RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995590
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
The impact of experience on polyp detection and sizing accuracy at capsule endoscopy: implications for training from an animal model study
Publikationsverlauf
submitted 29 May 2007
accepted after revision 21 January 2008
Publikationsdatum:
12. März 2008 (online)
Background and study aims: Indications for capsule endoscopy include polyp surveillance in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and potentially colorectal examination and bowel cancer screening. The ability to detect and accurately size polyps associated with these conditions is critical when deciding which patients require further investigation or therapy. Inexperience may affect the ability of capsule endoscopists to perform these skills resulting in sub-optimal patient care. We assessed the performance of volunteers with different levels of endoscopy and capsule endoscopy experience using an animal-based polyp model.
Patients and methods: Thirty-six artificial polyps were sewn onto the luminal surface of porcine small bowel through which a capsule was propelled. Video images generated by the capsule were then shown to five expert capsule endoscopists, seven consultant gastroenterologists, seven trainee gastroenterologists, six endoscopy nurses, six gastrointestinal radiologists, and six nonmedical participants. Polyp detection rates and sizing accuracy were calculated according to each group and compared.
Results: Expert capsule endoscopists had the highest polyp detection rate (91 %) but only noncapsule endoscopy experience was independently correlated with improved polyp detection and sizing accuracy (OR missing polyp - endoscopy experience 1.0, no experience 1.96 [95 % CI 1.29 - 2.97], P = 0.002; ratio of estimated to actual size - endoscopy experience 1.0, no experience 1.43 [95 % CI 1.22 - 1.66], P < 0.001). Both expert capsule endoscopists and experienced endoscopists tended to underestimate polyp size more than novices, particularly for large polyps (OR capsule expert to non-expert: 2.39 vs. 1.0 [95 % CI 1.73 - 3.29], P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Polyp detection rates and sizing accuracy during capsule endoscopy improve with endoscopic experience. However large polyps, which are the most clinically relevant, are least-accurately sized, and capsule endoscopy experts and experienced endoscopists are the most likely to underestimate the size of these polyps. Training to improve performance in these measures for capsule endoscopy novices as well as experts is required.
References
- 1 Brown G, Fraser C, Schofield G. et al . Video capsule endoscopy in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a blinded comparison with barium follow-through for detection of small-bowel polyps. Endoscopy. 2006; 38 385-390
- 2 Parsi M, Burke C. Utility of capsule endoscopy in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gastrointest Endos Clin N Am. 2004; 14 159-167
- 3 Mata A, Llach J, Castells A. et al . A prospective trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy and barium contrast series for small-bowel polyposis surveillance in hereditary GI polyposis syndromes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61 721-725
- 4 Caspari R, Falkenhausen M von, Krautmacher C. et al . Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of polyps of the small intestine in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis or with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. Endoscopy. 2004; 36 1054-1059
- 5 Rey J F, Ladas S, Alhassani A. et al . ESGE Guidelines Committee European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Video capsule endoscopy: update to guidelines (May 2006). Endoscopy. 2006; 38 1047-1053
- 6 Schoofs N, Deviere J, Van Gossum A. PillCam Colon Capsule Endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumour diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2006; 38 971-977
- 7 Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek I. et al . Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicentre, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy. 2006; 38 963-970
- 8 Lewis B, Rex D, Lieberman D. Capsule colonoscopy - a Pilot three arm, blinded trial of capsule colonoscopy, virtual colonoscopy and colonoscopy. Abstract ACG. 2006;
- 9 Wong R, Tuteja A, Haslem D. et al . Video capsule endoscopy compared with standard endoscopy for the evaluation of small-bowel polyps in persons with familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64 530-537
- 10 Atkin W, Saunders B P. Surveillance guidance after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gut. 2002; 51 V6-V9
- 11 Graepler F, Wolter M, Vonthein R. et al . Accuracy of size estimation in wireless capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65 AB S1381
- 12 Appleyard M, Fireman Z, Glukhovsky A. et al . A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions. Gastroenterology. 2000; 119 1431-1438
- 13 Soares J, Lopes L, Vilas Boas G. et al . Wireless capsule endoscopy for evaluation of phenotypic expression of small-bowel polyps in patients with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and in symptomatic first-degree relatives. Endoscopy. 2004; 36 1060-1066
- 14 Matsumoto T, Esaki M, Moriyama T. et al . Comparison of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with the double-balloon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyposis. Endoscopy. 2005; 37 827-832
- 15 Rácz I, Jánoki M, Kovács V. Measurement of small-bowel polyp size in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome by using reference granules during video capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2007; 39 E41
A. Postgate, MD
Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy
St Mark’s Hospital
Imperial College London
London
HA1 3UJ
UK
Fax: +44-208-4233588
eMail: apostgate@yahoo.com