Mucosal morphology in Barrett’s esophagus: interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging

Background and study aims: We have recently proposed a classification of mucosal morphology in Barrett’s esophagus based on three criteria: regularity of mucosal pattern, regularity of vascular pattern, and presence of abnormal blood vessels. We aimed to evaluate the interobserver agreement with the proposed mucosal morphology classification and to assess the additional value of narrow band imaging (NBI) over high resolution white light endoscopy (HR-WLE).

Patients and methods: Five international experts in the field of Barrett’s imaging and seven community endoscopists with no expertise in this field independently evaluated magnified still images from 50 areas, obtained with HR-WLE and NBI, in Barrett’s esophagus patients. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were used for scoring imaging quality. Interobserver agreement for mucosal morphology and yield for identifying early neoplasia were assessed.

Results: Imaging qualities of NBI were rated more highly than HR-WLE, when evaluated separately as well as in a side-by-side comparison. The interobserver agreement ranged from 0.40 to 0.56 and did not significantly differ between expert and non-expert endoscopists. The overall yield for correctly identifying images of early neoplasia was 81 % for HR-WLE, 72 % for NBI and 83 % for HR-WLE + NBI, with no significant difference between experts and non-experts.

Conclusion: Interobserver agreement for the classification of mucosal morphology was moderate. Although NBI was rated more highly than HR-WLE for imaging quality, this did not result in improved interobserver agreement or increased yield for identifying early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. This applied to non-expert as well as expert endoscopists.

References

• 1 Devesa S S, Blot W J, Fraumeni Jr J F. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States.  Cancer. 1998;  83 2049-2053
• 2 Sampliner R E. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1888-1895
• 3 Hirota W K, Zuckerman M J, Adler D G. et al . ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper GI tract.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 570-580
• 4 Sharma P, Weston A P, Topalovski M. et al . Magnification chromoendoscopy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus.  Gut. 2003;  52 24-27
• 5 Guelrud M, Ehrlich E E. Endoscopic classification of Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 58-65
• 6 Endo T, Awakawa T, Takahashi H. et al . Classification of Barrett’s epithelium by magnifying endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 641-647
• 7 Meining A, Rosch T, Kiesslich R. et al . Inter- and intra-observer variability of magnification chromoendoscopy for detecting specialized intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 160-164
• 8 Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M. et al . Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging.  J Biomed Opt. 2004;  9 568-577
• 9 Kara M A, Ennahachi M, Fockens P. et al . Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology) in Barrett’s esophagus by using narrow band imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 155-166
• 10 Dixon M F. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited.  Gut. 2002;  51 130-131
• 11 Curvers W L, Singh R, Song L M. et al . Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system.  Gut. 2008;  57 167-172
• 12 Anagnostopoulos G K, Yao K, Kaye P. et al . Magnification endoscopy with narrow band imaging in Barrett’s esophagus.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  40 (Suppl. 4) S192-S193
• 13 Anagnostopoulos G K, Yao K, Kaye P. et al . Novel endoscopic observation in Barrett’s oesophagus using high resolution magnification endoscopy and narrow band imaging.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;  26 501-507
• 14 Ragunath K, Krasner N, Raman V S. et al . A randomized, prospective cross-over trial comparing methylene blue-directed biopsy and conventional random biopsy for detecting intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 998-1003
• 15 Yao K, Takaki Y, Ohara J. et al . Magnification endoscopy outlines the microvascular architecture and extent of Barrett’s intramucosal carcinoma prior to endoscopic resection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 1064-1065
• 16 Singh R, Owen V, Karageorgiou H. et al . Narrow band imaging with magnification is superior to white light endoscopy with magnification in studying the mucosal morphology in Barrett’s oesophagus [abstract].  Gut. 2008;  57 Suppl 1 A14-A15
• 17 Wallace M B, Perelman L T, Backman V. et al . Endoscopic detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using light-scattering spectroscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  119 677-682
• 18 Wolfsen H C, Hemminger L L, Wallace M B. Detection of residual Barrett’s mucosa after photodynamic therapy (PDT) using high definition narrow band imaging [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 A310
• 19 Wong Kee Song L M, Wilson B C. Endoscopic detection of early upper GI cancers.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;  19 833-856
• 20 Ferguson D D, DeVault K R, Krishna M. et al . Enhanced magnification-directed biopsies do not increase the detection of intestinal metaplasia in patients with GERD.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 1611-1616
• 21 Savoy A D, Wolfsen H C, Raimondo M. et al . The role of surveillance endoscopy and endosonography after endoscopic ablation of high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma of the esophagus.  Dis Esophagus. 2008;  21 108-113
• 22 Wolfsen H C, Crook J E, Krishna M. et al . Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  135 32-40
• 23 Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.  Biometrics. 1977;  33 159-174
• 24 Curvers W, Baak L, Kiesslich R. et al . Chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging compared with high-resolution magnification endoscopy in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 670-679
• 25 Sumiyama K, Kaise M, Nakayoshi T. et al . Combined use of a magnifying endoscope with a narrow band imaging system and a multibending endoscope for en bloc EMR of early stage gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 79-84