Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19(1): 1-9
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1039190
Review Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Update on Paediatric Faecal Incontinence

M. Levitt1 , A. Peña1
  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Colorectal Center, CCHMC, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Further Information

Publication History

received November 4, 2008

accepted after revision November 7, 2008

Publication Date:
16 February 2009 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: Faecal incontinence represents a devastating problem; it is often a barrier to social acceptance. It can affect many children including those with prior surgery (for anorectal malformations and Hirschsprung's disease) as well as those with spinal problems or injuries. Management involves distinguishing between true and pseudoincontinence, and then determining the proper protocol of treatment. Methods: An extensive review of the authors' series of over 500 patients who presented with soiling was undertaken with the goal of determining helpful algorithms of treatment. Results: Treatment begins first with proper categorisation of patients. Pseudoincontinence (encopresis) can be treated with disimpaction followed by laxative therapy. True incontinence requires an enema programme, with treatment tailored to either hypo or hypermotile colons. Surgery for pseudoincontinence, rarely required, takes the form of colonic resection but only for patients with a demonstrated ability to have voluntary bowel movements, albeit with enormous laxative requirements. Removal of the rectosigmoid in this situation can reduce or eliminate the need for laxatives. Surgery for true faecal incontinence involves changing the route for a successfully demonstrated enema programme to an antegrade, i.e., a Malone appendicostomy. Conclusion: The keys to success in helping a faecally incontinent child are dedication and sensitivity on the part of the medical team. The basis of the bowel management programme is to clean the colon (either with medical treatment for patients with the potential for bowel control, or artificially with enemas for patients with true faecal incontinence), and then keep the colon quiet for 24 hours until the next treatment, thereby ensuring that the patient is clean and no longer soiling. The programme is an ongoing process of trial and error that responds to the individual patient and differs for each child. We carry out this programme over the course of one week with daily abdominal radiographs as we tailor the regimen. More than 95 % of the children who follow this programme are clean and dry. The clinician must embrace the philosophy that it is unacceptable to send a child with faecal incontinence to school in diapers when their classmates are already toilet trained. Proper treatment to prevent this is perhaps more important than any surgical procedure.

References

  • 1 Bax K. Duhamel lecture: the incurability of Hirschsprung's disease.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006;  16 380-384
  • 2 Cascio S, Flett M, De la Hunt M. et al . MACE or cecostomy button for idiopathic constipation in children: a comparison of complications and outcomes.  Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;  20 484-487
  • 3 Cook B, Lim E, Cook D. Radionuclear transit to assess sites of delay in large bowel transit in children with chronic idiopathic constipation.  J Pediatr Surg. 2005;  40 478-483
  • 4 DeLorenzo C, Flores A, Reddy S. et al . Use of colonic manometry to differentiate causes of intractable constipation in children.  J Pediatr. 1992;  120 690-695
  • 5 Gladman M, Scott S, Lunniss P. et al . Systematic review of surgical options for idiopathic megarectum and megacolon.  Ann Surg. 2005;  241 562-574
  • 6 Kiesewetter W. Imperforate anus II. The rationale and technique of the sacroabdominoperineal operation.  J Pediatr Surg. 1967;  2 106
  • 7 King S, Sutcliffe J, Southwell B. et al . The antegrade continence enema successfully treats idiopathic slow-transit constipation.  J Pediatr Surg. 2005;  40 1935-1940
  • 8 Lemelle J, Guillemin F, Aubert D. et al . A multicentre study of the management of disorders of defecation in patients with spina bifida.  Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;  18 123-128
  • 9 Levitt M, Peña A. Reoperations in anorectal malformations. Teich S, Caniano D, eds. Reoperative pediatric surgery. New York; Humana Press 2008: 311-326
  • 10 Levitt M, Peña A. Laparoscopy in the management of fecal incontinence and constipation. Holcomb W, Georgeson K, Rothenberg S, eds. Atlas of pediatric laparoscopy and thoracoscopy. Philadelphia; Elsevier Saunders 2008: 81-90
  • 11 Levitt M, Soffer S, Peña A. Continent appendicostomy in the bowel management fecal incontinent children.  J Pediatr Surg. 1997;  32 1630-1633
  • 12 Levitt M, Mak G, Falcone R. et al . Cloacal exstrophy – pull through or permanent stoma?.  J Pediatr Surg. 2008;  43 164-170
  • 13 Levitt M, Martin C, Olesevich M. et al . Hirschsprung's disease and fecal incontinence: diagnostic and management strategies.  J Pediatr Surg.
  • 14 Levitt M, Martin C, Olesevich M. et al . Hirschsprung's disease and fecal incontinence: diagnostic and management strategies.  J Pediatr Surg.
  • 15 Malone P, Ransley P, Kiely E. Preliminary report: the anterograde continence enema.  Lancet. 1990;  336 1217-1218
  • 16 Marshall J, Hutson J, Anticich N. et al . Antegrade continence enemas in the treatment of slow-transit constipation.  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  36 1227-1230
  • 17 Peña A. Anorectal malformations.  Sem Pediatr Surg. 1995;  4 35-47
  • 18 Peña A, El-Behery M. Megasigmoid – a source of pseudo-incontinence in children with repaired anorectal malformations.  J Pediatr Surg. 1993;  28 1-5
  • 19 Peña A, Levitt M. Colonic inertia disorders.  Curr Probl Surg. 2002;  39 666-730
  • 20 Peña A, Levitt M. Imperforate anus and cloacal malformations. Ashcraft K, Holder T, Holcomb W, eds. Pediatric surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia; W.B. Saunders 2005: 496-517
  • 21 Peña A, Guardino K, Tovilla J. et al . Management for fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations.  J Pediatr Surg. 1998;  33 133-137
  • 22 Rehbein F. Imperforate anus: experiences with abdomino-perineal and abdomin-sacro-perineal pull through procedures.  J Pediatr Surg. 1967;  2 99-105
  • 23 Sarna S, Bardakjian B, Waterfall W. et al . Human colonic electric control activity.  Gastroenterology. 1980;  78 1526-1536
  • 24 Scarpa M, Barollo M, Keighley M. Ileostomy for constipation: long term postoperative outcome.  Colorectal Dis. 2005;  7 224-227
  • 25 Teitelbaum D, Drongowski R, Chamberlain J. et al . Long-term stooling patterns in infants undergoing primary endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease.  J Pediatr Surg. 1997;  32 1049-1052
  • 26 Vande Velde S, Van Biervliet S, Van Renterghem K. et al . Achieving fecal continence in patients with spina bifida: a descriptive cohort study.  J Urol. 2007;  178 2640-2644

Dr. Marc Levitt

Department of Pediatric Surgery
CCHMC

3333 Burnet Ave

Cincinnati, OH 45229

USA

Email: marc.levitt@cchmc.org

    >