PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2007; 28(4): 303-318
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-990717
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Levels and Input/Output-Growth Functions in Normal-Hearing Individuals with Tinnitus and/or Hyperacusis

Grazyna Bartnik1 , Monica L. Hawley3 , Marek Rogowski1 , 2 , Danuta Raj-Koziak1 , Anna Fabijanska1 , Craig Formby3 , 4
  • 1The Tinnitus Clinic at the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
  • 2Medical University of Bialystok, Department of Otolaryngology, Bialystok, Poland
  • 3University of Maryland Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Center and Department of Otorhinolaryngology-HNS, University of Maryland School of Mediciane, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 4Present address: College of Arts & Science, Engineering and Medicine, Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
17. Oktober 2007 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine whether distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) can be used to distinguish among four groups with audiometrically normal-hearing sensitivity: (1) control adults without tinnitus or hyperacusis, (2) patients with tinnitus alone, (3) patients with hyperacusis alone, and (4) patients with both tinnitus and hyperacusis. Two types of DPOAE measures were evaluated: (1) the distortion product- (DP-) gram measured with fixed primary levels as a function of frequency, and (2) DPOAE input/output (I/O) functions for a range of primary levels between 45 and 70 dB sound pressure level (SPL) at 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. DP-grams did not clearly distinguish between the control and patient groups. There was, however, a consistent trend for the three patient groups to have decreased average DP levels at 4000 and 6000 Hz; this notch in the DP-gram was not observed in the response configuration for the control group. In the three patient groups, 51 to 74% of these individuals had DP levels that were outside of the 95% confidence range for the control group. The average slopes of the I/O growth functions for each of the patient groups were consistently steeper than those for the control group; however, the slope values were indistinguishable among the patient groups. About 60% of the patients' DPOAE responses (in each group) were categorized as abnormal based on their slope values. Thus, DPOAE measures can be used with at least partial success to distinguish controls from patients with tinnitus, hyperacusis, or both tinnitus and hyperacusis, but not to discriminate among the respective patient groups. These findings suggest that the pathology represented among the patient groups is consistent at the level of the cochlea; however, diagnostic tests targeted at higher centers of processing are needed if the individuals in these groups are to be distinguished among themselves.

KEYWORDS

Tinnitus - hyperacusis - distortion product otoacoustic emissions - DPOAE

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B et al.. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;  93 2050-2060
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.  Ear Hear. 1990;  11 144-154
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Otoacoustic emissions and tinnitus. In: Snow JB Jr Tinnitus: Theory and Management. London, UK; BC Decker 2004: 69-78
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Brownell W E. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions.  Ear Hear. 1990;  11 82-92
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Dorn P A, Konrad-Martin D, Neely S T, Keefe D, Cyr E, Gorga M P. Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;  110 3119-3131
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gorga M P, Neely S T, Ohlrich B, Hoover B, Redner J, Peters J. From laboratory to clinic: a large-scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.  Ear Hear. 1997;  18 440-455
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Lonsbury-Martin B L, McCoy M J, Whitehead M L, Martin K M. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.  Ear Hear. 1993;  14 11-22
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Dorn P A, Piskorski P, Gorga M P, Neely S T, Keefe D H. Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses.  Ear Hear. 1999;  20 149-163
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bartnik G, Fabijanska A, Raj-Koziak D, Borawska B, Rogowski M, Skarzynski H. The correlation between the pitch of tinnitus and DP-gram and audiogram.  Audiofonologia (Polish). 2001;  XX 133-141
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bartnik G, Rogowski M, Fabijańska A, Raj-Koziak D, Borawska B. DPOAE assessment of cochlear function in tinnitus patients with normal hearing. In: Patuzzi R Proceedings of VIIth International Tinnitus Seminar. Crawley, Australia; University of Western Australia 2002: 45-47
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Clark W W, Kim D O, Zurek P M, Bohne B A. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones.  Hear Res. 1984;  16 299-314
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hazell J W. Models of tinnitus: generation, perception, clinical implications. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 57-69
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Jastreboff P J. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception.  Neurosci Res. 1990;  8 221-254
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Tonndorf J. The analogy between tinnitus and pain: a suggestion for a physiological basis of chronic tinnitus. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 237-255
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Zenner H P, Ernst A. Cochlear motor tinnitus, transduction tinnitus, and signal transfer tinnitus: three models of cochlear tinnitus. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 237-255
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Janssen T, Kummer P, Arnold W. Growth behavior of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;  103 3418-3430
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Stypulkowski P H. Physiological Mechanisms of Salicylate Ototoxicity. Storrs, CT; University of Connecticut 1989: 1-176
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Risey J A, Guth P S, Amedee R G. Furosemide distinguished central and peripheral tinnitus.  Int Tinnitus J. 1995;  1 99-103
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Tyler R S. Comment on animal models of tinnitus. In: Evered D, Lawrenson G Tinnitus. London, UK; Pitman Books 1981: 136-137
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Jastreboff P J. Tinnitus as a phantom perception. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 73-93
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Meikle M B. The interaction of central and peripheral mechanisms in tinnitus. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 181-206
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Møller A R. Pathophysiology of tinnitus. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 207-217
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Brummet R E. A mechanism for tinnitus?. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 7-10
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Mühlau M, Rauschecker J P, Oestreicher E et al.. Structural brain changes in tinnitus.  Cereb Cortex. 2006;  16 1283-1288
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hazell J W, Sheldrake J B. Hyperacusis and tinnitus. In: Aran JM, Dauman R Proceedings of the IVth International Tinnitus Seminar. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Kugler 1992: 245-248
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Formby C, Gold S L. Modification of loudness discomfort level: evidence for adaptive chronic auditory gain and its clinical relevance.  Semin Hear. 2002;  23 21-34
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Marriage J, Barnes N M. Is central hyperacusis a symptom of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) dysfunction?.  J Laryngol Otol. 1995;  109 915-921
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Hesse G, Masri S, Nelting M, Brehmer D. Hypermotility of outer hair cells: DPOAE findings with hyperacusis patients. In: Hazell J Proceedings of the VIth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 342-344
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Jastreboff P J. Tinnitus habituation therapy (THT) and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT). In: Tyler R Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego, CA; Singular 2000: 357-376
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Gerken G M. Central auditory processing: alterations produced by factors involving the cochlea. In: Dancer A, Henderson D, Salvi R, Hamermik RP Effects of Noise on the Auditory System. Philadelphia, PA; Mosby 1992: 146-155
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Gerken G M. Alteration of central auditory processing of brief stimuli: a review and a neural model.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;  93 2038-2049
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 McFadden S L, Kasper C, Ostrowski J, Ding D, Salvi R J. Effects of inner hair cell loss on inferior colliculus evoked potential thresholds, amplitudes and forward masking functions in chinchillas.  Hear Res. 1998;  120 121-132
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Qiu C, Salvi R, Ding D, Burkard R. Inner hair cell loss leads to enhanced response amplitudes in auditory cortex of unanesthetized chinchillas: evidence for increased system gain.  Hear Res. 2000;  139 153-171
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Salvi R J, Wang J, Ding D. Auditory plasticity and hyperactivity following cochlear damage.  Hear Res. 2000;  147 261-274
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Coles R A. Psychophysiological dimensions of tinnitus. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 1-6
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Penner M J. Psychophysical observations and the origin of tinnitus. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 219-230
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Hall III J W. Handbook of Otoacoustic Emissions. San Diego, CA; Singular 1999
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Lepage E L. A model for cochlear origin of subjective tinnitus. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 115-147
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Janssen T, Arnold W. Growth function of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in cochlear tinnitus.  Otorhinolaryngol Nova. 1995;  5 127-144
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Mitchell C, Lilly D J, Henry J. Otoacoustic emissions in subjects with tinnitus and normal hearing. In: Reich G, Vernon J Proceedings of the Vth International Tinnitus Seminar. Portland, OR; American Tinnitus Association 1995: 180-185
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Norton S J, Schmidt A R, Stover L J. Tinnitus and otoacoustic emissions: is there a link?.  Ear Hear. 1990;  11 159-166
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Shiomi Y, Tsuji J, Naito Y, Fujiki N, Yamamoto N. Characteristics of DPOAE audiogram in tinnitus patients.  Hear Res. 1997;  108 83-88
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Gaskill S A, Brown A M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;  88 821-839
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Popelka G R, Osterhammel P A, Nielsen L H, Rasmussen A N. Growth of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with primary-tone level in humans.  Hear Res. 1993;  71 12-22
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Hughson W, Westlake H. Manual for program outline for rehabilitation of aural casualties, both military and civilian.  Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1944;  48(suppl) 1-15
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 International Organization for Standardization 389-1 .Acoustics-Reference for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment. Part 1: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Supra-Aural Earphones. Geneva, Switzerland; International Organization for Standardization 1989
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Feldman H. Mechanisms of tinnitus. In: Vernon J, Møller A Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 35-49
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Stypulkowski P H. Mechanisms of salicylate ototoxicity.  Hear Res. 1990;  46 113-145
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Ruggero M A, Rich N C, Recio A, Narayan S S, Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of chinchilla cochlea.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;  101 2151-2163
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Liberman M C. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound.  Hear Res. 1989;  38 47-56
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Brown M C. Morphology and response properties of single olivocochlear fibers in the guinea pig.  Hear Res. 1989;  40 93-110
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Formby C, Gold S L, Keaser M, Block K L, Hawley M L. A secondary benefit from tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT): clinically significant increases in loudness discomfort level and in the auditory dynamic range.  Semin Hear. 2007;  28 227-260
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Lukashkin A N, Russell I J. Modification of a signal saturating non-linearity account for post-onset changes in 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;  112 1561-1568
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Mills D. Interpretation of standard distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements in light of the complete parametric response.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;  112 1545-1560
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Whitehead M L. Species differences of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: comment on “Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement. I. Two stimulus tones”.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;  103 2740-2742
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 He N J, Schmiedt R A. Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;  94 2659-2669
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar

Craig FormbyPh.D. 

Dept. of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama

700 University Blvd., Rm 1451, Box 870242, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0242

eMail: cformby@as.ua.edu