RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027616
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Transgastral Retroperitoneal Endoscopy in Septic Patients with Pancreatic Necrosis or Infected Pancreatic Pseudocysts
Transgastrale retroperitoneale Endoskopie bei septischen Patienten aufgrund einer Pankreasnekrose bzw. infizierten pankreatischen PseudozystePublikationsverlauf
manuscript received: 19.3.2008
manuscript accepted: 9.6.2008
Publikationsdatum:
03. Dezember 2008 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Einführung: Peripankreatische Flüssigkeitsansammlungen sind eine bekannte Komplikation einer akuten Pankreatitis bzw. einer akuten Exazerbation einer chronischen Pankreatitis. Der Sinn der Studie war es, die Machbarkeit und Komplikationsrate der sich neu entwickelnden endoskopischen Methoden mit einem standardisierten endoskopischen Vorgehen zu überprüfen. Material und Methode: Von 2000 – 2006 wurden insgesamt 30 Patienten (Alter 57 ± 10 Jahre, Spanne: 34 – 74 Jahre) mit infizierten pankreatischen Pseudozysten bzw. infizierter Pankreasnekrose in die Studie eingeschlossen. Die transgastrische Drainage wurde mithilfe eines Endosonografiegeräts (Pentax 38 UX, Olympus UCT 140) mit Einführung eines 8 Fr-Doppelpigtailstents in die Höhle durchgeführt. Unmittelbar nach der Stentanlage erfolgte eine Ballondilatation des Zugangswegs auf 12 mm und nachfolgend die direkte Spiegelung der retroperitonealen Höhle mit einem normalen Gastroskop. Unter Sicht wurde die Flüssigkeit in der Höhle aspiriert, Nekrosen entfernt und die Höhle gespült. Nach abgeschlossener endoskopischer Behandlung erfolgte die Entfernung der liegenden Prothese nach 4 Wochen. Ergebnis: Der technische Erfolg stellt sich in 96,7 % der Fälle ein. Ein Langzeiterfolg war in 83,4 % der Fälle zu beobachten. Im Mittel erfolgten bis zur vollständigen Reinigung der Höhle 2,7 Prozeduren (1 – 16). Relevante Komplikationen wurden in 10 % der Fälle beobachtet (Blutung, Perforation, Fistelbildung). In 10 % war eine sekundäre Operation erforderlich. Die Mortalitätsrate betrug 6,6 %. Diskussion: Die endoskopische Therapie der infizierten Pseudozyste und der infizierten postakuten Pankreasnekrose mithilfe von endoskopischen Techniken stellt ein minimalinvasives und effektives Verfahren bei der Behandlung der akuten bzw. chronischen Pankreatitis dar.
Abstract
Objective: Peripancreatic fluid collections are common complications of acute pancreatitis or acute exacerbations of chronic pancreatitis. Surgery is required when these fluid collections become infected or cause obstruction or pain. However, morbidity and mortality after surgery in these cases are still too high, therefore minimally invasive approaches have been encouraged. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage with intracystic endoscopy and necrosectomy. Material and Methods: From 2000 to 2006 30 patients (age: 57 ± 10 years, range: 34 – 74 years) with an infected pancreatic pseudocyst or infected pancreatic necrosis were included in the study. The diagnosis of infection in patients who had fever despite an adequate antibiotic regime was confirmed by endoscopic fine needle aspiration with a positive bacterial or mycological result. The mean C-reactive protein value before treatment was 202 ± 58 mg/L and the mean leukocyte count was 13.25 ± 4.75 GPt/L. Transgastric cyst drainage was performed using a therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound probe (Pentax 38 UX or Olympus GF UCT 140) with insertion of an 8-Fr double pigtail prosthesis. After balloon dilatation (12 mm) a normal gastroscope was inserted into the cavity and all the fluid and easy removable necrosis were removed. The prosthesis was removed 4 weeks after the end of the endoscopic treatment. Clinical and ultrasound follow-up were carried out 3 and 6 months after removal of the prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 60 weeks. Results: The technical success of the procedure was 96.7 %, the long-term success was 83.4 %. On average 2.7 (range: 1 – 16) procedures were necessary for complete removal of necrosis and the remaining fluid. Major complications (bleeding, perforation, fistulation) occurred in 10 %. In 10 % a secondary operation was necessary. The overall mortality rate was 6.6 %. Discussion: Endoscopic treatment of infected pseudocysts and infected postacute pancreatic necrosis using transgastral retroperitoneal endoscopy with fluid and necrosis removal is a minimally invasive and effective procedure in patients with acute pancreatitis or acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis. However, the mortality rate of 6.6 % has to be taken into account.
Schlüsselwörter
endoskopische Drainage - infizierte pankreatische Pseudozyste - endoskopische Sonografie - Zystogastrostomie - Pankreasnekrose
Key words
endoscopic drainage - infected pancreatic pseudocyst - endoscopic ultrasound - cystogastrostomy - pancreatic necrosis
References
- 1
Bahari H M, Abdullah I.
Endoscopic transgastric drainage of pseudopancreatic cyst.
Med J Malaysia.
1982;
37
316-317
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Grimm H, Binmoeller K F, Soehendra N.
Endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1992;
38
170-171
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Vilmann P, Hancke S, Pless T. et al .
One-step endosonography guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst: a new technique
of stent delivery through the echo endoscope.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
730-733
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Giovannini M, Bernardini D, Seitz J F.
Cystogastrostomy entirely performed under endosonography guidance for pancreatic pseudocyst:
results in six patients.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1998;
48
200-203
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Seifert H, Wehrmann T, Schmitt T. et al .
Retroperitoneal endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis.
Lancet.
2000;
19
653-655
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Vosoghi M, Sial S, Garrett B. et al .
EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: review and experience at Harbor-UCLA Medical
Center.
MedGenMed.
2002;
4
2
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Navicharern P, Wesarachawit W, Sriussadaporn S. et al .
Management and outcome of severe acute pancreatitis.
J med assoc Thai.
2006;
89 (Suppl 3)
S25-S32
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Mofidi R, Lee A C, Madhavan K K. et al .
Prognostic factors in patients undergoing surgery for severe necrotizing pancreatitis.
World J Surg.
2007;
31
2002-2007
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Will U, Wegener C, Graf K I. et al .
Differential treatment and early outcome in the interventional endoscopic management
of pancreatic pseudocysts in 27 patients.
World J Gastroenterol.
2006;
12
4175-4178
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Raczynski S, Teich N, Borte G. et al .
Percutaneous transgastric irrigation drainage in combination with endoscopic necrosectomy
in necrotizing pancreatitis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
420-424
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Bradley 3rd E L.
A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis.
Arch Surg.
1993;
128
586-590
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Will U, Meyer F, Hartmeier S. et al .
Endoscopic treatment of a pseudocystocolobic fistula by band ligation and endoloop
application: case report.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
59
581-583
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Besselink M G, De Bruijn M T, Rutten J P. et al .
Surgical intervention in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.
Br J Surg.
2006;
93
593-599
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Chang Y C, Tsai H M, Lin X Z. et al .
No debridement is necessary for symptomatic or infected acute necrotizing pancreattiis:
delayed, mini-retroperitoneal drainage for acute necrotizing pancreatitis without
depridement and irrigation.
Dig Dis Sci.
2006;
51
1388-1395
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Ahlawat S K, Charabaty-Pishvaian A, Jackson P G. et al .
Single-step EUS guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage using a large channel linear
array echoendoscope and cystotome: results in 11 patients.
JOP.
2006;
7
616-624
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Azar R R, Oh Y S, Janec E M. et al .
Wire-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage by using a modified needle knife and therapeutic
echoendoscope.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63 (4)
688-692
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Krüger M, Schneider A S, Manns M P. et al .
Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts or abscesses after an EUS-guided 1-step
procedure for initial access.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
409-416
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Seewald S, Thonke F, Ang T L. et al .
One-step simultaneous double-wire technique facilitates pancreatic pseudocyst and
abscess drainage.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
805-808
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Rout S, Rahman S H, Sheridan M B. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound guided transgastric stentin of traumatic pancreatic pseudocyst.
JOP.
2006;
7
423-426
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Kahaleh M, Shami V M, Conaway M R. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic peseuodcyst: a prospective comparision
with conventional endoscopic drainage.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
355-359
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Hookey L C, Debroux S, Delhaye M. et al .
Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison
of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
635-643
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S. et al .
Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new
safe and effective treatment algorithm.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
92-100
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Charnley R M, Lochan R, Gray H. et al .
Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic
necrosis.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
925-928
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Raczynski S, Teich N, Borte G. et al .
Percutaneous transgastric irrigation drainage in combination with endoscopic necrosectomy
in necrotizing pancreatitis.
Gastrointest Endsoc.
2006;
64 (3)
420-424
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Yusuf T E, Baron T H.
Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: results of a national and
an international survey of ASGE members.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
223-227
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Traverso L W, Kozarek R A.
Pancreatic necrosectomy: definitions and technique.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2005;
9
436-439
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Besselink M G, Santvoort van H C, Nieuwenhuijs V B. et al .
Minimally invasive “step up approach” versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with
acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised
controlled multicenter trial.
BMC Surg.
2006;
6
6
MissingFormLabel
Dr. Michael Hocke
Internal Medicine II, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena
Erlanger Allee 101
07740 Jena
Germany
eMail: Michael.hocke@med.uni-jena.de