Using Web Services for Linking Genomic Data to Medical Information Systems

Summary

Objectives: To develop a new perspective for biomedical information systems, regarding the introduction of ideas, methods and tools related to the new scenario of genomic medicine.

Methods: Technological aspects related to the analysis and integration of heterogeneous clinical and genomic data include mapping clinical and genetic concepts, potential future standards or the development of integrated biomedical ontologies. In this clinicomics scenario, we describe the use of Web services technologies to improve access to and integrate different information sources. We give a concrete example of the use of Web services technologies: the Onto Fusion project.

Results: Web services provide new biomedical informatics (BMI) approaches related to genomic medicine. Customized workflowswill aid research tasks by linking heterogeneous Web services. Two significant examples of these European Commission-funded efforts are the INFOBIOMED Network of Excellence and the Advancing Clinico-Genomic Trials on Cancer (ACGT) integrated project.

Conclusions: Supplying medical researchers and practitioners with omicsdata and biologists with clinical datasets can help to develop genomic medicine. BMI is contributing by providing the informatics methods and technological infrastructure needed for these collaborative efforts.

Keywords

Biomedical informatics - Web services - genomic medicine - hospital information systems

• References

• 1 Collins FS. Shattuck Lecture – “Medical and Societal Consequences of the Human Genome Project”. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 28-37.
• 2 Kulikowski C. The Micro-Macro Spectrum of Medical Informatics. Challenges: From Molecular Medicine to Transforming Health Care in a Globalizing Society. Methods Inf Med 2001; 41: 20-24.
• 3 Martín F, Maojo V, López-Campos G. Integrating genomics into health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (01) 25-30.
• 4 McKusick VA. The anatomy of the human genome: a neo-Vesalian basis for medicine in the 21st century. JAMA 2001; 286 (18) 2289-2295.
• 5 Subramanian G. et al. Implications of the human genome for understanding human biology and medicine. JAMA 2001; 286 (18) 2296-2307.
• 6 Maojo V, Martin-Sanchez F. Bioinformatics: Towards New Directions for Public Health. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 208-214.
• 7 Sax U, Schmidt S. Integration of genomic data in Electronic Health Records – opportunities and dilemmas. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (04) 546-550.
• 8 Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 (online). Mar 15,2001 (cited Feb 15,2007). Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.
• 9 Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1 (online). June 24, 2003 (cited Feb 15, 2007). Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/soap/.
• 10 Universal Description, Discovery and Integration (UDDI) (online). 2006 (cited Feb15,2007). Available from: http://www.uddi.org/.
• 11 Stein L. Creating abioinformatics nation. Nature 2002; 417 6885 119-120.
• 12 Bryson K, Loux V, Bossy R, Nicolas P, Chaillou S, van de Guchte M, Penaud S, Maguin E, Hoebeke M, Bessieres P, Gibrat JF. AGMIAL: implementing an annotation strategy for prokaryote genomes as a distributed system. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34 (12) 3533-3345.
• 13 Rambaldi D, Guffanti A, Morandi P, Cassata G. Nema Foot Printer: a web based software for the identification of conserved non-coding genome sequence regions between C. elegans and C. briggsae. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 06 (Suppl. 04) S22.
• 14 Hallin PF, Ussery DW. CBS Genome Atlas Database: a dynamic storage for bioinformatic results and sequence data. Bioinformatics 2004; 20 (18) 3682-3686. Epub July 15,2004.
• 15 European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) (online). 2007 (cited Feb 15, 2007). Available from: http://www.ebi.ac.uk.
• 16 Hull D, Wolstencroft K, Stevens R, Goble C, Pocock MR, Li P, Oinn T. Taverna: atool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34 (Web Server issue) W729-732.
• 17 myGrid Project (online). 2004 (cited Feb 22, 2007). Available from: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/.
• 18 Cover Pages (online). 2001 (cited Feb 22, 2007). Available from: http://xml.coverpages.org/xlang.html.
• 19 Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI.org) (online). Jan 02, 2007 (cited Feb 22, 2007). Available from: http://www.bpmi.org/.
• 20 Leymann F. Web Services Flow Language (WSFL 1.0) (online). May 2001 (cited Feb 22, 2007). Available from: http://xml.coverpages.org/WSFL-Guide-200110.pdf.
• 21 Business Process Execution Language for Web Services version 1.1 (BPEL) (online). Feb 08, 2007 (cited Feb 22,2007 ). Available from: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws-bpel/.
• 22 Electronic Business using eXtensible Markup Language (ebXML) (online). 2006 (cited Feb 22, 2007). Available from: http://www.ebxml.org/.
• 23 Simple Conceptual Unified Flow Language (SCULF) (online). 2005 (cited Feb 22, 2007). Available from: http://www.gridworkflow.org/snips/gridworkflow/space/SCUFL.
• 24 Wilkinson MD, Links M. BioMOBY: an open source biological Web services proposal. Brief Bioinform 2002; 03 (04) 331-341.
• 25 Navas-Delgado I, del Rojano-Munoz M, Ramirez S, Perez AJ, Andres Leon E, Aldana-Montes JF, Trelles O. Intelligent client for integrating bioinformatics services. Bioinformatics 2006; 22 (01) 106-111. Epub Oct 27,2005.
• 26 Wilkinson M. Gbrowse Moby: a Web-based browser for Bio Moby Services. Source Code Biol Med 2006; 01: 4.
• 27 Kawas E, Senger M, Wilkinson MD. Bio Moby extensions to the Taverna workflow management and enactment software. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 07: 523.
• 28 Cannata N, Merelli E, Altman RB. Time to organize the bioinformatics resourceome. PLoS Comput Biol 2006; 02 (02) e20.
• 29 Alonso-Calvo R, Maojo V, Billhardt H, Martin-Sanchez F, Garcia-Remesal M, Perez-Rey D. An agent-and ontology-based system for integrating public gene, protein, and disease databases. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40 (01) 17-29.
• 30 Advancing Clinico Genomic Trials on Cancer (ACGT) (online). 2007 (cited Feb 22, 2007). Available from: http://www.eu-acgt.org.
• 31 Maojo V, Garcia-Remesal M, Billhardt H, Alonso-Calvo R, Perez-Rey D, Martin-Sanchez F. Designing new methodologies for integrating biomedical information in clinical trials. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (02) 180-185.
• 32 OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (online). Feb 10,2004 (cited Feb 15,2007 ). Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
• 33 Java Agent Development Framework (online). Feb 1,2007 (cited Feb 15,2007). Available from: http://jade.tilab.com/.
• 34 RDF Data Query Language (online). Jan 09,2004 (cited Feb 15, 2007). Available from: http://www.w3.org/Submission/RDQL/.
• 35 The DARPA Agent Markup Language Homepage (online). Jan 13,2006 (cited Feb 15,2007). Available from: http://www.daml.org/.
• 36 The INFOBIOMED Network of Excellence Homepage (online). 2006 (cited Feb 22, 2007). Available from: http://www.infobiomed.org.
• 37 Pollard TD. The future of biomedical research: from the inventory of genes to understanding physiology and the molecular basis of disease. JAMA 2002; 287 (13) 1725-1727.
• 38 Rindfleisch TC, Brutlag DL. Directions for clinical research and genomic research into the next decade: implications for informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 05 (05) 404-411.
• 39 Sikorski R. et al. Genomic Medicine, internet resources for medical genetics. JAMA 1997; 278: 1212-1213.
• 40 Brandt CA, Sun K, Charpentier P, Nadkarni PM. Integration of Web-based and PC-based clinical research databases. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (03) 287-295.
• 41 Kulikowski C. The Scope of Medical Informatics as Art and Science. Methods Inf Med 1996; 35: 185-188.