AAC and RTI: Building Classroom-Based Strategies for Every Child in the Classroom

ABSTRACT

Educators were previously encouraged to use IQ-achievement discrepancy to identify children with learning disabilities. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act promotes an alternative method, response to intervention, or RTI, not only to identify these children but also to provide early intervention to all children at risk for school failure. Children with complex communication needs who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are at risk for failure in the classroom and can benefit from the educational supports provided through RTI. This article discusses the levels of support provided by RTI, the speech-language pathologist's role in RTI, and strategies and supports for achieving academic success for children who use AAC.

KEYWORDS

Response to intervention (RTI) - classroom intervention - peer interactions - teacher collaboration - classroom strategies

REFERENCES

• 1 U.S. Department of Education .Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities and preschool grants for children with disabilities; final rule. 2006 http://Available at: http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cregs%2C Accessed April 27, 2007
• 2 National Research Center on Learning Disabilities .Responsiveness to intervention in conjunction with learning disability determination [brochure]. Lawrence, KS; National Research Center on Learning Disabilities 2007
• 3 Fuchs D, Fuchs L. Responsiveness-to-intervention: a blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents.  Teaching Exceptional Children. 2001;  , Sept/Oct:57–61
• 4 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Responsiveness to intervention: new roles for speech-language pathologists. Available at: http://www.asha.org/members/slp/schools/prof-consult/NewRolesSLP.htm Accessed April 21, 2007
• 5 Fuchs D, Fuchs L. Introduction to response to intervention: what, why, and how valid is it?.  Read Res Q. 2006;  41 93-99
• 6 Kovaleski J, Prasse D. Response to instruction in the identification of learning disabilities: a guide for school teams. Helping Children at Home and School II: Handouts for Families and Educators, S8–159. Bethesda, MD; National Association of School Psychologists 2004
• 7 National Center on Learning Disabilities .Core findings about response to intervention. 2007. Available at: http://www.ncld.org/content/view/1220/389/ Accessed January 18, 2008
• 8 National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities .Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. 2005. http://Available at: www.ldonline.org/?module=uploads&func=download&fileId=461 Accessed January 18, 2008
• 9 Justice L. Creating language-rich preschool classroom environments.  Teaching Exceptional Children. 2004;  37 36-44
• 10 Light J. “Let's go star fishing”: reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided.  Augment Altern Commun. 1997;  13 158-171
• 11 Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Special Needs. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 2005
• 12 Sturm J, Erickson K, Yoder D. State of the science: enhancing literacy participation through AAC technologies.  Assistive Technology. 2003;  14 45-54
• 13 Sturm J, Clendon S. Augmentative and alternative communication, language, and literacy: fostering the relationship.  Top Lang Disord. 2004;  24 76-91
• 14 Koppenhaver D, Pierce P. Written language research in AAC. Paper presented at: August 1994 ISAAC Research Symposium; Kerkade, The Netherlands. Available at: http://www.gac.edu/~dkoppenh/AAClang94.html Accessed December 12, 2000
• 15 Helmer D, Toner M. Inclusive vocabulary program.  Advance for Speech-Language Pathologists & Audiologists. 2008;  18 11
• 16 Hetzroni O E. AAC and literacy.  Disabil Rehabil. 2004;  26 1305-1312
• 17 Sturm J, Spadorcia S, Cunningham J et al.. What happens to reading between first and third grade? Implications for students who use.  Augment Altern Commun. 2006;  22 21-36
• 18 Fallon K, Light L, McNaughton D, Drager K, Hammer C. The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;  47 1424-1439
• 19 Millar D, Light J, McNaughton D. The effect of direct instruction and writer's workshop on the early writing skills of children who use augmentative and alternative communication.  Augment Altern Commun. 2004;  20 164-178
• 20 Numeroff L J. If You Give a Mouse a Cookie. New York, NY; Harper Collins 1985
• 21 Grether S. Augmentative and alternative communication and literacy: strategies for building skills.  Hearsay: Journal of the Ohio Speech Language Hearing Association. 2006;  18 21-25
• 22 Carter M, Maxwell K. Promoting interaction with children using augmentative communication through a peer-directed intervention.  Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 1998;  45 75-96
• 23 Light J, Dattilo J, English J, Gutierrez L, Hartz J. Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmentative communication.  J Speech Hear Res. 1992;  35 865-875
• 24 Rabidoux P, Macdonald J. An interactive taxonomy of mothers and children during storybook interactions.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2000;  9 331-344
• 25 Lilienfeld M, Alant E. The social interaction of an adolescent who uses AAC: the evaluation of a peer-training program.  Augment Altern Commun. 2005;  21 278-294
• 26 Von Tetzchner S, Brekke K, Sjothun B, Grindheim E. Constructing preschool communities of learners that afford alternative language development.  Augment AlternCommun. 2005;  21 82-100
• 27 Goossens C, Crain S, Elder P. Engineering the Preschool Environments for Interactive, Symbolic Communication. Birmingham, AL; Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications 1992
• 28 Romski M A, Sevcik R. Breaking the Speech Barrier: Language Development Through Augmented Means. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 1996
• 29 Harris M D, Reichle J. The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2004;  13 155-167
• 30 Binger C, Light J. The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use.  Augment Altern Commun. 2007;  23 30-34