Levine D A, Chi D S, Barakat R R. Fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical carcinoma: technique and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103 807-813
- 110 Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell M A, Samara M. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352 9-19
- 111 Kobayashi Y, Akiyama F, Hasumi K. A case of successful pregnancy after treatment of invasive cervical cancer with systemic chemotherapy and conization. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 100 213-215
- 112 Rob L, Charvat M, Robova H, Pluta M, Strnad P, Hrehorcak M, Skapa P. Less radical fertility-sparing surgery than radical trachelectomy in early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007; 17 304-310
- 113 Höckel M, Konerding M A, Heussel C P. Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178 971-976
- 114 Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 79 154-157
- 115 Trimbos J B, Maas C P, Deruiter M C, Peters A A, Kenter G G. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001; 11 180-186
- 116 Kato T, Murakami G, Yabuki Y. A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003; 33 589-591
- 117 Ercoli A, Delmas V, Gadonneix P, Fanfani F, Villet R, Paparella P, Mancuso S, Scambia G. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003; 25 200-206
- 118 Maas C P, Trimbos J B, DeRuiter M C, van de Velde C J, Kenter G G. Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspective. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003; 48 271-279
- 119 Possover M. Technical modification of the nerve-sparing laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy type 3 for better reproducibility of this procedure. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 90 245-247
- 120 Ito E, Saito T. Nerve-preserving techniques for radical hysterectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004; 30 1137-1140
- 121 Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, Solima E, Hanozet F, Zanaboni F, Kusamura S. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 93 307-314
- 122 Possover M, Quakernack J, Chiantera V. The LANN technique to reduce postoperative functional morbidity in laparoscopic radical pelvic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201 913-917
- 123 Katahira A, Niikura H, Kaiho Y, Nakagawa H, Kurokawa K, Arai Y, Yaegashi N. Intraoperative electrical stimulation of the pelvic splanchnic nerves during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 98 462-466
- 124 Sakuragi N, Todo Y, Kudo M, Yamamoto R, Sato T. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15 389-397
- 125 Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, Zanaboni F, Solima E, Spatti G, Hanozet F, Vecchione F, Rossi G, Kusamura S. Type II versus type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 102 256-262
- 126 Todo Y, Kuwabara M, Watari H, Ebina Y, Takeda M, Kudo M, Yamamoto R, Sakuragi N. Urodynamic study on postsurgical bladder function in cervical cancer treated with systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006; 16 369-375
- 127 Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Suprasert P, Tantipalakorn C, Kietpeerakool C. Nerve-sparing class III radical hysterectomy: a modified technique to spare the pelvic autonomic nerves without compromising radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006; 16 1705-1712
- 128 Trimbos J B. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. International symposium on radical hysterectomy dedicated to Hidekazu Okabayashi. The 16th Annual Review Course on Gynecologic Oncology and Pathology. Kyoto, Japan; 2007
- 129 Landoni F, Bocciolone L, Perego P, Maneo A, Bratina G, Mangioni C. Cancer of the cervix, FIGO stages IB and IIA: patterns of local growth and paracervical extension. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995; 5 329-334
- 130 Höckel M, Dornhöfer N. The Hydra phenomenon of cancer: Why tumors recur locally after microscopically complete surgical resection. Cancer Res. 2005; 65 2997-3002
- 131 Höckel M, Horn L C, Fritsch H. Local tumour spread in stage IB‐IIB cervical carcinoma is confined to the mesenchymal compartment of uterovaginal organogenesis. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6 751-756
- 132 Höckel M, Horn L C, Hentschel B, Höckel S, Naumann G. Total mesometrial resection: High resolution nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy based on developmentally defined surgical anatomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003; 13 791-803
- 133 Chassagne D, Sismondi P, Horiot J C, Sinistrero G, Bey P, Zola P, Pernot M, Gerbaulet A, Kunkler I, Michel G. A glossary for reporting complications of treatment in gynecological cancers. Radiother Oncol. 1993; 26 195-202
- 134 Quinn M A, Benedet J L, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman W T, Heintz A P, Ngan H Y, Pecorelli S. FIGO Annual Report, Vol. 26. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 95 S43-S103
- 135 Green J A, Kirwan J M, Tierney J F, Symonds P, Fresco L, Collingwood M, Williams C J. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2001; 358 781-786
- 136 Rocconi R P, Estes J M, Leath 3rd C A. Management strategies for stage IB2 cervical cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 97 387-394
- 137 Höckel M. Pelvic recurrences of cervical cancer. Relapse pattern, prognostic factors, and the role of extended radical treatment. J Pelv Surg. 1999; 5 255-266
- 138 Friedlander M, Grogan M. Guidelines for the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer. Oncologist. 2002; 7 342-347
- 139 Brunschwig A. Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma. Cancer. 1948; 1 177-183
- 140 Mibayashi R. Results in the treatment of cervical cancer at the Kyoto University obstetrical and gynecological clinic. Jpn Obstet Gynecol Soc. 1962; 14 471-472
- 141 Palfalvi L, Ungar L. Laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP), the technique for radical pelvic side wall dissection: Feasibility, technique and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003; 13 914-917
- 142 Ungar L, Palfalvi L. Surgical treatment of lymph node metastases in stage IB cervical cancer: The laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP) procedure. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003; 13 647-651
- 143 Vasilev S A. A modified incision and technique for total retroperitoneal access and lymph node dissection. Gynecol Oncol. 1995; 56 226-230
- 144 Possover M, Krause N, Drahonovsky J, Schneider A. Left-sided suprarenal retrocrural para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced cervical cancer by laparoscopy. Gynecol Oncol. 1998; 71 219-222
- 145 Sardi J, Sananes C, Giaroli A, Bermúdez A, Ferreira M, Soderini A, Snaidas L, Guardado N, Anchezar P, Ortiz O C, Di Paola G R. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma stage IIB: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1998; 8 441-450
- 146 Benedetti-Panici P, Greggi S, Colombo A, Amoroso M, Smaniotto D, Giannarelli D, Amunni G, Raspagliesi F, Zola P, Mangioni C, Landoni F. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20 179-188
- 147 Yamakawa Y, Fujimura M, Hidaka T, Hori S, Saito S. Neoadjuvant intraarterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 77 264-270
- 148 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (NACCCMA Collaboration) . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review. 2004; Issue 1 CD001774 DOI: 10.1002/14651858CD001774.pub2
- 149 Cai H B, Chen H Z, Yin H H. Randomized study of preoperative chemotherapy versus primary surgery for stage IB cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006; 32 315-323
- 150 Buda A, Fossati R, Colombo N, Fei F, Floriani I, Gueli Alletti D, Katsaros D, Landoni F, Lissoni A, Malzoni C, Sartori E, Scollo P, Torri V, Zola P, Mangioni C. Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: The SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian collaborative study. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23 4137-4145
- 151 Choi C H, Kim T J, Lee J W, Kim B G, Lee J H, Bae D S. Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin-c, vincristine and cisplatin (MVC) in patients with stages IB2-IIB cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 104 64-69
- 152 Tanak T, Kokawa K, Umesaki N. Preoperative chemotherapy with irinotecan and mitomycin for FIGO stage III b cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2005; 26 605-607
- 153 Nagao S, Fujiwara K, Oda T, Ishikawa H, Koike H, Tanaka H, Kohno I. Combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and carboplatin in advanced or recurrent cervix cancer. A pilot study. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 96 805-809
- 154 Mancuso S, Smaniotto D, Benedetti Panici P, Favale B, Greggi S, Manfredi R, Margariti P A, Morganti A G, Scambia G, Tortoreto F, Valentini V, Cellini N. Phase I - II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 78 324-328
- 155 Martinez-Monge R, Jurado M, Aristu J J, Moreno M, Cambeiro M, Perez-Ochoa A, Lopez-Garcia G, Alcazar J L. Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy during radical surgery for locally advanced and recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 82 538-543
- 156 Distaefano M, Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Fanfani F, Smaniotto D, D'Agostino G, Morganti A, Scambia G. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Long-term outcome and complications. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 99 S166-S170
- 157 Classe J M, Rauch P, Rodier J F, Morice P, Stoeckle E, Lasry S, Houvenaeghel G. Surgery after chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: Morbidity and outcome: Results of a multicenter study of the GCCLCC (Groupe des Chirurgiens de Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer). Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 102 523-529
- 158 Modarress M, Maghami F Q, Golnavaz M, Behtash N, Mousavi A, Khalili G R. Comparative study of chemoradiation and neoadjuvant chemotherapy effects before radical hysterectomy in stage IB‐IIB bulky cervical cancer and with tumor diameter greater than 4 cm. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15 483-488
- 159 Del Carmen M G, McIntyre J F, Fuller A F, Nikrui N, Goodman A. Intraoperative radiation therapy in the treatment of pelvic gynecologic malignancies: a review of fifteen cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 79 457-462
- 160 Höckel M, Schlenger K, Hamm H, Knapstein P G, Hohenfellner R, Rösler H P. Five-year experience with combined operative and radiotherapeutic treatment of recurrent gynecologic tumors infiltrating the pelvic wall. Cancer. 1996; 77 1918-1933
- 161 Höckel M, Dornhöfer N. Pelvic exenteration for gynaecologic tumours: achievements and unanswered questions. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7 837-847
- 162 Höckel M. Ultra-radical compartmentalized surgery in gynaecological oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006; 32 859-865
- 163 Heald R J, Husband E M, Ryall R DH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence?. Br J Surg. 1982; 62 613-616
- 164 Höckel M. Laterally extended endopelvic resection: surgical treatment of infrailiac pelvic wall recurrences of gynecologic malignancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180 306-312
- 165 Höckel M. Laterally extended endopelvic resection. Novel surgical treatment of locally recurrent cervical carcinoma involving the pelvic side wall. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 91 369-377
Prof. Dr. Dr. Michael Höckel
Frauen- und Kinderzentrum
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Liebigstraße 20 a
04103 Leipzig
Email: michael.hoeckel@uniklinik-leipzig.de