Background and study aims: Assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal neoplasia is important in deciding between endoscopic and surgical resection treatment methods. Prior to attempting endoscopic resection, the lesion is lifted by submucosal injection, and a positive “non-lifting sign” is usually considered to indicate deeper submucosal infiltration. The purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to assess the predictive value of the non-lifting sign for differentiating between adenoma and early cancer (up to discrete submucosal infiltration [sm1]) and cancer with deeper infiltration (sm2).
Patients and methods: During an 11-month period, a total of 271 colorectal neoplastic lesions in 239 patients were included in the study. Apart from the location, size, and macroscopic type of the lesion, the presence or absence of the non-lifting sign was recorded and compared with the endoscopic assessment of invasion depth.
Results: The non-lifting sign had a sensitivity of 61.5 %, a specificity of 98.4 %, a positive predictive value of 80.0 %, a negative predictive value of 96.0 %, and an accuracy of 94.8 %. Endoscopic diagnosis of deeper infiltration had a sensitivity of 84.6 %, a specificity of 98.8 %, a positive predictive value of 88.0 %, a negative predictive value of 98.4 %, and an accuracy of 97.4 %. Statistically significant differences were found in terms of sensitivity and accuracy.
Conclusion: Because of its lower sensitivity and accuracy, the non-lifting sign will not replace endoscopic assessment. If a lesion does not lift, this can make resection technically difficult, but does not reliably predict deeper cancerous invasion.
References
1
Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S. et al .
Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study.
J Gastroenterol.
2004;
39
534-543
2
Participants in the Paris Workshop .
The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach and colon. November 30 to December 1, 2002.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
S3-S43
3
Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T. et al .
Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
44
8-14
4
Kudo S, Rubio C A, Teixeira C R. et al .
Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view.
Endoscopy.
2001;
33
367-373
5
Fujii T, Hasegawa R T, Saitoh Y. et al .
Chromoscopy during colonoscopy.
Endoscopy.
2001;
33
1036-1041
6
Kato S, Fujii T, Koba I. et al .
Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye-spraying: can significant lesions be distinguished?.
Endoscopy.
2001;
33
306-310
7
Matsuda T, Fujii T, Ono A. et al .
Effectiveness of magnifying colonoscopy in diagnosing the depth of invasion of colorectal neoplastic lesions: invasive pattern is an indication for surgical treatment.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
575
AB176
8
Hurlstone D P, Brown S, Cross S S. et al .
High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy or high frequency 20 MHz mini probe endoscopic ultrasound staging for early colorectal neoplasia: a comparative prospective analysis.
Gut.
2005;
54
1585-1589
9
Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Adam I. et al .
Endoscopic morphological anticipation of submucosal invasion in flat and depressed colorectal lesions: clinical implications and subtype analysis of the kudo type V pit pattern using high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy.
Colorectal Dis.
2004;
6
369-375
10
Matsumoto T, Hizawa K, Esaki M. et al .
Comparison of EUS and magnifying colonoscopy for assessment of small colorectal cancers.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
354-360
11
Hizawa K, Suekane H, Aoyagi K. et al .
Use of endosonographic evaluation of colorectal tumor depth in determining the appropriateness of endoscopic mucosal resection.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
768-771
12
Cho E, Nakajima M, Yasuda K. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer invasion.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1993;
39
521-527
13
Tio T L, Weijers O, Hulsman F. et al .
Endosonography of colorectal diseases.
Endoscopy.
1992;
24
309-314
14
Togashi K, Konishi F, Ishizuka T. et al .
Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of large bowel.
Dis Colon Rectum.
1999;
42
1602-1608
15
Kobayashi N, Matsuda T, Saito Y. et al .
Is pit pattern diagnosis possible even for beginners?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
59
AB123
16
Karita M, Tada M, Okita K. et al .
Endoscopic therapy for early colon cancer: the strip biopsy resection technique.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1991;
37
128-132
17
Kudo S, Tamegai Y, Yamano H. et al .
Endoscopic mucosal resection of the colon: the Japanese technique.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
2001;
11
519-535
18
Soetikno R M, Gotoda T, Nakanishi Y. et al .
Endoscopic mucosal resection.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
57
567-579
19
Uno Y, Munakata A.
The non-lifting sign of invasive colon cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
485-489
20
Kato H, Haga S, Endo S. et al .
Lifting of lesions during endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early colorectal cancer: implications for the assessment of resectability.
Endoscopy.
2001;
33
568-573
21
Ishiguro A, Uno Y, Ishiguro Y. et al .
Correlation of lifting versus non-lifting and microscopic depth of invasion in early colorectal cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
50
329-333
22
Saitoh Y, Obata T, Watari J. et al .
Invasion depth diagnosis of depressed type early colorectal cancers by combined use of videoendoscopy and chromoendoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1998;
48
362-370
23
Saitoh Y, Watari J, Fujitani M. et al .
Diagnostic accuracy of the submucosal invasion depth for colorectal submucosal cancers, diagnosis of submucosal invasion depth 1,000 μm by conventional colonoscopy [in Japanese, English abstract].
Stomach Intestine.
2004;
39
1350-1356
24
Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T. et al .
Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum.
Gut.
2006;
55
1592-1597
25
Uraoka T, Fujii T, Saito Y. et al .
Effectiveness of glycerol as a submucosal injection for EMR.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
736-740
26 Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum .General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus: histopathological classification. 6th edn. Tokyo; Kanehara Syuppan 1998: 60-90
N. Kobayashi, MD
Department of Diagnostic ImagingTochigi Cancer Center
Yonan 4-9-13
Utsunomiya
Tochigi 320-0834
Japan
Fax: +81-28-658-5488
Email: nkobayas@tcc.pref.tochigi.jp