Pouchanlage und andere Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung der Kontinenz nach tiefer anteriorer Rektumresektion mit TME

Zusammenfassung

75-95 % der Rektumkarzinome können ohne Einbuße an onkologischer Qualität sphinktererhaltend operiert werden. Allerdings treten bei etwa 50 % der Patienten nach subtotaler oder totaler Rektumresektion Kontinenzstörungen auf, auch als anteriores Resektionssyndrom bezeichnet, wenn die Kontinuität mit einer direkten kolorektalen oder koloanalen Anastomose wiederhergestellt wird. Gegenüber der direkten Anastomose verbessert der Kolonpouch durch seine Reservoirfunktion die Kontinenz. Die Verbesserung verschiedener Kontinenzparameter ist evidenzbasiert, sodass der Kolonpouch nach tiefer anteriorer Resektion mit totaler mesorektaler Exzision regelhaft angelegt werden sollte. Hinsichtlich der Funktion und der Komplikationsrate sind der Kolon-J-Pouch, das am besten untersuchte Verfahren, und die Koloplastie gleichwertige Alternativen. Dabei hat sich eine Länge des J-Pouches von 5-6 cm als funktionell am günstigsten erwiesen. Die Seit-zu-End-Anastomose scheint nach den vorliegenden Daten jedoch gleichwertig zu sein. Der Ileozökalpouch ist dagegen wegen des hohen operativen Aufwandes und der schlechteren Funktion nur ein Ausweichverfahren. Der temporäre Verlust des rektoinhibitorischen Reflexes sowie Funktionsstörungen des Sphinkters durch das Dehnungstrauma und durch Verletzungen der autonomen Nerven tragen ebenfalls zum anterioren Resektionssyndrom bei. Die intersphinktere Resektion aggraviert das Syndrom durch den Verlust der Transitionalzone, des Hämorrhoidalplexus und des kranialen Teils des internen Sphinkters. Neben der Pouchanlage kann die Kontinenz mit zwei operationstechnischen Maßnahmen verbessert werden: Das Dehnungstrauma kann bei der Anlage des Kolon-J-Pouches durch die inverse Double-stapling-Technik vermieden werden. Die Darstellung der autonomen Nerven verhindert ihre Läsion und damit eine weitere Funktionsstörung des internen Sphinkters.

Abstract

In 75 to 90 % of patients with rectal cancer, a sphincter-preserving resection can be performed without violating oncological principles. However, almost 50 % of the patients suffer from an anterior resection syndrome after total or subtotal rectal resection with a straight colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. This syndrome describes the characteristic complaints of minor or major incontinence. The anastomosis with the colonic pouch has been proved to result in better continence in the short- and long-terms compared to the straight anastomosis. Based on grade 1 evidence, the colonic pouch should be recommended as a standard procedure after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). Both the colonic J pouch of 6-cm length and the coloplasty have been shown to be of equal value in respect to function and morbidity. With regard to the complicated procedure and the poorer functional outcome, the ileocecal pouch should only be applied in cases without the option of an alternative pouch design. The temporary loss of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, the sphincter lesion caused by the instrumental dilatation in stapling or peranal hand-sutured anastomosis and the disturbed function of the internal sphincter due to the autonomous nerve damage additionally contribute to the anterior resection syndrome. In the intersphincteric resection, the loss of the transitional zone and the hemorrhoidal cushion as well as the removal of the upper part of the internal sphincter aggravate the incontinence. For better continence, two operative procedures should be recommended: By applying the inverse double stapling technique in anastomizing the colonic J pouch, the sphincter lesion as a consequence of the dilatation can be avoided. The nerve-sparing mesorectal excision helps to preserve the function of the internal sphincter.

Rektumkarzinom - anteriores Resektionssyndrom - Kolonpouch

rectal cancer - anterior resection syndrome - colon pouch

Literatur

• 1 Amin A I, Hallböök O, Lee A J, Sexton R, Moran B J, Heald R J. A 5 cm J pouch coloanal reconstruction following anterior resection for low rectal cancer results in acceptable evacuation and continence in the long term.  Colorectal Dis. 2003;  5 33-37
• 2 Araki Y, Isomoto H, Tsuzi J, Matsumoto A, Yasunaga M, Yamauchi K, Hayashi K, Kodama T. Functional results of colonic j-pouch anastomosis for rectal cancer.  Surg Today. 1999;  29 597-600
• 3 Barrier A, Martel P, Gallot D, Dugue L, Sezeur A, Malfosse M. Long-term functional results of colonic j pouch versus straight coloanal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1999;  86 1179-1186
• 4 Batagnani G, Monaci I, Ficari F, Tonelli F. What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 329-335
• 5 Berger A, Tiret E, Parc R, Frileux P, Hannoun L, Nordlinger B, Ratelle R, Simon R. Excision of the rectum with colonic j pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and midrectum.  World J Surg. 1992;  16 470-477
• 6 Bernoist S, Panis Y, Boleslawski E, Hautefeuille P, Valleur P. Functional outcome after coloanal versus low colorectal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma.  J Am Coll Surg. 1997;  185 114-119
• 7 Bittdorf B, Stadelmeier U, Gohl J, Hohenberger W, Matzel K E. Functional outcome after intersphincteric resection of the rectum with coloanal anastomosis in low rectal cancer.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;  30 260-265
• 8 Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Gontier R, Saric J. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 832-838
• 9 Carlstedt A, Nordgren S, Fasth S, Appelgren L, Hulten L. Sympathetic nervous influence on the internal anal sphincter and rectum in man.  Int Colorectal Dis. 1988;  3 90-95
• 10 Dehni N, Schlegel D, Tiret E, Singland J D, Giguet M, Parc R. Effects of aging on the functional outcome of coloanal anastomosis with colonic j-pouch.  Am J Surg. 1998;  175 209-212
• 11 van Duijvendijk P, Slors F, Taat C, Heisterkamp S H, Obertop H, Boeckxstaens G EE. A prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision in patients with a rectal carcinoma.  Surgery. 2003;  133 56-65
• 12 Eigler F W, Gross E. Kontinenzleistung nach totaler und subtotaler Rektumresektion mit peranaler Anastomosierung. In: Häring R (Hrsg). Postoperative Folgezustände. Überreuter, Wien 1988; 399
• 13 Enker W E, Stearns M W, Janov A J. Peranal coloanal anastomosis following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 576-581
• 14 Farouk R, Duthie G S, Lee P W, Monson J R. Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow up.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 888-891
• 15 Flühe M O v. d., Degen L P, Beglinger C, Hellwig A C, Rothenbühler J M, Harder F H. Ileocecal reconstruction with physiologic function after total mesorectal cancer excision.  Ann Surg. 1996;  224 204-212
• 16 Frenckner B, Euler C von. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters.  Gut. 1975;  16 482-489
• 17 Fürst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel J, Jauch K W. Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic j-pouch: the volume of a short colonic j-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 660-667
• 18 Fürst A, Suttner S, Ayman A, Beham A, Jauch K W. Colonic j-pouch vs coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1161-1166
• 19 Götzinger P, Wamser P, Herbst F. Coloanale Anastomose: Verbesserung der funktionellen Frühergebnisse durch Rekonstruktion mit Colonpouch.  Chirurg. 2001;  72 49-53
• 20 Gosselink M P, West R L, Kuipers E J, Hansen B E, Schouten W R. Integrity of the anal sphincters after pouch-anal anastomosis: evaluation with the three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1728-1735
• 21 Gross E, Beersiek F, Eigler F W. Sphinkterfunktion nach peranalen Anastomosen.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1980;  353 207-216
• 22 Gross E, Amir-Kabirian H. Koloanaler Pouch nach totaler Rektumresektion.  Zentralbl Chir. 1994;  119 878-885
• 23 Hallböök O, Pahlmann L, Krog M, Wexner S, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic j-pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection.  Ann Surg. 1996;  224 58-65
• 24 Hallböök O, Nyström P-O, Sjödahl R. Physiological characteristics of straight and colonic j-pouch anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 332-338
• 25 Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Comparison between the colonic j-pouch-anal anastomosis and healthy rectum: clinical and physiological function.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 1437-1441
• 26 Hallgren T, Fasth S, Delbro D, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hulten L. Possible role of the autonomic nervous system in sphincter impairment after restorative proctocolectomy.  Br J Surg. 1993;  80 631-635
• 27 Harris G JC, Lavery I C, Fazio V W. Function of colonic pouch continues to improve with time.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 1623-1627
• 28 Heah S M, Seow-Chon F, Eu K W, Ho Y H, Tang C L. Prospective randomized trial comparing sigmoid vs descending colonic j-pouch after total rectal excision.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 322-328
• 29 Heriot A G, Tekkis P P, Constantinidis V, Paraskevas P, Nicholls R J, Darzi A, Fazio V. Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anstomosis after anterior resection.  Br J Surg. 2006;  93 19-32
• 30 Hida J, Yatsunomi M, Fujimoto K et al. Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic j-pouch: prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 986-991
• 31 Hida J, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T, Inoue K, Matzuzakib T, Okuno K, Shiozaki H, Yasutomi M. Comparison of long-term functional results of colonic j-pouch and straight anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. A five year follow-up.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 1578-1585
• 32 Hildebrandt U, Zuther T, Lindemann W, Ecker K. Elektromyographische Funktion des coloanalen Pouches. In: Becker, Beyer, Hartel (Hrsg). Chir Forum. Springer, Heidelberg. 1993<: 127-131
• 33 Ho Y H, Tan M, Seow-Cheon F. Prospective randomized trial controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic j pouch anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 978-980
• 34 Ho Y H, Tan M, Leong A, Eu K W, Nyram D, Seow-Cheon F. Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 89-95
• 35 Ho Y H, Seow-Choen F, Tan M. Colonic j-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial.  World J Surg. 2001;  26 876-881
• 36 Ho Y H, Brown S, Heah S M, Tsang C, Seow-Chon F. Comparison of j-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancer: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomostic leak rates.  Ann Surg. 2002;  236 49-55
• 37 Horgan P G, O'Conell P R, Shinkwin C A, Kirwan W O. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function.  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 783-786
• 38 Horgan A F, Molloy R G, Cpulter J, Sheehan M, Kirwan W O. Nerve regeneration across colorectal anastomoses after low anterior resection in a canine model.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993;  8 167-169
• 39 Huber F T, Herter B, Siewert J R. Colonic pouch vs side-to-end anstomosis in low anterior resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 896-902
• 40 Ikeuchi H, Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yamamura T, Utsonomiya J. Functional results after high coloanal anastomosis and “low” coloanal anastomosis with a colonic j-pouch for rectal carcinoma.  Surg Today. 1997;  27 702-705
• 41 Jehle E C, Haehnel T, Starlinger M J, Becker H D. Level of anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior resection for rectal cancer.  Am J Surg. 1995;  169 147-153
• 42 Jiang L-K, Yang S-H, Lin J-K. Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: a prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing long term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic j-pouch.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 2100-2110
• 43 Joo J S, Latulippe J F, Alabaz O, Weiss E G, Nogueras J J, Wexner S D. Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic j-pouch: is functional superiority of colonic j-pouch sustained?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 740-741
• 44 Kakodkar R, Gupta S, Nundy S. Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: functional assessment and factors affecting outcome.  Colorectal Dis. 2006;  8 650-656
• 45 Kanne V, Kim N H, Ulrich B. The transverse coloplasty pouch (TPC) function and subjective judgement in comparison with the surgical more complicated j-pouch.  Zentralbl Chir. 2002;  127 781-785
• 46 Karania N D, Schache D J, Heald R J. Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 114-116
• 47 Kienle P, Stern J, Herfarth C. Restaurative Proktektomie. Vergleich direkter coloanaler und colonpouchanaler Anastomosen zur Kontinuitätswiederherstellung.  Chirurg. 1997;  68 630-632
• 48 Köhler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, Psarakis E. Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 843-850
• 49 Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, Hatada T, Fujita S, Sakanoue T, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J. Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 1434-1438
• 50 Lane R H, Parks A G. Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1977;  64 596-599
• 51 Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P et al. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 136-138
• 52 Lazorthes F, Gamagami R, Chiotasso P et al. Prospective radomized study comparing clicical results between small and large colonic j-pouch following coloanal anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 1409-1413
• 53 Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami R A, Istvan G, Chevreau P. Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic j-pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 1449-1451
• 54 Lee S J, Park Y S. Serial evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection of the rectum.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;  13 241-246
• 55 Lestar P, Penninckx F, Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;  4 118-122
• 56 Lewis W G, Holdsworth P J, Stephenson B M, Finan P J, Johnston D. Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 1082-1088
• 57 Lewis W G, Martin I G, Williamson M E et al. Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 259-263
• 58 Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungqvist O. Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.  Ann Surg. 2003;  238 214-220
• 59 Machado M, Nygren J, Goldmann S, Ljungqvist O. Functional and physiologic assessment of the colonic reservoir or side-to-end anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a two year follow up.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 29-36
• 60 Mathyh C R, Hull T L, Fazio V W. Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic j pouch anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 37-42
• 61 Matsuoka H, Maski T, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Large contractions in the colon-j pouch as a possible cause for incomplete evacuation.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;  389 391-395
• 62 Matzel K E, Stadelmeier U, Muehldorfer S, Hohenberger W. Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level of anastomosis.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;  12 82-87
• 63 Matzel K E, Bittdorf B, Günther K, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W. Rectal resection with low anastomosis: functional outcome.  Colorectal Dis. 2003;  5 458-464
• 64 McAnena O J, Heald R J, Lockhart-Mummery H E. Operative and functional results of total rectal excision with ultra-low anterior resection in the management of carcinoma of the lower one third of the rectum.  Surg Gyn Obstet. 1990;  170 517-521
• 65 Miller A S, Lewis W G, Williamson M E et al. Factors that influence functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1327-1330
• 66 Montesani C, Pronio A, Santella S, Boschetto A, Aguzzi D, Pirozzi R, D'Amato A, Vestri A. Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;  51 718-721
• 67 Mortensen N J, Ramirez J M, Takeuchi N, Humphreys M M. Colonic j pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 611-613
• 68 Nesbakken A, Nygard K, Lunde O. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: functional outcome after low anterior resection and colorectal anastomosis without reservoir.  Colorectal Dis. 2002;  4 172-176
• 69 Nicholls R J, Lubowski D Z, Donaldson D R. Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision.  Br J Surg. 1988;  75 318-320
• 70 O'Riordan M G, Molloy R G, Gillen P, Horgan A, Kirwan W O. Rectoanal reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 874-878
• 71 Ortiz H, De Miguel M, Armendariz P, Rodriguez J, Chocarro C. Coloanal anstomosis: Are functional results better with a pouch?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 375-377
• 72 Oya M, Komatsu J, Tkase Y, Nakamura T, Ishikawa H. Comparison of defaecatory function after colonic-j pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis for stapled low anterior resection: results of a prospective randomized trial.  Surg Today. 2002;  32 104-110
• 73 Pappalardo G, Toccaceli S, Dionisio P, Castrinis G, Ravo B. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation by manometric study of the anal sphincter after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 119-122
• 74 Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P et al. Resection and coloanal anstomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 139-141
• 75 Parks A G, Pecy J P. Rectal carcinoma; restorative resection using a sutured colo-anal anastomosis.  Int Surg. 1983;  68 7-11
• 76 Pedersen I K, Hint K, Olsen J, Christiansen J, Jensen P, Mortensen P E. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma.  Ann Surg. 1986;  204 133-135
• 77 Pelissier E P, Blum D, Bachour A, Bosset J F. Functional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 843-846
• 78 Pimentel J M, Duarte A, Gregorio C, Souto P, Patricio J. Transverse coloplasty pouch and colonic j-pouch for rectal cancer - a comparative study.  Colorectal Dis. 2003;  5 465-470
• 79 Ramirez J M, Mortensen N J, Takeuchi N, Humphreys S. Colonic j pouch reconstruction - is it really a neorectum?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1286-1288
• 80 Rasmussen O O, Petersen I K, Christiansen J. Anorectal function following low anterior resection.  Colorectal Dis. 2003;  5 258-261
• 81 Remzi F H, Fazio V W, Gorgun E, Zutsi M, Church J M, Lavery I C, Hull T L. Quality of life, functional outcome, and complications of coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 735-743
• 82 Rink A D, Haaf F, Knupper N, Vestweber K H. Prospective randomized trial comparing ileocaecal interposition and colon-j-pouch as rectal replacement after total mesorectal excision.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;  22 153-160
• 83 Romanos J, Stebbing J F, Humphreys M M et al. Ambulatory manometric examination in patients with colonic j-pouch and in normal controls.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 1744-1746
• 84 Saigusa N, Belin B M, Choi H J, Efron J E, Weiss E G, Nogueras J J, Wexner S D. Recovery of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy: does it correlate with nocturnal continence?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 168-172
• 85 Sailer M, Debus E S, Fuchs K H, Beyerlein J, Thiede A. Comparison of anastomostic microcirculation in coloanal J-pouches versus straight and side to end coloanal reconstruction: an experimental study in the pig.  Int Colorectal Dis. 2000;  15 114-117
• 86 Sailer M, Fuchs K H, Fein M, Thiede A. Randomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 1108-1117
• 87 Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumors.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 1376-1378
• 88 Seow-Choen F, Goh H S. Prospectve randomized trial comparing pouch anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 608-610
• 89 Stelzner F, Biersack H, Mallek D von. Unteres, kloakogenes Rektumviertel. Anatomie und chirurgische Bedeutung für Mastdarmvorfall, Inkontinenz, Rektozele und Radikaloperation beim Rektumkarzinom.  Chirurg. 2006;  77 273-280
• 90 Sun W M, Read N W, Katsinelos P, Donelly T C, Shorthaus A J. Anorectal function after restorative proctocolectomy and low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 280-284
• 91 Suzuki H, Matsumoto K, Amano S, Fujioka M, Honzumi M. Anorectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resection.  Br J Surg. 1980;  67 655-657
• 92 Temple L K, Bacik J, Savatta S G, Gottesman L, Paty P B, Weiser M R, Guillem J G, Minsky B D, Kalman M, Thaler H T, Schrag D, Wong W D. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1353-1365
• 93 Vassilakis J S, Pechlivanides G, Vrachasotakis N, Chrysos E, Tzovaras G, Xynos E. Anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993;  10 101-106
• 94 Wang J W, You Y T, Chen H H, Chiang J M, Yeh C Y, Tang R. Stapled colonic j-pouch anal anastomosis without diverting colostomy for rectal carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 30-34
• 95 Williamson M E, Lewis W G, Finan P J, Miller A S, Holdsworth P J, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 411-418
• 96 Willis S, Kasperk R, Braun J, Schumpelick V. Comparison of colonic j-pouch reconstruction and straight coloanal anastomosis after intersphincteric rectal resection.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;  386 193-199
• 97 Wunderlich M, Teleki B, Schiessel R. Sphincter function following colo-anal anastomosis.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1986;  367 259-269
• 98 Z'graggen K, Maurer C A, Birrer S, Giachino D, Kern B, Büchler M W. A new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection: the transverse coloplasty pouch.  Ann Surg. 2001;  234 780-787