References and Notes
1a
Ojima I.
Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis
2nd ed.:
Wiley;
New York:
2000.
1b
Au-Yeung TT.-L.
Chan S.-S.
Chan ASC.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2003,
345:
537
2a
Zeng Q.
Liu H.
Cui X.
Mi A.
Jiang Y.
Li X.
Choi MCK.
Chan ASC.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2002,
13:
115
2b
Li X.
Jia X.
Lu G.
Au-Yeung TT.-L.
Lam K.-H.
Lo TWH.
Chan ASC.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003,
14:
2687
2c
Zeng Q.-H.
Hu X.-P.
Duan Z.-C.
Liang X.-M.
Zheng Z.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2005,
16:
1233
2d
Zeng Q.
Liu H.
Mi A.
Jiang Y.
Li X.
Choi MCK.
Chan ASC.
Tetrahedron
2002,
58:
8799
2e
Chan ASC.
Zhang F.-Y.
Yip C.-W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997,
119:
4080
2f
Zhang F.-Y.
Pai C.-C.
Chan ASC.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998,
120:
5808
2g
Uemura T.
Zhang X.
Matsumura K.
Sayo N.
Kumobayashi H.
Ohta T.
Nozaki K.
Takaya H.
J. Org. Chem.
1996,
61:
5510
2h
Xiao J.
Nefkens SCA.
Jessop PG.
Ikariya T.
Noyori R.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1996,
37:
2813
2i
McDougal NT.
Schaus SE.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003,
125:
12094
2j
Xu Q.
Gu X.
Liu S.
Dou Q.
Shi M.
J. Org. Chem.
2007,
72:
2240
3a
Cram DJ.
Helgeson RC.
Peacock SC.
Kaplan LJ.
Domeier LA.
Moreau P.
Koga K.
Mayer JM.
Chao Y.
Siegel MG.
Hoffman DH.
Sogah GDY.
J. Org. Chem.
1978,
43:
1930
3b
Sugimura T.
Yamada H.
Inoue S.
Tai A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1997,
8:
649
4a
Guo H.
Ding K.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2000,
41:
10061
4b
Shen X.
Guo H.
Ding K.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2000,
11:
4321
5a
Korostylev A.
Tararov VI.
Fischer C.
Monsees A.
Börner A.
J. Org. Chem.
2004,
69:
3220
5b Very recently, Motoyama reported hydrogenation of BINOL and BINAM using Ru/CNF-P as catalyst. See: Takasaki M.
Motoyama Y.
Yoon S.-H.
Mochida I.
Nagashima H.
J. Org. Chem.
2007,
72:
10291
6a
Ding K.
Guo H.
Li X.
Yuan Y.
Wang Y.
Top. Catal.
2005,
35:
105
6b
Ding K.
Li X.
Ji B.
Guo H.
Kitamura M.
Curr. Org. Synth.
2005,
2:
499
7a
Yuan Y.
Li X.
Sun J.
Ding K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002,
124:
14866
7b
Yuan Y.
Long J.
Sun J.
Ding K.
Chem. Eur. J.
2002,
8:
5033
7c
Carreira EM.
Singer RA.
Lee W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994,
116:
8837
7d
Hu X.
Chen H.
Zhang X.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1999,
38:
3518
7e
Vyskocil S.
Jaracz S.
Smrcina M.
Sticha M.
Hanus V.
Polasek M.
Kocovsky P.
J. Org. Chem.
1998,
63:
7727
8a
Ding K.
Xu Q.
Wang Y.
Liu J.
Yu Z.
Du B.
Wu Y.
Koshima H.
Matsuura T.
Chem. Commun.
1997,
693
8b
Ding K.
Wang Y.
Yun H.
Liu J.
Wu Y.
Terada M.
Okubo Y.
Mikami K.
Chem. Eur. J.
1999,
5:
1734
8c
Smrčina M.
Lorenc M.
Hanuš V.
Sedmera P.
Kočovský P.
J. Org. Chem.
1992,
57:
1917
8d
Körber K.
Tang W.
Hu X.
Zhang X.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2002,
43:
7163
9
Synthesis of (
S
)-5′,6′,7′,8′-tetrahydro-2-amino-2′-hydroxy-1,1′-binaphthyl (
S
)-5
(S)-NOBIN (0.57 g, 2 mmol), 5% Pd/C (0.21 g), and EtOH (15 mL) were placed into a 100 mL autoclave and stirred under 80 bar hydrogen pressure at 80 °C for 10 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to r.t., the catalyst was filtered off, and washed with THF (2 × 10 mL). The combined filtrates were concentrated in vacuum to give a mixture of 3 and 5, which was submitted to column chromatographic separation on silica gel with hexane-EtOAc (9:1) as eluent to afford (S)-5 (382 mg, 66% yield) as a foam solid with >99.5% ee [HPLC on an AD-H column with hexane-i-PrOH (90:10) as eluent, 1 mL min-1, t
R = 13.88 (R) min, t
R = 22.73 min (S)]; mp 113-115 °C; [α]D
20 -59 (c 1, THF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.60-1.63 (m, 2 H), 1.70-1.74 (m, 2 H), 2.13-2.18 (m, 1 H), 2.21-2.26 (m, 1 H), 2.77-2.80 (m, 2 H), 3.76 (s, 2 H), 4.59 (s, 1 H), 6.80 (d, 1 H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.09-7.17 (m, 3 H), 7.26-7.30 (m, 2 H), 7.74 (d, 2 H, J = 8.4 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 23.0, 23.1, 26.8, 29.3, 110.3, 112.8, 117.9, 120.5, 122.6, 127.2, 128.2, 128.3, 129.8, 130.1, 130.4, 133.5, 137.7, 142.7, 151.4. IR (KBr): 3447, 3376, 3052, 2926, 1619, 1471 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C20H19NO: C, 83.01; H, 6.62; N, 4.84. Found: C, 82.94; H, 6.68; N, 4.80.
10
Synthesis of Ligand (
S
)-7
Compound (S)-5 (285 mg, 0.1 mmol) and salicylaldehyde (122 mg, 0.12 mmol) were stirred in toluene (20 mL) and the mixture was heated to reflux for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the product was isolated by flash chromatography on silica gel (316 mg, 80.3% yield); mp 166-168 °C, [α]D
20 -118 (c 0.2, THF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.54-1.58 (m, 2 H), 1.67-1.70 (m, 2 H), 1.99-2.10 (m, 1 H), 2.14-2.17 (m, 1 H), 2.76-2.81 (m, 2 H), 4.27 (s, 1 H), 6.84-6.89 (m, 3 H), 7.11-7.13 (m, 1 H), 7.27-7.32 (m, 3 H), 7.48-7.52 (m, 2 H), 7.59-7.61 (m, 1 H), 8.01-8.03 (m, 1 H), 8.51-8.53 (m, 1 H), 8.73 (s, 1 H), 12.3 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.9, 23.0, 23.1, 27.4, 29.3, 112.7, 117.2, 117.4, 118.8, 119.3, 122.1, 125.7, 126.3, 127.2, 127.5, 128.2, 129.7, 130.2, 130.3, 132.3, 132.7, 132.9, 133.1, 136.4, 143.9, 150.6, 161.3, 162.1. IR (KBr): 3381, 3053, 2928, 1610, 1569 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C27H23NO2: C, 82.42; H, 5.89; N, 3.56. Found: C, 82.39; H, 5.88; N, 3.58.
11 Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structures in this paper have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication number CCDC 658558 [(R)-7]. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html [or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44(1223)336033 or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.].
12a
Fan Q.
Lin L.
Liu J.
Huang Y.
Feng X.
Zhang G.
Org. Lett.
2004,
6:
1285
12b
Yang W.
Shang D.
Liu Y.
Du Y.
Feng X.
J. Org. Chem.
2005,
70:
8533
12c
Tietze LF.
Kettschau G.
Top. Curr. Chem.
1997,
189:
1
13
General Procedure for Catalytic Enantioselctive Hetero-Diels-Alder Reaction
A mixture of (S)-Schiff Base (19.7 mg, 0.05 mmol), Ti(Oi-Pr)4 in toluene (0.25 M, 0.1 mL, 0.025 mmol) and activated powdered 4 Å MS (40 mg) in toluene (1 mL) was stirred for 2 h at 50 °C. The red solution was cooled to r.t. and naproxen (5.8 mg, 0.025 mmol), aldehyde (0.25 mmol), and Danishefsky’s diene (60 µL, 0.3 mmol) were added sequentially. The mixture was stirred for 12 h at r.t. before quenched with TFA (0.2 mL). After stirring for additional 30 min, the mixture was neutralized with sat. NaHCO3 (3 mL). After filtration through a plug of Celite, the organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhyd Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc-hexane, 1:4) to give the products for 1H NMR and HPLC analysis.