Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: A Critical Appraisal

Abstract

Spinous process splitting laminectomy (SPSL) is a surgical technique for lumbar canal stenosis, which aims to preserve the paraspinal muscles. Twenty-five patients with lumbar canal stenosis who consecutively underwent SPSL from June 2005 to December 2005 were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Mean age of the patients at surgery was 62.6 years (range: 42–77 years). Seventeen patients underwent SPSL for single level stenosis, 4 for two levels, and 4 for three levels. In 10 patients, discectomy was simultaneously performed at the same level as SPSL. Of 23 patients (92%) followed for a 1-year period, VAS for back pain, leg pain, and ODI decreased significantly; from 4.8, 8.1, and 54.3–2.1, 2.7, and 23.1, respectively. However, a significant improvement (> 50% of their initial VAS/ODI score) of back pain, leg pain, and functional status was observed in only 65.2, 65.2, and 52.2%, respectively. Complications occurred in 4 patients (16%). Although SPSL for lumbar canal stenosis yielded relatively good clinical outcomes, the percentage of patients showing significant improvements in back pain, leg pain, and functional status were less than expected at one year after surgery.

Key words

lumbar - spinal stenosis - spinous process splitting laminectomy

References

• 1 Macnab I, Cuthbert H, Godfrey CM. The incidence of denervation of the sacrospinalis muscles following spinal surgery.  Spine. 1977;  2 294-298
• 2 Mariconda M, Zanforlino G, Celestino AG, Brancaleone S, Fava R, Milano C. Factors influencing the outcomes of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.  J Spinal Disord. 2000;  13 131-137
• 3 Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome.  Spine. 1993;  18 575-581
• 4 Silvers HR, Lewis PJ, Asch HL. Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis.  J Neurosurg. 1993;  78 695-701
• 5 Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  3 405-408
• 6 Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.  Physiotherapy. 1980;  66 271-273
• 7 Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.  Spine. 1997;  22 2807-2812
• 8 Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Onofrio BM, Hanssen AD. Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone.  J Neurosurg. 1996;  85 793-802
• 9 Mariconda M, Zanforlino G, Celestino GA, Brancaleone S, Fava R, Milano C. Factors influencing the outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.  J Spinal Disord. 2000;  13 131-137
• 10 Benz RJ, Ibrahim ZG, Afshar P, Garfin SR. Predicting complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression.  Clin Orthoped Relat Res. 2001;  384 116-121
• 11 MacCullen GM, Bernini PM, Bernstein SH, Tosteson TD. Clinical and roentgenographic results of decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.  J Spinal Disord. 1994;  7 380-387
• 12 Kleeman TJ, Hiscoe A, Berg EE. Patient outcomes after minimally destabilizing lumbar stenosis decompression: the “Port-Hole” technique.  Spine. 2000;  25 865-870
• 13 Mariconda M, Fava R, Gatto A, Longo C, Milano C. Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective comparative study with conservatively treated patients.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;  15 39-46
• 14 Matsui H, Tsuji H, Sekido H, Hirano N, Katoh Y, Makiyama N. Results of expansive laminoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis in active manual workers.  Spine. 1992;  17 S37-S40
• 15 MacCulloch JA. Microdecompression and uninstrumented single-level fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.  Spine. 1998;  23 2243-2252
• 16 Cho DY, Lin HL, Lee WY, Lee HC. Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;  6 229-239
• 17 Lin SM, Tseng SH, Yang JC, Tu CC. Chimney sublaminar decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;  4 359-364
• 18 Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, Suomalainen O. Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis.  Spine. 1997;  22 2278-2282
• 19 Mofidi A, O’Connor D, El-Abed K, MacCabe JP. Functional outcome study of patients after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: effects of concomitant pathology.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;  15 377-383

Correspondence