Influence of the Developmental Stage on the (Proto)-Hypericin and (Proto)Pseudohypericin Levels of Hypericum Plants from Crete

Abstract

The contents of (pseudo)hypericin and their immediate precursors were studied in wild populations of various Hypericum species on the island of Crete, Greece. Therefore, the aerial parts of wild grown H. perforatum, H. triquentrifolium, H. empetrifolium and H. perfoliatum shoots were collected throughout the island and the quantitative variations in (proto)hypericin and (proto)pseudohypericin examined. The plant material was harvested at different stages of the life cycle of the species and the contents in the above-mentioned compounds analyzed discriminating between flowers/fruits and leaves/petioles. HPLC analysis of hypericin, pseudohypericin and their immediate precursors, protohypericin and protopseudohypericin, revealed great differences in the contents of the compounds in dependence on the developmental stage of the plants. In all examined species the highest concentrations of hypericin were found during blossoming whereas the lowest concentrations were present during ripening of the fruits. H. perforatum and H. triquentrifolium show much higher hypericin levels in flowers/fruits compared to leaves/petioles, whereas the species H. empetrifolium and H. perfoliatum show similar concentrations of total hypericins in both flowers/fruits and leaves/petioles. In the different species the levels of (proto)hypericin and (proto)pseudohypericin varied, but in almost all samples from flowers/fruits and leaves/petioles the ratio of (proto)hypericin to (proto)pseudohypericin was higher than one. When the total amount of hypericins per entire aerial part of a plant was calculated for all developmental stages, we found that H. perforatum contained the highest amount of hypericin. This in combination with the comparatively high concentration of hypericins in flowers/fruits and in leaves/petioles in this species, as well as the high ratio of (proto)hypericin to (proto)pseudohypericin, especially during the developmental stage of blossoming, encourages us to think about the possibility of cultivating Hypericum perforatum in Crete as a medicinal plant in the future.

Key words

Developmental stages - Hypericaceae - Hypericum species - hypericin - protohypericin - pseudohypericin - protopseudohypericin

References

• 1 Robson N KB. Studies in the genus Hypericum L. (Guttiferae).  Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Bot. 1987;  20 1-151.
• 2 Ciccarelli D, Andreucci A A, Pagni A M. Translucent glands and secretory canals in Hypericum perforatum L. (Hypericaceae): morphological, anatomical and histochemical studies during the course of ontogenesis.  Ann Bot. 2001;  88 637-44.
• 3 Falk H. From the photosensitizer hypericin to the photoreceptor stentorin - the chemistry of phenanthroperylene quinones.  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1999;  38 3116-36.
• 4 Laudahn D. High dosed St. John’s wort extract for treatment of mild and moderate depressions.  Acta Horticult. 1993;  332 265-72.
• 5 Brantner A, Della Loggia R, Sosa S, Kartnig T. Untersuchungen zur antiphlogistischen Wirkung von Hypericum perforatum L.  Sci Pharm. 1994;  62 7-8.
• 6 Hudson J B, Lopez-Bazzocchi I, Towers G HN. Antiviral activities of hypericin.  Antiviral Res. 1991;  15 101-12.
• 7 Lavie G, Valentine F, Levin B, Mazur Y, Gallo G, Lavie D, Weiner D, Meruelo D. Studies of the mechanisms of action of the antiretroviral agents’ hypericins and pseudohypericin.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;  86 5963-7.
• 8 Schempp C M, Simon-Haarhaus B, Simon J C. Phototoxic and apoptosis-inducing capacity of pseudohypericin.  Planta Med. 2002;  68 171-3.
• 9 Weber N D, Murray B K, North J A, Wood S G. The antiviral agent hypericin has in vitro activity against HIV-1 through non-specific association with viral and cellular mebrames.  Antiviral Chem Chemother. 1994;  5 83-90.
• 10 Cellarova E, Daxnerova Z, Kimakova K, Haluskova J. The variability of the hypericin content in the regenerants of Hypericum perforatum .  Acta Biotechnol. 1994;  14 267-74.
• 11 Dixon R A, Paiva N. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism.  Plant Cell. 1995;  7 1085-97.
• 12 Schwob I, Bessiere J M, Masotti V, Viano J. Changes in essential oil composition in St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) aerial parts during its phenological cycle.  Biochem Syst Ecol. 2004;  32 735-45.
• 13 Tekel’ova D, Repcák M, Zemkova E, Toth J. Quantitative changes of dianthrones, hyperforin and flavonoids content in the flower ontogenesis of Hypericum perforatum .  Planta Med. 2000;  66 778-80.
• 14 Gray D E, Pallardy S G, Garrett H E, Rottinghaus G E. Effects of acute drought stress and time harvest on phytochemistry and dry weight of St. John’s wort leaves and flowers.  Planta Med. 2003;  69 1024-30.
• 15 Abreu I N, Porto A LM, Marsaioli A J, Mazzafera P. Distribution of bioactive substances from Hypericum brasilience during plant growth.  Plant Sci. 2004;  167 949-54.
• 16 Southwell I A, Bourke C A. Seasonal variation in hypericin content of Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John’s wort).  Phytochemistry. 2001;  56 437-41.
• 17 Couceiro M A, Afreen F, Zobayed S MA, Kozai T. Variation in concentrations of major bioactive compounds of St. John’s wort: Effects of harvesting time, temperature and germplasm.  Plant Sci. 2005;  170 128-34.
• 18 Southwell I A, Campbell M H. Hypericin content variation in Hypericum perforatum in Australia.  Phytochemistry. 1991;  30 475-8.
• 19 Mathis C, Ourisson G. Functional analysis by thin layer chromatography.  J Chromatogr. 1963;  12 94-6.
• 20 Hoelzl J, Ostrowski E. St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) HPLC analysis of the main components and their variability in a population.  Dtsch Apoth Ztg. 1987;  127 1227-30.
• 21 Jensen K IN, Gaul S O, Specht E G, Doohan D J. Hypericin content of Nova Scotia biotypes of Hypericum perforatum L.  Can J Plant Sci. 1995;  75 923-6.
• 22 Kitanov G M. Hypericin and pseudohypericin content in some Hypericum species.  Biochem Syst Ecol. 2001;  29 171-8.
• 23 Repcak M, Martonfi P. The localization of secondary substances in Hypericum perforatum flowers.  Biologia, Section Botany. 1997;  52 91-4.

1 Both authors contributed equally to this work