RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966434
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy
Publikationsverlauf
submitted 12 July 2006
accepted after revision 28 December 2006
Publikationsdatum:
05. Juli 2007 (online)

Background and study aims: The conventional procedure of ingestion of an entire dose of polyethylene glycol solution on the day before early-morning colonoscopy may result in poor bowel preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and effect of a split-dose ingestion of polyethylene glycol for early-morning colonoscopy. Methods: A total of 303 age- and sex-matched consecutive individuals presenting for medical check-ups were randomly assigned to receive either 4 L of polyethylene glycol solution with a soft diet on the day before colonoscopy (n = 152; group A), or 3 L of polyethylene glycol solution with a soft diet on the preceding day and then 1 L of the solution on the day of colonoscopy (n = 151; group B). The quality of bowel preparation was evaluated using the Ottawa scale, and the time to cecal intubation and the technical difficulty during the procedure were also recorded. Results: There was no difference in compliance between group A (single-dose) and group B (split-dose). The quality of bowel preparation was better in group B compared with group A. When the participants were categorized according to compliance (good compliance, 116 in group A, 119 in group B; poor compliance, 36 in group A, 32 in group B), the quality of the bowel preparation had a higher score in the good compliance compared with the poor compliance group, and in group B this difference was usually significant. Conclusions: Split-dose bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol solution provided a better quality preparation than the conventional method for patients undergoing early-morning colonoscopy.
References
- 1 Vanner S J, MacDonald P H, Paterson W G. et al . A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990; 85 422-427
- 2 Marshall J B, Pineda J J, Barthel J S, King P D. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993; 39 631-634
- 3 Lieberman D A, Ghormley J, Flora K. Effect of oral sodium phosphate colon preparation on serum electrolytes in patients with normal serum creatinine. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 43 467-469
- 4 Zwas R F, Cirillo N W, El-Serang H B, Eisen R N. Colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with oral sodium phosphate solution. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 43 463-466
- 5 Hixson L J. Colorectal ulcers associated with sodium phosphate catharsis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 42 101-102
- 6 Davis G R, Santa Ana C A, Morawski S G, Fordtran J S. Development of a lavage solution assdociated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology. 1980; 78 991-995
- 7 Beck D E, Hartford F J, DiPalma J A, Brady C E. Bowel cleansing with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution. South Med J. 1985; 78 1414-1416
- 8 Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59 482-486
- 9 Church J M. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - timing is the key!. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41 1223-1225
- 10 Thomson A, Naidoo P, Crotty B. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized prospective trail comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol in a predominantly elderly population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996; 11 103-107
- 11 Clarkston W K, Tsen T N, Dies D F. et al . Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective comparison. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 43 42-48
- 12 Pontone P, Bogliolo G, Pietropaolo V, Pallotto P. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate: comparison of 2 preparations for colonoscopy. G Chir. 1996; 17 128-131
- 13 Marshall J B, Barthel J S, King P D. Short report: prospective, randomized trial comparing a single dose sodium phosphate regimen with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993; 7 679-682
- 14 Toledo T K, DiPalma J A. Review article: colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 15 605-611
- 15 Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Azar C. et al . A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62 213-218
- 16 Adams W J, Meagher A P, Lubowski D Z, King D W. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994; 37 229-233
- 17 Sharma V K, Chockalingham S K, Ugheoke E A. et al . Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47 167-171
C. I. Sohn, MD
Department of Internal Medicine
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
108, Pyeong-dong, Jongno-gu
Seoul
Korea, 110-746
Fax: +82-2-20012610
eMail: chongil.sohn@samsung.com