Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach

Background and study aims: Decreased scarring is an advantage of minimally invasive surgery. The new experimental technique of natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES) aims at totally scarless surgery. We examined the general attitudes of patients and unaffected persons towards scarless surgery.

Methods and participants: We used a 7-item questionnaire in structured interviews with hospital visitors, following detailed standardized explanation of terms used and of possible complications, to groups of 10 participants, during an “open ward” day. A visual analog scale (VAS) from 1 (none) to 10 (very much) was used for all but one item. Questions concerned the importance of cosmetic results in abdominal surgery, satisfaction regarding existing scars, hypothetical acceptance of increased risk as a trade-off for the absence of scars, and other issues. Data were analyzed for participants overall, and for three age groups and both sexes.

Results: 292 participants (male : female 1 : 1; mean age 43 years) completed the questionnaire. Cosmetic issues were rated as important (median 8), but acceptance of existing scars was also high in those affected (median 8, n = 68). Approval of scarless surgery decreased with a presumed risk increase (from score 9 down to score 5), and overall an increase in risk of 10 % was judged to be acceptable as a trade-off for total absence of scarring. Younger people tended to be less satisfied with scars, but were also less inclined than older people to accept higher surgical risk in this hypothetical context.

Conclusions: People generally seem to favor scarless abdominal surgery, even with some increase in risk.

References

• 1 Kalloo A N, Singh V K, Jagannath S B. et al . Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 114-117
• 2 Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 329-333
• 3 Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels H A. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 913-915
• 4 Meining A, Wilhelm D, Burian M. et al . Development, standardization, and evaluation of NOTES cholecystectomy using a transsigmoid approach in the porcine model: an acute feasibility study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 860-864
• 5 Fong D G, Pai R D, Thompson C C. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 312-318
• 6 Swain P. Endoscopic suturing: now and incoming.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;  17 505-520
• 7 Ko C W, Shin E J, Buscaglia J M. et al . Preliminary pneumoperitoneum facilitates transgastric access into the peritoneal cavity for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a pilot study in a live porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 849-853
• 8 Bernhardt J, Gerber B, Schober H C. et al . NOTES – case report of a unidirectional flexible appendectomy.  Int J Colorect Dis. 2008; [Epub ahead of print];  23 507-550
• 9 Zorron R, Maggioni L C, Pombo L. et al . NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 542-547
• 10 Swain P. A justification for NOTES – natural orifice translumenal endosurgery.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 514-516
• 11 Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S. et al . Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 1345-1348
• 12 Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Mall J. et al . Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs. microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 345-348
• 13 Uranus S, Peng Z, Kronberger L. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using 2-mm instruments.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998;  8 255-259
• 14 Dunker M S, Stiggelbout A M, van Hogezand R A. et al . Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 1334-1340
• 15 Pearl A, Weston J. Attitudes of adolescents about cosmetic surgery.  Ann Plast Surg. 2003;  50 628-630
• 16 Sarwer D B, Cash T F, Magee L. et al . Female college students and cosmetic surgery: an investigation of experiences, attitudes, and body image.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  115 931-938
• 17 Frederick D A, Lever J, Peplau L A. Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: views of men and women across the lifespan.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120 1407-1415
• 18 Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano G. Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 614-618