Endoscopy 2008; 40(8): 656-663
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077445
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Safety, feasibility, and tolerability of ileocolonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

G.  Terheggen1 , B.  Lanyi1 , S.  Schanz2 , R.  M.  Hoffmann3 , S.  K.  Böhm1 , L.  Leifeld1 , C.  Pohl4 , W.  Kruis1
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk, Köln, Germany
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Kreisklinikum Siegen, Germany
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Kreiskrankenhaus Gummersbach, Germany
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, St. Elisabeth Krankenhaus, Köln, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 12 November 2007

accepted after revision 23 April 2008

Publication Date:
04 August 2008 (online)

Background and study aims: Ileocolonoscopy including biopsies is the first-line investigation in the diagnosis, management, and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data on its safety, feasibility, and tolerability, especially in patients with extensive or severe inflammation, are rare. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the risks of ileocolonoscopy in relation to various disease patterns and to compare possible burdens of the procedure in the endoscopist’s and the patient’s perception.

Patients and methods: We prospectively analyzed a total of 558 consecutive patients, 482 with a confirmed diagnosis of IBD and 76 with suspected IBD. Data were recorded regarding the indication for ileocolonoscopy, sedation, procedure time, completion rate, feasibility of the procedure, patient tolerance, and procedure-related and postprocedure complications. Endoscopic data included the region involved, the nature of the involvement, activity of the disease, and number of biopsies.

Results: In 558 endoscopic procedures performed by 14 gastroenterologists no procedure-related deaths occurred. Major complications, defined as bleeding (n = 1) or perforation (n = 3), occurred in 4/558 patients (0.7 %). Minor complications, which included intense flatulence, tachycardia, allergic reaction to a sedation drug, and autonomic symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and intense perspiration, occurred in 22/558 patients (3.9 %). There was no relationship between the complication rate and the activity of the disease. Mean procedure time was 21.0 minutes and the completion rate, defined by intubation of the terminal ileum, was 94.6 %. We documented a high tolerability independent of the severity of the disease.

Conclusions: Ileocolonoscopy is a safe and feasible procedure in patients with IBD and is well tolerated by patients when carried out by well-trained endoscopists.

References

  • 1 Hoffmann J C, Zeitz M, Bischoff S C. et al . Diagnosis and therapy of ulcerative colitis: results of an evidence based consensus conference by the German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and the Competence Network on Inflammatory Bowel Disease.  Z Gastroenterol. 2004;  42 979-983
  • 2 Stange E F, Schreiber S, Fölsch U R. et al . Diagnostics and treatment of Crohn’s disease: results of an evidence based consensus conference by the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases.  Z Gastroenterol. 2003;  41 19-20
  • 3 Rachmilewitz D. Coated mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) versus sulphasalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis; a randomized study trial.  BMJ. 1989;  298 82-86
  • 4 Liebermann D A, Smith F W. Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 946-951
  • 5 DiSario J A, Foutch P G, Mai H D. et al . Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 941-945
  • 6 Johnson D A, Gurney M, Volpe R J. et al . A prospective study of prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;  85 969-974
  • 7 Rex D K, Lehmann G A, Ulbright T M. et al . Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;  88 825-831
  • 8 Rogge J D, Elmore M F, Mahoney S J. et al . Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 1775-1780
  • 9 Nelson D B, McQuaid K R, Bond J H. et al . Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 307-314
  • 10 Sieg A, Theilmeier A. Results of coloscopy screening in 2005: an Internet-based documentation.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006;  131 379-383
  • 11 Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rösch T. et al . The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1116-1122
  • 12 Macrae F A, Tan K G, Williams C B. et al . Toward safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopies.  Gut. 1983;  24 376-383
  • 13 Basson M D, Etter L, Panzini L A. et al . Rates of colonoscopic perforation in current practice [letter].  Gastroenterology. 1998;  114 1115
  • 14 Eckardt V F, Kanzler G, Schmitt T. et al . Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation [letter].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 560-565
  • 15 Zubarik R, Fleischer D E, Mastropietro C. et al . Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 322-328
  • 16 Anderson M L, Pasha T M, Leighton J A. et al . Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 3418-3422
  • 17 Anderson J C, Gonzalez J D, Messina C R. et al . Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 2784-2787
  • 18 Waye J D, Lewis B S, Yessayan S. et al . Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;  15 347-351
  • 19 Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: an experience with 1555 polypectomies.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;  29 825-831
  • 20 Rosen L, Bub D S, Reed J F. et al . Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 1126-1131
  • 21 Gibbs D H, Opelka F G, Beck D E. et al . Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 806-810
  • 22 Waye J D, Kahn O, Auerbach M E. et al . Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 1996;  6 343-377
  • 23 Hall C, Dorricott N J, Donovan I A. et al . Colon perforation during colonoscopy: surgical versus conservative management.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 542-544
  • 24 Reiertsen O, Skjoto J, Jacobsen C D. et al . Complications of fiberoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy: five years’ experience in a central hospital.  Endoscopy. 1987;  19 1-6
  • 25 Di Prima R E, Barkin J S, Blinder M. et al . Age as a risk factor in colonoscopy: fact versus fiction.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;  83 123-125
  • 26 Alemayehu G, Järnerot G. Colonoscopy during an attack of severe ulcerative colitis is a safe procedure and of great value in clinical decision making.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 187-190
  • 27 Carbonnel F, Lavergne A, Lemann M. et al . Colonoscopy of acute colitis. A safe and reliable tool for assessment of severity.  Dig Dis Sci. 1994;  39 1550-1557
  • 28 Koobatian G J, Choi P M. Safety of surveillance colonoscopy in long-standing ulcerative colitis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 1472-1475
  • 29 Rubin P H, Friedman S, Harpaz N. et al . Colonoscopic polypectomy in chronic colitis: conservative management after endoscopic resection of dysplastic polyps.  Gastroenterology. 1999;  117 1295-1300
  • 30 Hardman K A, Manjunath S, Trash D B. Safety of colonoscopy.  J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995;  29 398-400
  • 31 Chutkan R K, Scherl E, Waye J D. Colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease.  Gastroinest Endosc Clin North Am. 2002;  12 463-483
  • 32 Fefferman D S, Farrell R J. Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: indications, surveillance and use in clinical practice.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 11-24
  • 33 Modigliani R. Endoscopic management of inflammatory bowel disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 53-65
  • 34 Hommes D W, van Deventer S J. Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 1561-1573
  • 35 Lee S D, Cohen R D. Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease.  Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002;  31 119-132
  • 36 Pera A, Bellando P, Caldera D. et al . Colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease.  Gastroenterology. 1987;  92 181-185
  • 37 Leighton J A, Shen B, Baron T H. et al . ASGE guideline: endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 558-565
  • 38 Daperno M, Sostegni R, Lavagna A. et al . The role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease.  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2004;  8 209-214
  • 39 Allez M, Lemann M, Bonnet J. et al . Long term outcome of patients with active Crohn’s disease exhibiting extensive and deep ulcerations at colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 947-953
  • 40 Geboes K, Ectors N, D’Haens G. et al . Is ileoscopy with biopsy worthwhile in patients presenting with symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease ?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 201-206
  • 41 Chutkan R K, Wayne J D. Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. In: Kirshner JB (ed). Inflammatory bowel disease. 5th edn. Baltimore; Williams & Wilkins 2000: 453-477
  • 42 Lewis B S. Ileoscopy should be part of standard colonoscopy: a comparison of radiographic and endoscopic evaluation of the ileum.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;  31 103-104
  • 43 Church J M. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 556-560
  • 44 Cirocco W C. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 964-968
  • 45 Marshall J B, Barthel J S. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 518-520
  • 46 Waye J D, Bashkoff E. Total colonoscopy: is it always possible?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 152-154
  • 47 Kim W H, Cho Y J, Park J Y. et al . Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 600-605
  • 48 Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M. et al . The effects of gender and age on the colonoscopic examination.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;  32 69-75
  • 49 Bowles C J, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al . A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.  Gut. 2004;  53 277-283
  • 50 Rex D K, Chen S C, Overhiser A J. Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 879-883
  • 51 Hull T, Church J M. Colonoscopy: how difficult, how painful?.  Surg Endosc. 1994;  8 784-787
  • 52 Froehlich F, Thorens J, Schwizer W. et al . Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 1-9
  • 53 Macken E, Gevers A M, Hendrickx A. et al . Midazolam versus diazepam in lipid emulsion as conscious sedation for colonoscopy with or without reversal of sedation with flumazenil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 57-61
  • 54 Schmitt C M, Schutz S M, Lee J G. et al . Patient comfort during conscious sedation: discrimination from patient satisfaction [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 46
  • 55 Saunders B P, Fukumatoto M, Halligan S. et al . Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 124-126
  • 56 Schutz S M, Lee J G, Schmitt C M. et al . Clues to patient dissatisfaction with conscious sedation for colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 1476-1479
  • 57 Sadahiro S, Ohmura T, Yamada Y. et al . Analysis of length and surface area of each segment of the large intestine according to age, sex, and physique.  Surg Radiol Anat. 1992;  14 251-257
  • 58 Conn M, Allen M L, De Martino P. et al . Factors affecting duration of colonoscopy [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 294
  • 59 Mahajan R J, Johnson J C, Marshall J B. Predictors of patient cooperation during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997;  24 220-223
  • 60 Eckardt V F, Kanzler G, Willems D. et al . Colonoscopy without premedication versus barium enema: a comparison of patient discomfort.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 177-180

G. Terheggen, MD 

Department of Internal Medicine
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk

Buchforststraße 2
51103 Köln
Germany

Email: gterheggen@web.de