Epicardial versus Transvenous Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study

Abstract

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the differences in left ventricular (LV) lead positioning for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): comparing a percutaneous transvenous approach via the coronary sinus versus epimyocardial placement via a left lateral mini-thoracotomy. Methods: Eighty consecutive patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction and an indication for CRT were randomized to receive either a transvenous (n = 40) or epicardial (n = 40) LV-lead placement. Postoperative follow-up included assessment of NYHA functional class, ECG and echocardiography. Results: The transvenous group had a shorter ICU stay (0.66 vs. 3.8 days) and shorter ventilation times (0.34 vs. 3.2 h). The epicardial group had less exposure to radiation (7.4 vs. 23 min) and required less use of contrast medium (3.24 vs. 61 ml). At 6 months follow-up, no major differences in LV-lead parameters (threshold, sensing, and impedance) were observed. Conclusion: Both epicardial and transvenous LV-lead placement for CRT therapy are safe and effective. The transvenous approach is less invasive and should be considered the standard procedure for patients without renal insufficiency. However, in a case of difficult coronary venous anatomy with the inability to position the lead as desired, epicardial LV-lead placement remains an alternative option.

Key words

cardiomyopathy - heart disease - thoracic surgery - pacing

References

• 1 Moss A J, Zareba W, Hall J. et al . Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.  N Engl Med. 2002;  346 877-883
• 2 Grines C L, Bashore T M, Boudoulas H, Olson S, Shafer P, Wooley C F. Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony.  Circulation. 1989;  79 845-853
• 3 Xiao H B, Lee C H, Gibson D G. Effect of left bundle branch block on diastolic function in dilated cardiomyopathy.  Br Heart J. 1991;  66 443-447
• 4 Erlebacher J A, Barbarash S. Intraventricular conduction delay and functional mitral regurgitation.  Am J Cardiol. 2001;  88 83-86
• 5 Aaronson K D, Schwartz S, Chen T M, Wong K L, Goin J E, Mancini D M. Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation.  Circulation. 1997;  95 2660-2667
• 6 Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M. et al . Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure.  Am Heart J. 2002;  143 398-405
• 7 Shamim W, Francis D P, Yousufuddin M, Varney S, Pieopli M F, Anker S D, Coats A JS. Intraventricular conduction delay: a prognostic marker in chronic heart failure.  Int J Cardiol. 1999;  70 171-178
• 8 Nelson G S, Berger R D, Fetics B J. et al . Left ventricular or biventricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block.  Circulation. 2000;  102 3053-3059
• 9 Stellbrink C, Auricchio A, Lemke B. et al . Positionspapier zur kardialen Resynchronisationstherapie.  Z Kardiol. 2003;  92 96-103
• 10 Remme W J, Swedberg K. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure.  Eur Heart J. 2001;  22 1527-1560
• 11 Hunt S A, Baker D W, Chin M H. et al . ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure).  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;  38 2101-2113
• 12 Daubert J C, Ritter P, Le Breton H. et al . Permanent left ventricular pacing with transvenous leads inserted into the coronary veins.  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;  21(1 Pt 2) 239-245
• 13 Bakker P F, Meijburg H W, de Vries J W. et al . Biventricular pacing in endstage heart failure improves functional capacity and left ventricular function.  J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000;  4 395-404
• 14 Gras D, Mabo P, Tang T. et al . Multisite pacing as a supplemental treatment of congestive heart failure: preliminary results of the Medtronic Inc. In-Sync study.  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;  21 (Part III) 2249-2255
• 15 Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T. et al . Multisite stimulation in cardiomyopathies (MUSTIC) study investigators. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 873-880
• 16 Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack. et al . Chronic effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization. Therapy on patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;  39 2026-2033
• 17 Abraham W T, Fisher W G, Smith A L et al. for the. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  346 1845-1853
• 18 Bristow M R, Feldman A M, Saxon L A. et al . Heart failure management using implantable devices for ventricular resynchronization: comparison of medical therapy, pacing, and defibrillation in chronic heart failure (COMPANION) trial. COMPANION steering committee and COMPANION clinical investigators.  J Card Fail. 2000;  6 276-285
• 19 CIBIS‐II Investigators and Committees . The cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study II (CIBIS‐II): a randomised trial.  Lancet. 1999;  353 9-13
• 20 MERIT‐HF Investigators . Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: metoprolol CR/XL randomised intervention trial in congestive heart failure (MERITHF).  Lancet. 1999;  353 2001-2007
• 21 Valls-Bertault V, Mansourati J, Gilard M, Etienne Y, Munier S, Blanc J J. Adverse events with transvenous left ventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure: early experience from a single centre.  Europace. 2001;  3 60-63
• 22 Cohen M I, Bush D M, Vetter V L, Tanel R E, Wieand T S, Gaynor J W, Rhodes L A. Permanent epicardial pacing in pediatric patients: seventeen years of experience and 1200 outpatient visits.  Circulation. 2001;  103 2585-2590
• 23 Izutani H, Quan K J, Biblo L A. et al . Biventricular pacing for congestive heart failure: early experience in surgical epicardial versus coronary sinus lead placement.  Heart Surg Forum. 2002;  6 E1-E6
• 24 Mair H, Jansens J L, Lattouf O M. et al . Epicardial lead implantation techniques for biventricular pacing via left lateral mini-thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopy and robotic approach.  Heart Surg Forum. 2003;  6 412-417
• 25 Mair H, Schuetz A, Schmoeckel M. et al .Techniques in biventricular pacing: epicardial leads are superior compared to coronary sinus leads in long-term follow-up. Abstract 196 of the 2nd EACTS/ESTS Joint meeting. 12 – 15 Oct. 2003. Vienna, Austria. 
• 26 Breuer M, Franke U, Wahlers T. et al .Surgical mapped positioning of left ventricular pacemaker leads for completion of resynchronization therapy. Abstract 197 of the 2nd EACTS/ESTS Joint meeting. 12 – 15 Oct. 2003. Vienna, Austria. 
• 27 Derose J J, Ashton R C, Belsley S. et al . Robotically assisted left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;  41 1414-1419
• 28 Derose J J, Belsley S, Swistel D G. et al . Robotically assisted left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing. The posterior approach.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  77 1472-1474
• 29 Doll N, Opfermann U T, Rastan A J, Walther T, Bernau H, Gummert J F, Mohr F W. Facilitated minimally invasive left ventricle epicardial lead placement.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;  79 1023-1025 1025