Literatur
-
1
Arnesen R B, Ginnerup-Pedersen B, Poulsen P B. et al .
Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography: a prospective comparison with colonoscopy.
Acta Radiol.
2007;
48
259-266
-
2
Aschoff A J, Ernst A S, Brambs H J. et al .
CT colonography: an update.
Eur Radiol.
2008;
18
429-437
-
3
Barish M A, Soto J A, Ferrucci J T.
Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy.
AJR.
2005;
184
786-792
-
4
Beaulieu C F, Napel S, Daniel B L. et al .
Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition.
JCAT.
1998;
22
656-663
-
5
Burling D, Halligan S, Altman D G. et al .
CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
16
1745-1749
-
6
Burling D, Halligan S, Altman D G. et al .
Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
16
1737-1744
-
7
Chen S C, Lu D S, Hecht J R. et al .
CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.
AJR.
1999;
172
595-599
-
8
Cotton P, Durkalski V, Pineau B. et al .
Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.
JAMA.
2004;
291
1713-1719
-
9
Edwards J T, Wood C J, Mendelson R M. et al .
Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2001;
96
3009-3012
-
10
Fenlon H M, Nunes D P, Schroy P C. et al .
A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.
N Engl J Med.
1999;
341
1496-1503
-
11
Forbes G M, Edwards J T, Mendelson R M.
CT colonography versus colonoscopy: comparing apples and oranges?.
Radiology.
2002;
225
308-discussion 308 - 309
-
12
Halligan S.
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.
Clin Radiol.
2005;
60
977-979
-
13
Hara A K, Johnson C D, MacCarty R L. et al .
Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography.
Radiology.
2000;
215
353-357
-
14
Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C. et al .
Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps.
Gastroenterology.
2004;
127
1300-1311
-
15
Jensch S, Vries A H, Peringa de J. et al .
CT Colonography with Limited Bowel Preparation: Performance Characteristics in an Increased-Risk Population.
Radiology.
2008 electronic publication;
-
16
Johnson C D, Hara A K, Reed J E.
Virtual endoscopy: what’s in a name?.
AJR.
1998;
171
1201-1202
-
17
Juchems M S, Hoffmann M H, Schmidt S A. et al .
Bowel preparation for CT-colonography: comparison of two different cleansing protocols.
Eur J Radiol.
2006;
60
460-464
-
18
Kim D H, Pickhardt P J, Taylor A J. et al .
CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.
N Engl J Med.
2007;
357
1403-1412
-
19
Kim S Y, Park S H, Choi E K. et al .
Automated carbon dioxide insufflation for CT colonography: effectiveness of colonic distention in cancer patients with severe luminal narrowing.
AJR.
2008;
190
698-706
-
20
Konukoglu E, Acar B, Paik D S. et al .
Polyp enhancing level set evolution of colon wall: method and pilot study.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging.
2007;
26
1649-1656
-
21
Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Mangiapane F. et al .
Experimental colonic phantom for the evaluation of the optimal scanning technique for CT colonography using a multidetector spiral CT equipment.
Eur Radiol.
2003;
13
459-466
-
22
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J. et al .
CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.
AJR.
2005;
184
1836-1842
-
23
Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M. et al .
Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.
AJR.
2000;
174
1543-1549
-
24
Mani A, Napel S, Paik D S. et al .
Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a „first reader” paradigm.
JCAT.
2004;
28
318-326
-
25
McFarland E G, Pilgram T K, Brink J A. et al .
CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.
Radiology.
2002;
225
380-390
-
26
Morrin M M, Raptopoulos V.
Contrast-Enhanced CT colonography.
Semin Ultrasound CT MR.
2001;
22
420-424
-
27
Mulhall B P, Veerappan G R, Jackson J L.
Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography.
Ann Intern Med.
2005;
142
635-650
-
28
Paik D S, Beaulieu C F, Jeffrey R B. et al .
Automated flight path planning for virtual endoscopy.
Med Phys.
1998;
25
629-637
-
29
Parkins T.
Computer lets doctor fly through the virtual colon.
JNCI.
1994;
86
1046-1047
-
30
Pickhardt P J, Hassan C, Laghi A. et al .
Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.
AJR.
2008;
190
136-144
-
31
Pickhardt P J, Kim D H, Taylor A J.
Asymptomatic pneumatosis at CT colonography: a benign self-limited imaging finding distinct from perforation.
AJR.
2008;
190
112-117
-
32
Pickhardt P J, Lee A D, Taylor A J. et al .
Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
AJR.
2007;
189
1451-1456
-
33
Pickhardt P J, Nugent P A, Choi J R. et al .
Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy.
AJR.
2004;
183
1343-1347
-
34
Pickhardt P J.
Missed lesions at primary 2D CT colonography: further support for 3D polyp detection.
Radiology.
2008;
246
648
-
35
Rex D K, Imperiale T F.
CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.
N Engl J Med.
2008;
358
88-author reply 90
-
36
Rockey D, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D. et al .
Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.
Lancet.
2005;
365
305-311
-
37
Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Rückert J. et al .
Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon.
Radiology.
2005;
236
184-188
-
38
Rogalla P, Meiri N, Rückert J C. et al .
Colonography using multislice CT.
Eur J Radiol.
2000;
36
81-85
-
39
Rother T, Knopfle E, Bohndorf K.
Virtuelle Koloskopie - Und was dann? Zur Relevanz kleiner kolorektaler Polypen.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2007;
179
130-136
-
40
Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M. et al .
Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort.
Radiology.
2006;
239
457-463
-
41
Sosna J, Morrin M M, Kruskal J B. et al .
CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.
AJR.
2003;
181
1593-1598
-
42
Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O. et al .
Critical analysis of the performance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps>or= 6 mm in the era of CT colonography.
AJR.
2008;
190
374-385
-
43
Taylor S A, Laghi A, Lefere P. et al .
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.
Eur Radiol.
2007;
17
575-579
-
44
Tolan D J, Armstrong E M, Chapman A H.
Replacing barium enema with CT colonography in patients older than 70 years: the importance of detecting extracolonic abnormalities.
AJR.
2007;
189
1104-1111
-
45
Zalis M E, Barish M A, Choi J R. et al .
CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal.
Radiology.
2005;
236
3-9
Patrik Rogalla
Institut für Radiologie, Campus Charité Mitte
Charitéplatz 1
10117 Berlin
Phone: ++ 49/30/4 50/52 71 37
Fax: ++ 49/30/4 50/52 79 11
Email: patrik.rogalla@charite.de