PDF herunterladen
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007; 20(2): 125-132
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-977491
Copyright © 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Rectal Prolapse

David P. O'Brien1  IV 
  • 1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
09. Mai 2007 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Despite the innovation of more than 100 surgical procedures for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse, no one procedure is best and applicable to all patients. Traditionally, procedures have been divided into abdominal and perineal approaches. The application of the laparoscopic approach to colon and rectal disease has allowed an additional less invasive method of therapy to treat rectal prolapse successfully. In comparison with conventional approaches, laparoscopy has achieved similar functional results and recurrence rates while reducing postoperative pain and hospital length of stay.

KEYWORDS

Rectal prolapse - laparoscopy - rectopexy - colon - rectum

REFERENCES

  • 1 Corman M L. Rectal prolapse, solitary rectal ulcer, syndrome of the descending perineum, and rectocele. Colon and Rectal Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2004: 1408
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller J M. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;  (2) CD003145
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Delaney C P, Kiran R P, Senagore A J, Brady K, Fazio V W. Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.  Ann Surg. 2003;  238 67-72
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Madoff R D, Mellgren A. One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 441-450
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Broden B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1968;  11 330-347
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Shorvon P J, McHugh S, Diamant N E, Somers S, Stevenson G W. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.  Gut. 1989;  30 1737-1749
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hull T L. Rectal prolapse: abdominal approach.  Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2003;  16 259-262
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Madiba T E, Baig M K, Wexner S D. Surgical management of rectal prolapse.  Arch Surg. 2005;  140 63-73
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Halligan S, Sultan A, Rottenberg G, Bartram C I. Endosonography of the anal sphincters in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;  10 79-82
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Woods R, Voyvodic F, Schloithe A C, Sage M R, Wattchow D A. Anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.  Colorectal Dis. 2003;  5 544-548
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Dvorkin L S, Chan C L, Knowles C H et al.. Anal sphincter morphology in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 198-203
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Spencer R J. Manometric studies in rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 523-525
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Farouk R, Duthie G S, MacGregor A B, Bartolo D C. Rectoanal inhibition and incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 743-746
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Broden G, Dolk A, Holmstrom B. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988;  3 23-28
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Williams J G, Wong W D, Jensen L, Rothenberger D A, Goldberg S M. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 209-216
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Sainio A P, Voutilainen P E, Husa A I. Recovery of anal sphincter function following transabdominal repair of rectal prolapse: cause of improved continence?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 816-821
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hiltunen K M, Matikainen M. Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;  7 8-10
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Farouk R, Duthie G S, Bartolo D C, MacGregor A B. Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 439-440
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Schultz I, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Johansson C, Holmstrom B. Continence is improved after the Ripstein rectopexy. Different mechanisms in rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 300-306
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Poen A C, de Brauw M, Felt-Bersma R J, de Jong D, Cuesta M A. Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests.  Surg Endosc. 1996;  10 904-908
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kairaluoma M V, Kellokumpu I H. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse.  Scand J Surg. 2005;  94 207-210
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Womack N R, Williams N S, Holmfield J H, Morrison J F. Pressure and prolapse-the cause of solitary rectal ulceration.  Gut. 1987;  28 1228-1233
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Wexner S D. Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 899-905
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Speakman C T, Madden M V, Nicholls R J, Kamm M A. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 1431-1433
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 McKee R F, Lauder J C, Poon F W, Aitchison M A, Finlay I G. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;  174 145-148
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Allen-Mersh T G, Turner M J, Mann C V. Effect of abdominal Ivalon rectopexy on bowel habit and rectal wall.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;  33 550-553
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Gosselin A et al.. Constipation after rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Where is the obstruction?.  Dig Dis Sci. 1993;  38 1801-1808
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wassef R, Rothenberger D A, Goldberg S M. Rectal prolapse.  Curr Probl Surg. 1986;  23 397-451
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Marceau C, Parc Y, Debroux E, Tiret E, Parc R. Complete rectal prolapse in young patients: psychiatric disease a risk factor of poor outcome.  Colorectal Dis. 2005;  7 360-365
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Glasgow S C, Birnbaum E H, Kodner I J, Fleshman J W, Dietz D W. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49 1052-1058
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Schultz I, Mellgren A, Nilsson B Y, Dolk A, Holmstrom B. Preoperative electrophysiologic assessment cannot predict continence after rectopexy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 1392-1398
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Johansen O B, Wexner S D, Daniel N, Nogueras J J, Jagelman D G. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 767-772
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Madbouly K M, Senagore A J, Delaney C P et al.. Clinically based management of rectal prolapse.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 99-103
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Gregorcyk S G. Perineal proctosigmoidectomy: the procedure of choice for rectal prolapse.  Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2003;  16 263-269
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Altemeier W A, Culbertson W R, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J. Nineteen years' experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse.  Ann Surg. 1971;  173 993-1006
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Deen K I, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley M R. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 302-304
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Williams J G, Rothenberger D A, Madoff R D, Goldberg S M. Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 830-834
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Agachan F, Reissman P, Pfeifer J et al.. Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.  South Med J. 1997;  90 925-932
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Kohler A, Athanasiadis S. The value of posterior levator repair in the treatment of anorectal incontinence due to rectal prolapse-a clinical and manometric study.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;  386 188-192
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Chun S W, Pikarsky A J, You S Y et al.. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse: role of levatorplasty.  Tech Coloproctol. 2004;  8 3-8 discussion 8-9
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Edmond Delorme 1847-1929. On the treatment of total prolapse of the rectum by excision of the rectal mucous membranes or recto-colic.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 544-553
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Pescatori M, Interisano A, Stolfi V M, Zoffoli M. Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;  13 223-227
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M. Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1260-1265
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Felt-Bersma R J, Cuesta M A. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.  Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2001;  30 199-222
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Mollen R M, Kuijpers J H, van Hoek F. Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1283-1287
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Frykman H M, Goldberg S M. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;  129 1225-1230
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;  7 219-222
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Ripstein C B. Surgical care of massive rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1965;  8 34-38
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Gordon P H, Hoexter B. Complications of the Ripstein procedure.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1978;  21 277-280
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse.  Proc R Soc Med. 1959;  52 602-603
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Douard R, Frileux P, Brunel M et al.. Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1089-1096
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Ross A H, Thomson J P. Management of infection after prosthetic abdominal rectopexy (Wells' procedure).  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 610-612
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Athanasiadis S, Weyand G, Heiligers J, Heumuller L, Barthelmes L. The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;  11 42-44
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults.  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online). 2000;  (2) CD001758
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Reitano M C et al.. Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse.  Dig Surg. 1999;  16 415-419
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Solomon M J, Young C J, Eyers A A, Roberts R A. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 35-39
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T et al.. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1930-1940
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy.  Br J Surg. 2004;  91 1188-1191
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Raftopoulos Y, Senagore A J, Di Giuro G, Bergamaschi R. Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1200-1206
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Hool G R, Hull T L, Fazio V W. Surgical treatment of recurrent complete rectal prolapse: a thirty-year experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 270-272
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Steele S R, Goetz L H, Minami S et al.. Management of recurrent rectal prolapse: surgical approach influences outcome.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49 440-445
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Pikarsky A J, Joo J S, Wexner S D et al.. Recurrent rectal prolapse: what is the next good option?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1273-1276
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 Delaney C P, Senagore A J. Current Therapy in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA; Elsevier Mosby 2005: 624
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Tsugawa K, Sue K, Koyanagi N et al.. Laparoscopic rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse: a safe and simple procedure without a mesh prosthesis.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;  49 1549-1551
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar

David P O'Brien IVM.D. 

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

2123 Auburn Ave., Ste. 524, Cincinnati, OH 45219

eMail: obriendd@uc.edu