Enantio- and Diastereoselective Hydrogenation of a Fluorinated Diketone

Abstract

Asymmetric hydrogenation of dibenzoyl-difluoro­methane has been studied for the first time. In contrast to ­BINAL-H, baker’s yeast and CBS reduction procedures, ruthenium-catalysed hydrogenation using axially chiral diphosphine ligands provides excellent yield, diastereoselectivity and good enantioselectivity (up to 72% ee). Enantiomer enrichment by recrystallisation allows for the pure fluorinated diol to be isolated as a single enantiomer in moderate yield.

homogeneous catalysis - hydrogenation - asymmetric synthesis - diols - organofluorine compounds

References and Notes

1a Ma J.-A. Cahard D. Chem. Rev.  2004,  104:  6119 ; and references cited therein

1b Schofield H. J. Fluorine Chem.  1999,  100:  7 

1c Organofluorine Compounds: Chemistry and Applications   Hiyama T. Springer; New York: 2000. 

2a Casey CP. Paulsen EL. Beuttenmueller EW. Proft BR. Petrovich LM. Matter BA. Powell DR. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1997,  119:  11817 

2b Clarke ML. Elliss D. Mason KL. Orpen AG. Pringle PG. Wingad R. Zaheer DA. Dalton Trans.  2005,  1294 ; and references cited therein

2c Seayad A. Ahmed M. Klein H. Jackstell R. Gross T. Beller M. Science  2002,  1676 

2d Jeulin S. Duprat de Paule S. Ratovelomanana-Vidal V. Genêt J.-P. Champion N. Dellis P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  320 

3a Forni A. Moretti I. Prosyanik AV. Torre G. Chem. Commun.  1981,  588 ; and references cited therein

3b Pirkle WH. Sukkenga DL. Pavlin MS. J. Org. Chem.  1977,  42:  384 

4 Surya Prakash GK. Hu J. Mathew T. Olah GA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2003,  42:  5216 

5 Banks RE. Lawrence NJ. Popplewell AL. Chem. Commun.  1994,  343 

6 Noyori R. Tomino I. Yamada M. Nishizawa M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1984,  106:  6717 

7 Corey EJ. Bakshi RK. Tetrahedron Lett.  1990,  31:  611 

8a Bubrovina NV. Tararov VI. Monsees A. Kadyrov R. Fischer C. Borner A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2003,  14:  2739 

8b Pini D. Mandoli A. Iulano A. Salvadori P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1995,  6:  1031 

8c Ireland T. Grossheimann G. Weiser-Jeunesse C. Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  1999,  38:  3213 

9

General Procedures for Catalyst PreparationMethod 1: To a dried microwave tube was added benzeneruthenium chloride dimer (1.7 mg, 0.0034 mmol) and diphosphine (0.0068 mmol) and the air was evacuated and replaced with argon. To the mixture was added anhyd DMF (1 mL) and the mixture stirred under argon at 100 °C for 10 min. The DMF was removed in vacuo at 50 °C to give the catalyst.
Method 2:¹⁴ To a dried microwave tube was added [RuCOD(η³-2-methyl-allyl)₂] (4.6 mg, 0.014 mmol) and diphosphine (0.014 mmol) and the air displaced with argon. To this was added anhyd acetone (1 mL) followed by HBr solution [122 µL, 0.035 mmol of a solution prepared by adding acetyl bromide (22 µL) to MeOH (1 mL) in a dry Schlenk tube]. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at r.t. before removing the solvent in vacuo to give the catalyst.
Method 3: To a dried microwave tube was added benzeneruthenium chloride dimer (1.7 mg, 0.0034 mmol) and diphosphine (0.0068 mmol) and the air displaced with argon. Anhyd THF (3 mL) was added and the mixture heated in a microwave at 120 °C for 10 min. The solvent was removed in vacuo to give the catalyst.
Method 4: The [Ru(Diphos)(DPEN)Cl₂] complex was prepared by Noyori’s method.¹⁰

10a A range of Noyori-type catalysts were screened with scant success. See: Noyori R. Ohkuma T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  40 ; and references cited therein

10b A Ru catalyst that can normally reduce even poorly reactive C=O bonds was also completely ineffective. See: Clarke ML. Diaz-Valenzuela MB. Slawin AMZ. Organometallics  2007,  26:  16 

11 Noyori R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2002,  41:  2008 ; and references cited therein

12 De Paule SD. Jeuline S. Ratovelomanana-Vidal V. Genêt J.-P. Chanpion N. Delis P. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  823 

13

General Procedure for Catalytic Hydrogenation: An autoclave containing a reaction vial charged with catalyst and stirring bead was charged with diketone 1 (0.34 mmol). Anhydrous degassed solvent was added to the vial under an N₂ atmosphere. The autoclave was sealed, flushed with hydrogen, and brought to the initial pressure (50 bar) and stirred at 50 °C for 16 h. The mixture was concentrated in vacuo and an NMR taken of the resulting solid. The product was recrystallised from CH₂Cl₂ to give white needles. The anti/syn ratio was determined by ¹⁹F NMR and the ee value by HPLC.
Compound (+)-2a: [α]_D ²⁰ +37.8 (c 1.14, MeOH); mp 180 °C. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.49-7.36 (10 H, m, ArH), 5.08 (2 H, td J = 13, 4 Hz, CHOH), 3.10 (2 H, d J = 4 Hz, CHOH) ppm. ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 138.8 (ArC), 128.6, 128.1, 128.0 (ArCH), 121.5 (t, J = 250.5 Hz, CF₂), 70.4 (t, J = 28.0 Hz, CHOH) ppm. ¹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = -119.24 (2 F, s, anti). Note that the syn-diol is distinguishable by ¹⁹F NMR spectroscopy: -120.05 (1 F, d J = 255 Hz, syn), -127.23 (1 F, d J = 255 Hz, syn) ppm. MS (ES⁺): m/z = 287 [M + Na]⁺. MS (ES^-): m/z = 263 [M - H]^-. HPLC: Chiralpak AD, 93:3 hexane-i-PrOH, 1 mL/min, 210 nm; t _R = 19.84 [(+)-enantiomer], 34.24 [(-)-enantiomer], 37.52 (syn) min.

14 Genêt J.-P. Ratovelomanana-Vidal V. Cano de Andrade MC. Pfister X. Guerreiro P. Lenoir JY. Tetrahedron Lett.  1995,  36:  4801