Download PDF
Der Klinikarzt 2008; 37(6): 303-308
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1081553
In diesem Monat

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Rehabilitation des Schlaganfalls - Funktionelle Besserung über multimodale Therapieansätze

Stroke rehabilitation - Functional improvements with multimodal therapyDirk Sander1 , 2 , Holger Poppert2 , Kerstin Sander1 , 2
  • 1Neurologische Klinik, Medical Park, Bischofswiesen(Direktor: Prof. Dr. D. Sander)
  • 2Neurologische Klinik, TU München, München (Direktor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. B. Hemmer)
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 June 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Obwohl in den letzten Jahren bei der Akutbehandlung des Schlaganfalls wesentliche Fortschritte zu verzeichnen waren (Thrombolyse, Behandlung auf der Stroke Unit), ist der Schlaganfall nach wie vor die Erkrankung, die am häufigsten zu einer dauerhaften Behinderung führt. Deswegen spielt die effektive und möglichst früh einsetzende multimodale Rehabilitationsbehandlung eine wichtige Rolle im Rahmen der Therapie der Betroffenen. Ein besseres Verständnis des natürlichen Verlaufs der funktionellen Reorganisation nach einem Schlaganfall hat dabei dazu beigetragen, das Behandlungsspektrum mithilfe neuer Techniken wesentlich zu erweitern. In den letzten Jahren wurde die Effektivität zahlreicher Verfahren der Schlaganfallrehabilitation in kontrollierten Studien untersucht, sodass mittlerweile - zumindest für bestimmte Verfahren - evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen vorliegen. In der folgenden Übersicht wird der aktuelle Stand der evidenzbasierten Schlaganfallrehabilitation unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Frührehabilitation dargestellt.

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term major disability in developed countries, although several improvements could be achieved in acute stroke therapy (e. g. thrombolysis, stroke-unit treatment). Therefore, an early onset of an intensive and multimodal rehabilitation workup is of particular importance to reduce stroke morbidity and stroke-related dependency. Stroke rehabilitation was enhanced due to a better understanding of the natural course of functional reorganisation after stroke and the development of techniques to modulate these processes. During the last years several therapeutic strategies for stroke rehabilitation were studied in controlled clinical trials. Therefore, there are evidence-based recommendations available for some of these therapies. This review summarizes the actual status of evidence-based stroke rehabilitation particular focussing on early rehabilitation.

Key words

stroke - rehabilitation - evidence-based therapy - review

Literatur

  • 1 Asanuma H, Pavlides C.. Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals.  Neuroreport. 1997;  8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bertram M, Brandt T.. Neurologisch-neurochirurgische Frührehabilitation. Eine aktuelle Bestandsaufnahme.  Nervenarzt. 2007;  78 1160-1174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M, Cramer SC.. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  58 464-473
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Church C, Price C, Pandyan AD. et al. . Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the shoulder after acute stroke.  Stroke. 2006;  37 2995-3001
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Enderby P, Broeckx J, Hospers W. et al. . Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.  Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;  17 320-331
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Eng JJ, Tang PF.. Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: a synthesis of the evidence.  Expert Rev Neurother. 2007;  7 1417-1436
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, Law WA.. Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury.  Science. 1982;  217 855-857
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Grade C, Redford B, Chrostowski J. et al. . Methylphenidate in early poststroke recovery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;  79 1047-1050
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Iacoboni M, Mazziotta JC.. Mirror neuron system: basic findings and clinical applications.  Ann Neurol. 2007;  62 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kalra L, Ratan R.. Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation 2006.  Stroke. 2007;  38 235-237
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Kalra L, Ratan RR.. Advances in stroke regenerative medicine 2007.  Stroke. 2008;  39 273-275
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Heuschmann PU, Marschall D. et al. . Lifetime cost of ischemic stroke in Germany: results and national projections from a population-based stroke registry: the Erlangen Stroke Project.  Stroke. 2006;  37 1179-1183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI.. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;  22 111-121
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Lefaucheur JP.. Stroke recovery can be enhanced by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).  Neurophysiol Clin. 2006;  36 105-115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD.. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke.  Stroke. 1999;  30 573-579
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Malcolm MP, Triggs WJ, Light KE. et al. . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;  86 707-715
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Martinsson L, Hardemark HG, Wahlgren NG.. Amphetamines for improving stroke recovery: a systematic cochrane review.  Stroke. 2003;  34
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Nelles G.. Cortical reorganization - effects of intensive therapy.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;  22 239-244
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Pollock A, Baer GD, Langhorne P, Pomeroy VM.. Physiotherapy treatment approaches for stroke.  Stroke. 2008;  39 519-520
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Robinson RG, Schultz SK, Castillo C. et al. . Nortriptyline versus fluoxetine in the treatment of depression and in short-term recovery after stroke: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study.  Am J Psychiatry. 2000;  157 351-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Sabel BA, Kenkel S, Kasten E.. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;  22 399-420
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F, Koenig E.. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.  Lancet. 2001;  358 787-790
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC.. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke?.  Stroke. 2006;  37 1941-1952
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Sutbeyaz S, Yavuzer G, Sezer N, Koseoglu BF.. Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;  88 555-559
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Walker-Batson D, Curtis S, Natarajan R. et al. . A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia.  Stroke. 2001;  32 2093-2098
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Woldag H, Hummelsheim H.. Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review.  J Neurol. 2002;  249 518-528
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Woldag H, Waldmann G, Heuschkel G, Hummelsheim H.. Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients?.  Clin Rehabil. 2003;  17 723-730
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP. et al. . Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial.  Lancet Neurol. 2008;  7 33-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

1 EXtremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation

2 Safety and Effectiveness of Cortical Stimulation in the Treatment of Upper Extremity

Korrespondenz

Prof. Dr. Dirk Sander

Neurologische Klinik Medical Park Loipl

Thanngasse 15

83483 Bischofswiesen

Email: d.sander@mac.com