Thromb Haemost 2004; 91(04): 655-666
DOI: 10.1160/TH03-11-0722
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients

Behrouz Kassaï
1   Department of Clinical Pharmacology / EA3736, University of Lyon, France
,
Jean-Pierre Boissel
1   Department of Clinical Pharmacology / EA3736, University of Lyon, France
,
Michel Cucherat
1   Department of Clinical Pharmacology / EA3736, University of Lyon, France
,
Sandrine Sonie
2   Department of Child Psychiatry / ITTAC, University of Lyon, France
,
Nirav R. Shah
3   Division of Primary Care, New York University, New York, USA
,
Alain Leizorovicz
1   Department of Clinical Pharmacology / EA3736, University of Lyon, France
› Author Affiliations
Financial support: Dr. Kassai was supported by a grant from Pharmacia & Upjohn.
Further Information

Publication History

Received 28 November 2003

Accepted after resubmission 15 January 2004

Publication Date:
06 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Evaluation of the accuracy of ultrasound has yielded heterogeneous results. Our objective was to summarize the evidence on the accuracy of ultrasound compared to venography in asymptomatic patients, taking into account the variation due to threshold differences. Searches of journal table of contents, computer databases (Medline, Embase, Biomed, Cochrane) and conference proceedings were performed. A study was eligible if it prospectively compared ultrasound to venography for the diagnosis of DVT in asymptomatic patients. Data of studies selected for inclusion were extracted independently by two authors. High quality studies with consecutive patient enrollment, blind evaluation of the two techniques, and absence of verification bias are summarized as Level 1, while those not fulfilling one or more of these criteria are considered Level 2. Original study authors were contacted to confirm accuracy and to provide missing data. A pooled estimate of the accuracy of ultrasound was obtained according to the method of Moses and coworkers. This method gives a summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The DOR is a single indicator of test performance. It varies between 0 and infinity and exceeds 1, only when ultrasound is more often positive in patients with DVT relative to those without DVT. Higher DOR indicates better discriminatory test performance. Thirty one studies were rated as potentially unbiased and graded as Level 1.The mean prevalence of DVT as determined by venography was 22%. In Level 1 studies, the odds of positive ultrasound in proximal veins was 379 times higher (95% confidence limits 65, 2,200) and in distal veins 32 times higher (7.5, 135) among patients with DVT than those without. Our results suggest that, particularly for proximal veins, ultrasound is accurate for the diagnosis of DVT in asymptomatic postoperative orthopedic patients. More research is needed in other clinical settings.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Prins MH. et al. Deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1999; 353 9151 479-85.
  • 2 Hansson PO, Eriksson E, Welin L. et al. Prevalence of APC resistance and its relationship to arterial and venous thromboembolism in a general population sample of elderly Swedish men: The Study of Men Born in 1913. J Intern Med 1999; 245 (06) 593-600.
  • 3 Nordstrom M, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D. et al. A prospective study of the incidence of deepvein thrombosis within a defined urban population. J Intern Med 1992; 232 (02) 155-60.
  • 4 Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83 (05) 657-60.
  • 5 Geerts WH, Heit JA, Clagett GP. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 2001; 119 (Suppl. 01) 132S-175S.
  • 6 Leizorovicz A, Kassai B, Becker F. et al. The assessment of deep vein thromboses for therapeutic trials. Angiology 2003; 54 (01) 19-24.
  • 7 Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR. et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deepvein thrombosis. Lancet 1995; 345 8961 1326-30.
  • 8 DeWeese J, Rogoff S. Phlebographic patterns of acute deep venous thrombosis of the leg. Surgery 1963; 53: 99-108.
  • 9 Rabinov K, Paulin S. Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg. Arch Surg 1972; 104 (02) 134-44.
  • 10 Kalodiki E, Nicolaides AN, Al-Kutoubi A. et al. How “gold” is the standard? Interobservers’ variation on venograms. Int Angiol 1998; 17 (02) 83-8.
  • 11 Borris LC, Lassen MR. Venography in deep venous thrombosis: postoperative screening of patients in prophylaxis studies. Haemostasis 1993; 23 (Suppl. 01) 80-4.
  • 12 Picolet H, Leizorovicz A, Revel D. et al. Reliability of phlebography in the assessment of venous thrombosis in a clinical trial. Haemostasis 1990; 20 (06) 362-7.
  • 13 Wille-Jorgensen P, Borris LC, Lassen MR. et al. Potential influence of observer variation in thromboprophylactic trials. Haemostasis 1992; 22 (04) 211-5.
  • 14 Mantoni M, Strandberg C, Neergaard K, Sloth C, Jorgensen PS, Thamsen H. et al. Triplex US in the diagnosis of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis. Acta Radiol 1997; 38 (02) 327-31.
  • 15 Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY. et al. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341 (11) 793-800.
  • 16 Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128 (08) 663-77.
  • 17 Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J. The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129 (12) 1044-9.
  • 18 Wells PS, Lensing AW, Davidson BL. et al. Accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients after orthopedic surgery. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122 (01) 47-53.
  • 19 Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48 (01) 119-30.
  • 20 Barnes CL, Nelson CL, Nix ML. et al. Duplex scanning versus venography as a screening examination in total hip arthroplasty patients. Clin Orthop 1991; (271) 180-9.
  • 21 Barnes RW, Nix ML, Barnes CL. et al. Perioperative asymptomatic venous thrombosis: role of duplex scanning versus venography. J Vasc Surg 1989; 09 (02) 251-60.
  • 22 Davidson BL, Elliott CG, Lensing AW. Low accuracy of color Doppler ultrasound in the detection of proximal leg vein thrombosis in asymptomatic high-risk patients. The RD Heparin Arthroplasty Group. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117 (09) 735-8.
  • 23 Crippa L, Ravasi F, D’Angelo SV. et al. Diagnostic value of compression ultrasonography and fibrinogen-related parameters for the detection of postoperative deep vein thrombosis following elective hip replacement: a pilot study. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74 (05) 1235-9.
  • 24 Agnelli G, Volpato R, Radicchia S. et al. Detection of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography in hip surgery patients. Thromb Haemost 1992; 68 (03) 257-60.
  • 25 Woolson ST, McCrory DW, Walter JF. et al. Bmode ultrasound scanning in the detection of proximal venous thrombosis after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990; 72 (07) 983-7.
  • 26 Woolson ST, Pottorff G. Venous ultrasonography in the detection of proximal vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1991; (273) 131-5.
  • 27 Rosen CL, Tracy JA. The diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2001; 19 (04) 895-912.
  • 28 Berry DJ. Surveillance for venous thromboembolic disease after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; (392) 257-66.
  • 29 Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH. et al. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56 (11) 1129-35.
  • 30 Greenland S, O’Rourke K. On the bias produced by quality sores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. Biostatistics 2001; 02 (04) 463-71.
  • 31 Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE. et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 2003; 326 7379 41-4.
  • 32 Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993; 12 (14) 1293-316.
  • 33 Bishop Y, Fienberg S, Holland P. Pseudo-Bayes estimates of cells probabilities. In: Bishop, editor. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice: MIT Press; 1975: 401.
  • 34 Greenland S. Meta-analysis. In: Rothman K, Greenland S. editors. Modern Epidemiology. Second ed. Lippincott-Raven; 1998: 643-74.
  • 35 Grady-Benson JC, Oishi CS, Hanson PB. et al. Routine postoperative duplex ultrasonography screening and monitoring for the detection of deep vein thrombosis. A survey of 110 total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1994; (307) 130-41.
  • 36 Nix ML, Nelson CL, Harmon B. et al. Duplex venous scanning: Image vs Doppler accuracy. J Vas Techn 1989; 08: 121-4.
  • 37 Leutz DW, Stauffer ES. Color duplex Doppler ultrasound scanning for detection of deep venous thrombosis in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients. Incidence, location, and diagnostic accuracy compared with ascending venography. J Arthroplast 1994; 09 (05) 543-8.
  • 38 Bohler K, Baldt M, Schuller-Petrovic S. et al. Varicose vein stripping – a prospective study of the thrombotic risk and the diagnostic significance of preoperative color coded duplex sonography. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73 (04) 597-600.
  • 39 Wysokinski W, Beyens G, Blockmans D. et al. Assessment of the patency of deep leg veins with duplex. Int Angiol 1991; 10 (02) 69-71.
  • 40 Eskandari MK, Sugimoto H, Richardson T. et al. Is color-flow duplex a good diagnostic test for detection of isolated calf vein thrombosis in high-risk patients?. Angiology 2000; 51 (09) 705-10.
  • 41 Mussurakis S, Papaioannou S, Voros D. et al. Compression ultrasonography as a reliable imaging monitor in deep venous thrombosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171 (03) 233-9.
  • 42 Piovella F, Carbone S, Siragusa S. et al. B-mode serial compression ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis after elective hip-surgery – final results of a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69 (06) 1056 [Abstract].
  • 43 Zielinsky A, Hull R, Hirsh J. et al. Comparative study of doppler ultrasound (Dp) and impedance plethysmography (ipg) in diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic deepvein thrombosis (Dvt). Circulation 1978; 58 (04) 117.
  • 44 Elias A, Cadène A, Elias M. et al. Ultrasound and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement: Diagnostic efficacy, interobserver agreement and follow-up at three months. Thromb Haemost 2001; P702 [Abstract].
  • 45 Barrellier MT, Jouen E, Creveuil C. Discrepancies between the results of phlebography and Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of asymptotic venous thrombosis after total hip prosthesis. False negatives of phlebography or false positives of Doppler ultrasonography. J Mal Vasc 1998; 23 (03) 183-90.
  • 46 Moser G, Krahenbuhl B, Donath A. Prevention of deep venous thrombosis (TVP) and pulmonary embolism. Comparison of heparin (3 × 5000 IU/day), heparin (2 × 5000 IU/day) + 0.5 mg dihydroergot, and physiotherapy (intermittent compression stockings + physical exercise). Value of Doppler diagnosis in systematic detection of TVP compared with phlebography and scanning of the legs using labelled fibrinogen. Helv Chir Acta 1980; 47 1-2 145-9.
  • 47 Barzi F, Lupattelli L, Corneli P. et al. Impedance plethysmography, Doppler echography and phlebography in deep venous thromboses of the lower limbs. Radiol Med 1990; 79 (03) 224-7.
  • 48 Kalodiki E, Nicolaides AN, al-Kutoubi A. et al. Duplex scanning in the postoperative surveillance of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 1997; 12 (03) 310-6.
  • 49 Garino JP, Lotke PA, Kitziger KJ. et al. Deep venous thrombosis after total joint arthroplasty. The role of compression ultrasonography and the importance of the experience of the technician. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1996; 78 (09) 1359-65.
  • 50 Bressollette L, Nonent M, Oger E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of compression ultrasonography for the detection of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in medical patients – the TADEUS project. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86 (02) 529-33.
  • 51 Dorfman GS, Froehlich JA, Cronan JJ. et al. Lower-extremity venous thrombosis in patients with acute hip fractures: determination of anatomic location and time of onset with compression sonography. AJR 1990; 154 (04) 851-5.
  • 52 Froehlich JA, Dorfman GS, Cronan JJ. et al. Compression ultrasonography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis in patients who have a fracture of the hip. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1989; 71 (02) 249-56.
  • 53 Monreal M, Montserrat E, Salvador R. et al. Real-time ultrasound for diagnosis of symptomatic venous thrombosis and for screening of patients at risk: correlation with ascending conventional venography. Angiology 1989; 40 (06) 527-33.
  • 54 Robinson KS, Anderson DR, Gross M. et al. Accuracy of screening compression ultrasonography and clinical examination for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 1998; 41 (05) 368-73.
  • 55 Cronan JJ, Froehlich JA, Dorfman GS. Imagedirected Doppler ultrasound: a screening technique for patients at high risk to develop deep vein thrombosis. J Clin Ultrasound 1991; 19 (03) 133-8.
  • 56 Kohler A, Hoffmann R, Platz A. et al. Diagnostic value of duplex ultrasound and liquid crystal contact thermography in preclinical detection of deep vein thrombosis after proximal femur fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117 1-2 39-42.
  • 57 Borris LC, Christiansen HM, Lassen MR. et al. Comparison of real-time B-mode ultrasonography and bilateral ascending phlebography for detection of postoperative deep vein thrombosis following elective hip surgery. The Venous Thrombosis Group. Thromb Haemost 1989; 61 (03) 363-5.
  • 58 Vanninen R, Manninen H, Soimakallio S. et al. Asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in the calf: accuracy and limitations of ultrasonography as a screening test after total knee arthroplasty. Br J Radiol 1993; 66 (783) 199-202.
  • 59 Rose SC, Zwiebel WJ, Murdock LE. et al. Insensitivity of color Doppler flow imaging for detection of acute calf deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic postoperative patients. J Vas Interv Radiol 1993; 04 (01) 111-7.
  • 60 Jongbloets LM, Lensing AW, Koopman MM. et al. Limitations of compression ultrasound for the detection of symptomless postoperative deep vein thrombosis. Lancet 1994; 343 8906 1142-4.
  • 61 Lausen I, Jensen R, Wille-Jorgensen P. et al. Colour Doppler flow imaging ultrasonography versus venography as screening method for asymptomatic postoperative deep venous thrombosis. Eur J Radiol 1995; 20 (03) 200-4.
  • 62 Thornton A, Lee P. Publication bias in metaanalysis: its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53 (02) 207-16.
  • 63 Westrich GH, Allen ML, Tarantino SJ. et al. Ultrasound screening for deep venous thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty. 2-year reassessment. Clin Orthop 1998; (356) 125-33.
  • 64 Morgan B, Tudor G, Green J. et al. Screening post surgical high risk groups for proximal deep venous thrombosis with ultrasound: A practical alternative to venography. Knee 1997; 04 (02) 77-9.
  • 65 Badgett DK, Comerota MC, Khan MN. et al. Duplex venous imaging: role for a comprehensive lower extremity examination. Ann Vasc Surg 2000; 14 (01) 73-6.
  • 66 Atri M, Herba MJ, Reinhold C. et al. et al. Accuracy of sonography in the evaluation of calf deep vein thrombosis in both postoperative surveillance and symptomatic patients. AJR 1996; 166 (06) 1361-7.
  • 67 Walter SD. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med 2002; 21 (09) 1237-56.
  • 68 Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM, Heisterkamp SH. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Stat Med 2002; 21 (11) 1525-37.
  • 69 Cher DJ, Conwell JA, Mandel JS. MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: meta-analysis and implications. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47 (04) 367-80.
  • 70 Robinson KS, Anderson DR, Gross M. et al. Ultrasonographic screening before hospital discharge for deep venous thrombosis after arthroplasty: the post-arthroplasty screening study. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127 (06) 439-45.
  • 71 Leclerc JR, Gent M, Hirsh J, Geerts WH, Ginsberg JS. The incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism during and after prophylaxis with enoxaparin: a multi-institutional cohort study of patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty. Canadian Collaborative Group. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158 (08) 873-8.
  • 72 Sackett DL. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic accuracy: Discussion. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48 (01) 131-2.
  • 73 Pellegrini Jr VD, Clement D, Lush-Ehmann C. et al. The John Charnley Award. Natural history of thromboembolic disease after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996; (333) 27-40.
  • 74 Linkins LA, Choi PT, Douketis JD. Clinical impact of bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139 (11) 893-900.
  • 75 Rodgers A, MacMahon S. Systematic underestimation of treatment effects as a result of diagnostic test inaccuracy: implications for the interpretation and design of thromboprophylaxis trials. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73 (02) 167-71.
  • 76 Milne RM, Gunn AA, Griffiths JM. et al. Postoperative deep venous thrombosis. A comparison of diagnostic techniques. Lancet 1971; 02 7722 445-7.
  • 77 Mitsunaga MM, Ferris 3rd EB, Kong AY. et al. Thromboembolism after hip surgery. Comparison of screening methods. Postgrad Med 1986; 80 (04) 42-3 46-7.
  • 78 Flinn WR, Sandager GP, Cerullo LJ. et al. Duplex venous scanning for the prospective surveillance of perioperative venous thrombosis. Arch Surg 1989; 124 (08) 901-5.
  • 79 Borris LC, Christiansen HM, Lassen MR. et al. Real-time B-mode ultrasonography in the diagnosis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in non-symptomatic high-risk patients. The Venous Thrombosis Group. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990; 04 (05) 473-5.
  • 80 Comerota AJ, Katz ML, Greenwald LL. et al. Venous duplex imaging: should it replace hemodynamic tests for deep venous thrombosis?. J Vasc Surg 1990; 11 (01) 53-9 discussion 59-61.
  • 81 White RH, Goulet JA, Bray TJ. et al. Deepvein thrombosis after fracture of the pelvis: assessment with serial duplex-ultrasound screening. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990; 72 (04) 495-500.
  • 82 Ginsberg JS, Caco CC, Brill-Edwards PA. et al. Venous thrombosis in patients who have undergone major hip or knee surgery: detection with compression US and impedance plethysmography. Radiology 1991; 181 (03) 651-4.
  • 83 Mattos MA, Londrey GL, Leutz DW. et al. Color-flow duplex scanning for the surveillance and diagnosis of acute deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15 (02) 366-75.
  • 84 Tremaine MD, Choroszy CJ, Gordon GH. et al. Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis by compression ultrasound in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast 1992; 07 (02) 187-92.
  • 85 Elliott CG, Suchyta M, Rose SC. et al. Duplex ultrasonography for the detection of deep vein thrombi after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Angiology 1993; 44 (01) 26-33.
  • 86 Grady-Benson JC, Oishi CS, Hanson PB. et al. Postoperative surveillance for deep venous thrombosis with duplex ultrasonography after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994; 76 (11) 1649-57.
  • 87 Bombardini T, Borghi B, Mattioli R. et al. Proximal deep vein thrombosis: the use of the echoDoppler for diagnosis and therapeutic indications. Chir Organi Mov 1995; 80 (01) 61-4.
  • 88 Magnusson M, Eriksson BI, Kalebo P. et al. Is colour Doppler ultrasound a sensitive screening method in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis after hip surgery?. Thromb Haemost 1996; 75 (02) 242-5.
  • 89 Lensing AW, Doris CI, McGrath FP. et al. A comparison of compression ultrasound with color Doppler ultrasound for the diagnosis of symptomless postoperative deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157 (07) 765-8.
  • 90 Ciccone WJ, Fox PS, Neumyer M. et al. Ultrasound surveillance for asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis after total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998; 80 (08) 1167-74.