Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077444
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Impact of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life: a longitudinal study after multidisciplinary treatment
Publication History
submitted 15 November 2007
accepted after revision 28 April 2008
Publication Date:
04 August 2008 (online)
Background and study aims: Bile duct injury (BDI) is associated with increased morbidity and poor survival. The aim of the present study was to compare quality of life (QoL) between patients with BDI and those without after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A longitudinal assessment was performed and risk factors for poor QoL were determined.
Patients and methods: In March 2005 a survey was performed of 403 eligible patients with BDI who were referred to a tertiary center for multidisciplinary treatment by gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons. A longitudinal quality-of-life study was performed to determine changes in outcome after a mean of 5.5 and 11 years’ follow-up.
Results: Of the eligible 403 patients with BDI, 278 (69 %) responded to the survey after a mean follow-up of 5.9 years. The quality-of-life outcome of injured patients was significantly lower in three of the eight domains compared to patients who underwent cholecystectomy without an injury (P < 0.05). In seven of the eight QoL domains injured patients scored significantly worse than the healthy population norms (P < 0.05). The longitudinal assessment after another 5.5 years of follow-up did not show improvement in QoL. Clinical characteristics such as the type of injury and the type of treatment did not affect outcome. Nineteen percent of the patients (n = 53) filed a malpractice claim after BDI. These patients reported better QoL (effect size = 0.6, P = 0.02) when the claim was resolved in their favor than when the claim was rejected.
Conclusions: BDI has a detrimental effect on long-term QoL. QoL in patients with BDI is poor and does not improve during follow-up. The outcome of a malpractice litigation claim is associated with QoL.
References
- 1 Flum D R, Cheadle A, Prela C. et al . Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2003; 290 2168-2173
- 2 Calvete J, Sabater L, Camps B. et al . Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve?. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14 608-611
- 3 Fletcher D R, Hobbs M S, Tan P. et al . Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 1999; 229 449-457
- 4 MacFadyen Jr B V, Vecchio R, Ricardo A E, Mathis C R. Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12 315-321
- 5 Misra S P, Dwivedi M. Endoscopic management of persistent biliary leakage resulting from complete transection of the bile duct at cholecystectomy. Endoscopy. 2006; 38 598-603
- 6 Moossa A R, Easter D W. et al . Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern. Ann Surg. 1992; 215 203-208
- 7 Costamagna G, Pandolfi M, Mutignani M. et al . Long-term results of endoscopic management of postoperative bile duct strictures with increasing numbers of stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54 162-168
- 8 Savader S J, Lillemoe K D, Prescott C A. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster. Ann Surg. 1997; 225 268-273
- 9 Lillemoe K D, Melton G B, Cameron J L. et al . Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg. 2000; 232 430-441
- 10 Boerma D, Rauws E A, Keulemans Y C. et al . Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg. 2001; 234 750-757
- 11 Moore D E, Feurer I D, Holzman M D. et al . Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life. Arch Surg. 2004; 139 476-481
- 12 Sarmiento J M, Farnell M B, Nagorney D M. et al . Quality-of-life assessment of surgical reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-induced bile duct injuries: what happens at 5 years and beyond?. Arch Surg. 2004; 139 483-488
- 13 de Reuver P R, Rauws E A, Bruno M J. et al . Survival in bile duct injury patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multidisciplinary approach of gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons. Surgery. 2007; 142 1-9
- 14 Aaronson N K, Muller M, Cohen P DA. et al . Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51 1055-1068
- 15 Bergman J J, van den Brink G R, Rauws E A. et al . Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut. 1996; 38 141-147
- 16 Ware Jr J E, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30 473-483
- 17 Ware Jr J E, Kosinski M, Keller S D. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. 2nd edn. Boston; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center 1994
- 18 Eypasch E, Williams J I, Wood-Dauphinee S. et al . Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995; 82 216-222
- 19 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York; Academic Press 1977
- 20 Norman G R, Sloan J A, Wyrwich K W. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003; 41 582-592
- 21 Sloan J A, Cella D, Hays R D. Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58 1217-1219
- 22 Guyatt G H, Cook D J. Health status, quality of life, and the individual. JAMA. 1994; 272 630-631
- 23 Quintana J M, Cabriada J, Arostegui I. et al . Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2005; 241 110-118
- 24 Weeks J C, Nelson H, Gelber S. et al . Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002; 287 321-328
- 25 Melton G B, Lillemoe K D, Cameron J L. et al . Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life. Ann Surg. 2002; 235 888-895
- 26 Hunt S M. The problem of quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1997; 6 205-212
- 27 Kern K A. Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cost, cause, and consequences. Arch Surg. 1997; 132 392-397
- 28 Hubben J H, Christiaans I. No spectacular rise in claims for medical damages in The Netherlands: 1993-’01 compared to 1980-’90 [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004; 148 1250-1255
- 29 de Reuver P R, Rauws E A, Lameris J S. et al . Medical litigation claims due to bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007; 151 1732-1736
D. J. Gouma, MD
Department of Surgery
Amsterdam Medical Center
Meibergdreef 9
1105 AZ Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Email: d.j.gouma@amc.uva.nl