Auditory Training: Rules and Applications

Abstract

Auditory training is evidenced by a change in a listener's ability to perform an auditory perceptual task. The result of training - auditory learning - can occur very rapidly from a wide range of training scenarios. Scientific auditory training has the potential to revolutionize professional practice by providing highly efficient and quantitatively verifiable tools for the management of a range of listening/language impairments including auditory processing disorder, specific language and reading impairment, and sensorineural and conductive hearing loss. Our research has focused on discovering the rules of auditory learning and implementing those rules into useful applications. Surprising results have emerged on both fronts. Although training tasks may be too easy to produce optimal learning, the opposite is not true; we have shown robust learning on an impossibly difficult task, thereby emphasizing the importance of active engagement with the task. However, listening to sounds need not be a necessary component of the training - playing a visual spatial task (the computer game Tetris) led to improved performance on an auditory task. For language learning, several studies have found that auditory training using simple sounds can produce wide-ranging improvements in receptive language skills and literacy. Auditory learning includes enhancement of both top-down cognitive processing and bottom-up sensory processing. The most important outstanding issue is further understanding of the transfer of training - the relation between what is trained and what is learned.

Perceptual learning - transfer - generalization - language impairment - hearing in children

REFERENCES

• 1 White S, Milne E, Rosen S et al.. The role of sensorimotor impairments in dyslexia: a multiple case study of dyslexic children.  Dev Sci. 2006;  9 237-255
• 2 Bailey P J, Snowling M J. Auditory processing and the development of language and literacy.  Br Med Bull. 2002;  63 135-146
• 3 Amitay S, Hawkey D JC, Moore D R. Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability.  Percept Psychophys. 2005;  67 691-698
• 4 Moore D R, Amitay S, Vavasour E, Irwin A. Optimizing auditory learning for variable training stimuli. Presented at: Mid-Winter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2006 Baltimore, MD;
• 5 Amitay S, Irwin A, Hawkey D JC, Cowan J A, Moore D R. A comparison of adaptive procedures for rapid and reliable threshold assessment and training in naive listeners.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;  119 1616-1625
• 6 Werner L A. Interpreting developmental psychoacoustics. In: Werner LA, Rubel EW Developmental Psychoacoustics. Washington, DC; American Psychological Association 1992: 2.47-2.88
• 7 Amitay S, Irwin A, Moore D R. Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli.  Nat Neurosci. 2006;  9 1446-1448
• 8 Amitay S, Hawkey D JC, Moore D R. Rapid early learning is dominated by a perceptual component. Presented at: the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society 2005 New York, NY;
• 9 Tallal P. Improving language and literacy is a matter of time.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;  5 721-728
• 10 Moore D R, Rosenberg J F, Coleman J S. Discrimination training of phonemic contrasts enhances phonological processing in mainstream school children.  Brain Lang. 2005;  94 72-85
• 11 Fu Q J, Galvin J, Wang X, Nogaki G. Moderate auditory training can improve speech performance of adult cochlear implant patients.  Acoustic Research Letters Online. 2005;  6 106-111
• 12 Stacey P C, Summerfield A Q. Auditory-perceptual training using a simulation of a cochlear-implant system: a controlled study. Paper presented at: ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception June 15-17, 2005 London, UK;
• 13 Merzenich M M. Building better brains - from lab to laptop.  Aging Today.. 2006;  27 7-8
• 14 Mahuk H W, Connor B B, Appelman J et al.. Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, countrolled study.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;  103 12523-12528
• 15 Tallal P, Miller S L, Bedi G et al.. Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech.  Science. 1996;  271 81-84
• 16 Frederickson N, Frith U, Reason R. Phonological Assessment Battery: Standardised edition.  http://Available at: www.nfer-nelson.co.uk Accessed June 12, 1997; 
• 17 Oxenham A J, Bacon S P. Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing.  Ear Hear. 2003;  24(5) 352-366
• 18 Hall J W, Grose J H, Dev M B, Ghiassi S. The effect of masker interaural time delay on the masking level difference in children with history of normal hearing or history of otitis media with effusion.  Ear Hear. 1998;  19 429-433
• 19 Hall J W, Grose J H, Buss E, Dev M B, Drake A F, Pillsbury H C. The effect of otitis media with effusion on perceptual masking.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  129 1056-1062
• 20 Hogan S C, Moore D R. Impaired binaural hearing in children produced by a threshold level of middle ear disease.  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003;  4 123-129
• 21 Moore D R. Auditory processing disorder (APD): Definition, diagnosis, neural basis, and intervention.  Audiolog Med. 2006;  4 4-11
• 22 Wright B A, Fitzgerald M B. Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;  98 12307-12312
• 23 Hawkey D JC, Amitay S, Moore D R. Early and rapid perceptual learning.  Nat Neurosci. 2004;  7 1055-1056
• 24 Green C S, Bavelier D. Action video game modifies visual selective attention.  Nature. 2003;  423 534-537
• 25 Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V, Schuierer G, Bogdahn U, May A. Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training.  Nature. 2004;  427 311-312