Download PDF
Endoscopy 2007; 39(12): 1105-1106
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995377
Correction

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts

Consensus statements for small-bowel capsule endoscopy, 2006/2007K.  Mergener1 , T.  Ponchon2 , I.  Gralnek3 , M.  Pennazio4 , G.  Gay5 , W.  Selby6 , E.  G.  Seidman7 , C.  Cellier8 , J.  Murray9 , R.  de Franchis10 , T.  Rösch11 , B.  S.  Lewis12
  • 1Digestive Health Specialists, Tacoma, Washington, USA
  • 2Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
  • 3Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • 4S. Giovanni A.S. Hospital, Turin, Italy
  • 5Hôpitaux de Brabois, CHU de Nancy, France
  • 6AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Center, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • 7McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
  • 8European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
  • 9Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • 10University of Milan, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
  • 11Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Charité Campus Virchow, Department of Gastroenterology, Berlin, Germany
  • 12Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 December 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Correction to:

Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international expertsEndoscopy 2007; 39(10): 895-909
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966930

K. Mergener, T. Ponchon, I. Gralnek et al. Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 895 - 909.

The authors of the abovementioned article have informed us that Dr. Denis Heresbach, Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital Pontchaillou - CHU Rennes, France, should have been named as panel participant in the Preparation and Prokinetics section in the review. He also participated in final consensus statements.