Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-987082
HPLC evaluation of water-soluble extracts of Chamaenerion angustifolium L. and Pentaphylloides fruticosa L
Infusions of aerial parts of Ivan-tea (Chamaenerion angustifolium, Onagraceae) and Kurilian tea (Pentaphylloides fruticosa, Rosaceae) have been used in Russia for a long time as home made teas. The data about the chemical composition of these plants are limited. Dry water-soluble extracts of C. angustifolium (5 series) and P. fruticosa were investigated. The botanical material was dried at 40°C for 5–6h. After comminution, the tea was placed in heaps on outside platforms, wetted and bruised to initiate „fermentation“, and fermented for 6h at 40–41°C (except the unfermented sample). Fermented teas were sampled from the heaps and dried at 40°C for 4–6h. The material obtained was suspended in water and extracted for 2h. The resulting aqueous extracts were filtered, reduced in volume in vacuo, dried, and stored at 4°C. The extracts were analyzed by RP HPLC coupled with PDA detection. Results of the analysis of the extracts are presented in table below.
Table 1. Qualitative-quantitative data for a water soluble extracts of C. angustifolium and P. fruticosa
Identified components, mg/g |
|||||||
Extract |
Total |
L-asc. acid |
Gallic acid |
Protocatechuic acid |
Hyperoside |
Ellagic acid |
Octyl |
C. angustifolium |
|||||||
Express |
194.4±7.9 |
ND |
2.08±0.10 |
2.88±0.14 |
2.93±0.14 |
0.96±0.05 |
0.12±0.01 |
Lotos |
145.5±14.2 |
ND |
1.07±0.05 |
3.22±0.15 |
3.00±0.14 |
0.59±0.02 |
0.15±0.01 |
Tver |
206.9±19.4 |
15.9±0.8 |
4.70±0.18 |
ND |
2.82±0.10 |
1.07±0.06 |
0.08±0.01 |
Diod |
156.8±11.4 |
17.7±0.9 |
4.46±0.16 |
ND |
3.53±0.15 |
1.18±0.06 |
0.08±0.01 |
Nonfermented |
209.4±4.2 |
6.1±0.1 |
4.47±0.24 |
ND |
2.92±0.14 |
1.06±0.05 |
0.09±0.01 |
P. fruticosa |
160.6±14.5 |
9.4±0.4 |
4.04±0.20 |
ND |
3.08±0.14 |
1.01±0.03 |
0.08±0.01 |
All the extracts of C. angustifolium contained gallic acid, hyperoside, ellagic acid, and octyl gallate. L-ascorbic acid was identified only in Tver, Diod and nonfermented extracts. Protocatechuic acid was identified only in Express and Lotos extracts. Extract of P. fruticosa contained L-ascorbic acid, gallic acid, hyperoside, ellagic acid and octyl gallate. Protocatechuic acid was not detected in this extract. It can be seen that the water-soluble extracts of C. angustifolium and P. fruticosa in general have similar chromatographic profiles and active components in equivalent concentration.