Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973615
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Nichtinvasive Koronarangiographie: aktueller Stand und Perspektiven
Non-invasive coronary angiography: current status and perspectivesPublication History
eingereicht: 11.1.2007
akzeptiert: 14.3.2007
Publication Date:
29 March 2007 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Die Darstellung der Koronararterien mit nichtinvasiven Verfahren (so genannte „nichtinvasive Koronarangiographie”) ist wegen der kleinen Abmessungen und der schnellen Bewegung der Koronargefäße technisch schwierig. Mit der Echokardiographie gelingt die Visualisierung der Koronararterien nur abschnittsweise. Mittels Kernspintomographie lassen sich die Herzkranzgefäße zwar darstellen, Ortsauflösung und Bildqualität gestatten aber die zuverlässige Detektion von Koronarstenosen derzeit nicht. Lediglich zur Diagnostik von Koronaranomalien spielt die Kernspintomographie eine gewisse Rolle. Die Mehrzeilen-Computertomographie hingegen erlaubt bei Anwendung neuester Gerätetechnik, ausreichender Erfahrung und einer gewissen Selektion und Vorbereitung der Patienten eine recht zuverlässige Darstellung der Koronararterien. Stenosen lassen sich mit hoher Sensitivität und Spezifität und insbesondere mit einem hohen negativ-prädiktiven Wert detektieren. Daher beginnt sich die CT-Koronarangiographie als klinisches Verfahren bei derzeit noch streng selektierten Patienten zu etablieren. Anwendungen sind am sinnvollsten im Bereich der „Ausschlussdiagnostik” bei niedriger bis intermediärer prä-Test Wahrscheinlichkeit, um eine ansonsten notwendige invasive Koronarangiographie zu vermeiden.
Summary
Non-invasive visualization of the coronary arteries is technically challenging because of the small dimensions and rapid motion of the coronary vessels. Echocardiography only allows assessment of very short coronary segments. Magnetic resonance imaging has been proposed for coronary imaging, but limitations especially of spatial resolution prevent routine clinical applications, with the possible exception of its use in patients with suspected coronary anomalies. Recent generations of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners, on the other hand, allow increasingly accurate visualization of the coronary arteries. With the prerequesite of appropriate patient selection and preparation, high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of coronary artery stenoses can be achieved. Numerous studies have demonstrated highly negative predictive values to rule out coronary stenoses, which makes CT coronary angiography potentially useful specially in the setting of low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease. A CT coronary angiogram that clearly demonstrates absence of stenoses may in this situation help avoid „negative” invasive coronary angiograms.
Schlüsselwörter
Koronarangiographie - Koronararterien - koronare Herzkrankheit - Computertomographie - Kernspintomographie - Bildgebung
Key words
coronary angiography - coronary arteries - coronary artery disease - computed tomography - magnetic resonance imaging - imaging
Literatur
- 1 ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 . Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48 1475-1492
- 2 Achenbach S. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48 1919-1928
- 3 Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A. et al . Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2006; 57 331-335
- 4 Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle F K. et al . Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16(0.75 mm collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26 1978-1986
- 5 Cademartiri F, Runza G, Mollet N R. et al . Impact of intravascular enhancement, heart rate, and calcium score on diagnostic accuracy in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Radiol Med (Torino). 2005; 110 42-51
- 6 Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B. Multislice CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of the coronary arteries. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2006; 178 600-604
- 7 Dewey M, Teige F, Schnappauf D. et al . Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses with Multislice Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145 407-415
- 8 Dix W R, Kupper W, Dill T. et al . Comparison of intravenous coronary angiography using synchrotron radiation with selective coronary angiography. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2003; 10 219-227
- 9 Fine J J, Hopkins C B, Ruff N, Newton F C. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97 173-174
- 10 Garcia M J, Lessick J, Hoffmann M H. CATSCAN Study Investigators . Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006; 296 403-411
- 11 Ghostine S, Caussin C, Daoud B. et al . Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48 1929-1934
- 12 Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D. et al . Noninvasive Visualization of Coronary Arteries Using Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector CT: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Stenosis Detection. Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179 911-916
- 13 Gilard M, Cornily J C, Pennec P Y. et al . Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47 2020-2024
- 14 Gilard M, Cornily J C, Rioufol G, Finet G, Pennec P Y, Mansourati J, Blanc J J, Boschat J. Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95 110-112
- 15 Hauser T H, Manning W J. Coronary MRI: More pretty pictures or present-day value?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48 1951-1952
- 16 Herzog C, Abolmaali N, Balzer J O. et al . Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12 2670-2678
- 17 Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, Eichler K, Hammerstingl R, Dogan S, Ackermann H, Vogl T J. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: Influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology. 2006; 238 75-86
- 18 Hoffmann M H, Shi H, Manzke R. et al . Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology. 2005; 234 86-97
- 19 Hoffmann M H, Shi H, Schmitz B L. et al . Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA. 2005; 293 2471-3478
- 20 Hoffmann U, Nagurney J T, Moselewski F. et al . Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation. 2006; 114 2251-2260
- 21 Johnson T R, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger B J. et al . Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16 1409-1415
- 22 Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T. et al . Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Heart. 2005; 91 938-941
- 23 Lambertz H, Lethen H, Tries H P, Kersting S. Non-invasive assessment of coronary flow reserve - valuable functional information in cardiac workflow. Ultraschall Med. 2004; 25 25-33
- 24 Lambertz H, Tries H P, Stein T, Lethen H. Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic signal-enhanced Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999; 12 186-195
- 25 Leber A W, Knez A, von Ziegler F. et al . Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46 147-154
- 26 Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A. et al . Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26 1482-1487
- 27 Lethen H, Tries H P, Brechtken J, Kersting S, Lambertz H. Comparison of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to intracoronary Doppler guidewire measurements for assessment of coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending artery for detection of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91 412-417
- 28 Manghat N E, Morgan-Hughes G J, Broadley A J. et al . 16-detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve replacement: comparison with catheter angiography. Clin Radiol. 2006; 61 749-757
- 29 McCann R L, Schwartz L B, Pieper K S. Vascular complications of cardiac catheterization. J Vasc Surg. 1991; 14 375-381
- 30 Meijboom W B, Mollet N R, von Mieghem C AG. et al . Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48 1658-1665
- 31 Mollet N R, Cademartiri F, Krestin G P. et al . Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45 128-132
- 32 Mollet N R, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem C A. et al . High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005; 112 2318-2323
- 33 Morgan-Hughes G J, Roobottom C A, Owens P E, Marshall A J. Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography. Heart. 2005; 91 308-313
- 34 Nassenstein K, Waltering K U, Eggebrecht H, Schlosser T, Hunold P, Barkhausen J. MR-Koronarangiographie mit MS-325, einem Blood-Pool-Kontrastmittel: Vergleich einer Inversion Recovery Steady-State Free Precession und einer Inversion recovery Fast Low Angle Shot Sequenz in Probanden. RöFo. 2006; 178 508-514
- 35 Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C. et al . Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Radiol. 2006; 187 111-117
- 36 Paetsch I, Huber M E, Bornstedt A. et al . Improved three. Dimensional free-breathing coronary magnetic resonance angiography using gadocoletic acid (B-22 956) for intravascular contrast enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20 288-293
- 37 Raff G J, Gallagher M J, OŽNeill W W, Goldstein J A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46 552-557
- 38 Reant P, Brunot S, Lafitte S. et al . Predictive value of noninvasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography to detect significant coronary stenosis before valve surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97 1506-1510
- 39 Redberg R F, Sobol Y, Chou T M, Malloy M, Kumar S, Botvinick E, Kane J. Adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation during transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Rapid and safe measurement of coronary flow reserve ratio can predict significant left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Circulation. 1995; 92 190-196
- 40 Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D. et al . Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27 2567-2572
- 41 Ropers D, Pohle F K, Kuettner A. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation. 2006; 114 2334-2341
- 42 Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K. et al . Usefulness of multidetector row computed tomography with 64 × 0.6 mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97 343-348
- 43 Salm L P, Bax J J, Jukema J W. et al . Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J. 2005; 150 775-781
- 44 Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A. et al . Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16 2739-2747
- 45 Schroeder S, Kopp A F, Kuettner A. et al . Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging. 2002; 26 106-111
- 46 Schuijf J D, Bax J J, Shaw L J. et al . Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J. 2006; 151 404-411
- 47 Suzuki A, Takemura A, Inaba R, Sinibe T, Tsuchiya K, Korenaga T. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography to evaluate coronary arterial lesions in patients with Kawasaki disease. Cardiol Young. 2006; 16 563-571
- 48 Takeda T, Itai Y, Wu J. et al . Two-dimensional intravenous coronary arteriography using above-K-edge monochromatic synchrotron X-ray. Acad Radiol. 1995; 2 602-608
- 49 Van Buuren F, Horstkotte D. 21. Bericht über die Leistungszahlen der Herzkatheterlabore in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006; 95 383-387
- 50 Van Mieghem C A, Cademartiri F, Mollet N R. et al . Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2006; 114 645-653
- 51 Varghese A, Keegan J, Pennell D J. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of anomalous coronary arteries. Coron Artery Dis. 2005; 16 355-364
Prof. Dr. S. Achenbach
Medizinische Klinik 2, (Kardiologie und Angiologie), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Ulmenweg 18
91054 Erlangen
Email: stephan.achenbach@med2.med.uni-erlangen.de