Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19(2): 130-131
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038442
Case Gallery

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Management of Button Battery Stricture in 22-Day-Old Neonate

E. H. Raboei1 , S. S. Syed1 , M. Maghrabi2 , S. El Beely2
  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, King Khalid National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 February 2009 (online)

Case Report

A 22-day-old baby girl was admitted to the Emergency Department 18 hours after her 2-year-old aunt pushed a button battery (BB) with a diameter of 12 mm and a thickness of 5 mm into her mouth when the mother was not around (child neglect). There was no history of cough, choking or cyanosis. Clinical examination showed a 3.5-kg baby who was maintaining normal O2 saturation in room air and had stable vital signs. Examination of all systems was normal. Based on the mother's suspicion, as the battery was missing from a toy, a chest X‐ray was done and showed the BB at the level of T1/T2 ([Fig. 1]).

Fig. 1 X-ray showing button battery at the level of T1/T2.

The patient was admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), but an attempted removal of the battery by flexible endoscopy performed by a gastroenterologist failed. A circumferential burn was seen and the BB was ultimately removed by rigid endoscopy aided by the use of a Foley catheter. Evidence of a small concealed perforation in the esophageal wall was treated conservatively. No tracheoesophageal fistula was noticed on follow-up. Oral intake was started after 7 days following the esophagogram. As the patient tolerated full oral intake well, she was discharged home on ranitidine to be seen in the clinic two weeks later. She missed the appointment, reported to emergency department with dysphagia ([Fig. 2]).

Fig. 2 Nonionic esophagogram showed marked stenosis 1 to 2 mm in width and extending along 2 to 3 mm length resulting in marked dilatation of the proximal esophagus.

Esophagosopy, esophageal dilatation and laparoscopic gastrostomy were done. Frequent programmed elective dilatation with a Savary bougie [4] was started under general anesthesia, every 2 weeks in the first 3 months, every three weeks in the following six months and monthly for the last 3 months. Follow-up showed radiological ([Fig. 3]) and clinical improvement. At the age of 18 months, she tolerates full oral feeds and weighs 12 kg.

Fig. 3  Follow-up nonionic esophagogram showed normal esophageal structure.

References

  • 1 Alkan M, Buyukyavuz I, Dogru D. et al . Tracheoesophageal fistula due to disc-battery ingestion.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004;  14 274-278
  • 2 Banerjee R, Rao G V, Sriram P VJ. et al . Button battery ingestion.  Indian J Pediatr. 2005;  72 173-174
  • 3 Chan Y L, Chang S S, Kao K L. et al . Button battery ingestion: an analysis of 25 cases.  Chang Gung Med J. 2002;  25 169-174
  • 4 De la Rionda L M, Fragoso T, Sagaro E. et al . Treatment with Savary-Gilliard bougies in esophageal stenosis in children.  Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1995;  15 152-157
  • 5 El Barghouty N. Management of disc battery ingestion in children.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 247
  • 6 Hachimi I, Corne L, Vanderplas Y. Management of ingested foreign bodies in childhood: our experience and review of the literature.  Eur J Emerg Med. 1998;  5 319-323
  • 7 Jaffe R B, Cornell H M. Fluoroscopic removal of ingested alkaline batteries.  Radiology. 1984;  150 585-586
  • 8 Litovitz T L. Battery ingestions: product accessibility and clinical course.  Pediatrics. 1985;  75 469-476
  • 9 Litovitz T, Schmitz B F. Ingestion of cylindrical and button batteries: an analysis of 2382 cases.  Pediatrics. 1992;  89 747-757
  • 10 Maves M D, Carithers J S, Birck H G. Esophageal burns secondary to disc battery ingestion.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1984;  93 364-369
  • 11 Mutaf O. Treatment of corrosive esophageal strictures by long-term stenting.  J Pediatr Surg. 1996;  31 681-685
  • 12 Mutaf O, Genc A, Herek O. et al . Gastroesophageal reflux: a determinant in the outcome of caustic esophageal burns.  J Pediatr Surg. 1996;  31 1494-1495
  • 13 Ozcan Z, Ozcan C, Erinc R. et al . Scintigraphy in the detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children with caustic oesophageal burns: a comparative study with radiography and 24-h pH monitoring.  Pediatr Radiol. 2001;  31 737-741
  • 14 Rumack B H, Rumack C M. Disc battery ingestion.  JAMA. 1983;  249 2509-2511
  • 15 Shabino C L, Feinberg A N. Esophageal perforation secondary to alkaline battery ingestion.  JACEP. 1979;  8 360-363
  • 16 Vaishnav A, Spitz L. Alkaline battery induced tracheoesophageal fistula.  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 1045
  • 17 Votteler T P, Nash J C, Rutledge J C. The hazard of ingested alkaline disc batteries in children.  JAMA. 1983;  249 2504-2506
  • 18 Yardeni D, Yardeni H, Coran A. et al . Severe esophageal damage due to button battery ingestion: can it be prevented?.  Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;  20 496-501

Dr. Enaam H. Raboei

Department of Pediatric Surgery
King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital

P. O. Box 9862

21159 Jeddah

Saudi Arabia

Email: enaamraboei@yahoo.fr